Yep, this looks like a standard Twitter spambot retweeting a lame MRA "joke" to meSeems pretty pointless. Trump supporters are such blind loyalists they deny, excuse, ignore or deflect literally everything negative he has ever done. Ive even seen a Trump spokesman justify Trump defending Bills accusers and attacking those same women he brought as props to the second debate. He said it was just someone being "loyal and defending a friend".. but attacking his wife is fair game because she defended her husband... its a justification that is beyond retarded.
There are plenty of negative things about Hillary and I dont deny them. Instead, id rather read the facts and evidence to determine whether its as bad as the right says, and it falls under bad but completely overblown, full of assumptions with no evidence or outright bullshit.
Can you get this post to pretend to make a point?
Such manipulation of public opinion really calls into question the validity of democracy.
That's his point. Is it that hard to understand?
Such manipulation of public opinion really calls into question the validity of democracy.
That's his point. Is it that hard to understand?
Obvious deception is obvious. Propaganda at it's best.
However, let's entertain the idea they are trolling with here. Should women be allowed to vote?
Like, omg u sexist pig. Like omg, patriarchy! Like you um... really need to check your white privledge! Like omg.No they obviously shouldn't.
Women are also terrible drivers, we should repeal their right to drive.
Also, everybody knows women in education is like having a donkey do calculus, to quote Frank Reynolds. So we should ban them from getting an education.
Fuck it, might as well cover them up so they can't seduce random men and provoke unsolicited sexing.
Seems pretty pointless. Trump supporters are such blind loyalists they deny, excuse, ignore or deflect literally everything negative he has ever done. Ive even seen a Trump spokesman justify Trump defending Bills accusers and attacking those same women he brought as props to the second debate. He said it was just someone being "loyal and defending a friend".. but attacking his wife is fair game because she defended her husband... its a justification that is beyond retarded.
There are plenty of negative things about Hillary and I dont deny them. Instead, id rather read the facts and evidence to determine whether its as bad as the right says, and it falls under bad but completely overblown, full of assumptions with no evidence or outright bullshit.