Movies Rate and Discuss the Last Movie You Saw v.16

Last nite I saw Snake Eyes, a 1998 intriguing thriller starring Nicholas Cage and Sinise. It was directed by Brian De Palma and his directing was sensationally all over the movie 🎥 🍿!! The storyline was intriguing, but not irrational to follow; what made me remain glued to the movie though was some kind of magic created by De Palma, what with the raging storm, the apparently hysterical close-ups of the actors , their weird attitude all thru the film, the unpredictable scenes in between the predictable ones and the general flow of the storyline without exaggerating.
A must-see for all true movie buffs who are knee-deep into suspense and weirdness in films
View attachment 1087699
One of those movies I've never been able to make it through, it's a shit show
 
One of those movies I've never been able to make it through, it's a shit show
I had the same feeling at the beginning , but as the scenes rolled on, I noticed I was being entertained without having to think too much about the plot evolution factor ! I dunno, I acknowledged every single scene and the plot made sense in the end.
I was much more unpleasantly confused with films like Inception or Shutter Island, just to name 2 :):):)
 
Watched The Usual Suspects (1992) 10/10 for the first time in at least a decade. Just a perfect film. I had forgotten how short it was at just about 1h 40m.

Spacey is just unbelievable in this. One of his best performances. The guy was just incredible in the 90s.
 
Blue Steel (1990)
-
I enjoyed the over the top 90s thriller atmosphere. It is very rainy, and dark, and NYC visually. Ron Silver is very over the top as a bad guy and the plot is extremely convoluted, though in a somewhat charming way.

Jamie Lee Curtis does well enough in the lead. She is far from competent at times, but her vulnerability clashes well with her extremely cartoonish nemesis in Ron Silver. As well as her more hardened and experienced mentor in Clancy Brown.

I mean, after watching it I feel like I should like it more than I do. I think it is because some of the writing is very bad and the pacing is very strange for what should be a slam dunk 90 minute flyby.

Overall though I still think there is enough here to make it worth the watch.
Especially Ron Silver.

6/10 range
 
Blue Steel (1990)
-
I enjoyed the over the top 90s thriller atmosphere. It is very rainy, and dark, and NYC visually. Ron Silver is very over the top as a bad guy and the plot is extremely convoluted, though in a somewhat charming way.

Jamie Lee Curtis does well enough in the lead. She is far from competent at times, but her vulnerability clashes well with her extremely cartoonish nemesis in Ron Silver. As well as her more hardened and experienced mentor in Clancy Brown.

I mean, after watching it I feel like I should like it more than I do. I think it is because some of the writing is very bad and the pacing is very strange for what should be a slam dunk 90 minute flyby.

Overall though I still think there is enough here to make it worth the watch.
Especially Ron Silver.

6/10 range
I'm the one who always says "seen one police/criminal story, seen them all" , but I have to go along with you for Blue Steel. It stands out in its own right in the genre.
 
Well, what to say ...just saw this movie for the umpteenth time and everytime I see it, some new detail in the photography, storyline, actor, etc jump out and KOs me !!!
Tom Hanks is the ONLY actor who could've pulled it off so majestically. Period.
1742660037206.jpeg
 
Prisoners (2013)

8/10

Tense movie that keeps you guessing. Not sure the end totally hit for me and I found the whole portion surrounding David dastmalchians character to be unnecessarily confusing, but the acting was superb. Hugh jackman and Jake gyllenhall both knock it out of park.
Recently watched that also and fully agree with your thoughts on it. Really liked the Hugh Jackman performance in Prisoners as it had me going back and forth on his character.

I double featured it with Brothers, another Jake G movie, but the star of that was Tobey Maguire. Intense movie with a great performance from TM especially during the standoff scene. Just like Prisoners though the ending felt like it left something on the table.
 

Homicide (USA, 1991)

David Mamet constructs an intricate and morally ambiguous crime drama that plays with the conventions of its genre. While outwardly a police procedural, the film is, at its core, a meditation on identity, loyalty, and existential crisis. It starts as one thing—the police manhunt for a violent Black drug dealer—then shifts to another—the shotgun murder of an elderly Jewish woman in a predominantly Black neighborhood—before spiralling into yet another possibility: a shadowy anti-Semitic - or perhaps Zionist - conspiracy. The narrative continuously shifts, making it impossible to pin down a single driving plot. Throw in clipped, rhythmic dialogue, and it's classic Mamet.

Detective Bobby Gold (Joe Mantegna), a seasoned but disillusioned Jewish police officer, is in pursuit of a high-profile drug dealer alongside his partner, Tim Sullivan (William H. Macy), when he is sidetracked by what seems like a minor case: the murder of an elderly Jewish shopkeeper, Mrs. Klein. Initially indifferent to the crime, Gold is soon drawn into the world of Jewish identity and heritage—something he has long suppressed or distanced himself from.

Gold exists in a police world filled with macho posturing, passive-aggressive jabs, and simmering bigotry. Every scene between officers feels like a powder keg of department politics, clashing egos, and casual racism. Like most of his colleagues, Gold has numbed himself to this environment by shutting off any identity outside of being a cop. But the shopkeeper's murder forces him to confront contradictions within himself—his reluctance to embrace his Jewish identity, his need for acceptance among his fellow officers, and the uneasy realization that he might not truly belong anywhere.

The ending is fascinatingly ambiguous. Gold must reckon with whether any of it meant anything at all. His tragedy is not that he chose the wrong side, but that he never truly knew where he belonged in the first place.

Rating: 8/10

 
After a short snack on a chilly rainy day today, I saw The Black Cat, 1966 remake of the classic film based on E.A.Poe's story. I will never forget the sleazy FX like the axe on the head of the blonde final girl 😲 😲 😲 😲
View attachment 1087979View attachment 1087980

Homicide (USA, 1991)

David Mamet constructs an intricate and morally ambiguous crime drama that plays with the conventions of its genre. While outwardly a police procedural, the film is, at its core, a meditation on identity, loyalty, and existential crisis. It starts as one thing—the police manhunt for a violent Black drug dealer—then shifts to another—the shotgun murder of an elderly Jewish woman in a predominantly Black neighborhood—before spiralling into yet another possibility: a shadowy anti-Semitic - or perhaps Zionist - conspiracy. The narrative continuously shifts, making it impossible to pin down a single driving plot. Throw in clipped, rhythmic dialogue, and it's classic Mamet.

Detective Bobby Gold (Joe Mantegna), a seasoned but disillusioned Jewish police officer, is in pursuit of a high-profile drug dealer alongside his partner, Tim Sullivan (William H. Macy), when he is sidetracked by what seems like a minor case: the murder of an elderly Jewish shopkeeper, Mrs. Klein. Initially indifferent to the crime, Gold is soon drawn into the world of Jewish identity and heritage—something he has long suppressed or distanced himself from.

Gold exists in a police world filled with macho posturing, passive-aggressive jabs, and simmering bigotry. Every scene between officers feels like a powder keg of department politics, clashing egos, and casual racism. Like most of his colleagues, Gold has numbed himself to this environment by shutting off any identity outside of being a cop. But the shopkeeper's murder forces him to confront contradictions within himself—his reluctance to embrace his Jewish identity, his need for acceptance among his fellow officers, and the uneasy realization that he might not truly belong anywhere.

The ending is fascinatingly ambiguous. Gold must reckon with whether any of it meant anything at all. His tragedy is not that he chose the wrong side, but that he never truly knew where he belonged in the first place.

Rating: 8/10


Gosh, quite a sleazy film methinx. I enjoy movies with plot shifts coz they're generally not boring.
 
I.D. 1995
1742812572303.jpeg

Cracking British film. Reese Dinsdale puts on a power house performance as John, a simple Bobby sent undercover with a few other coppers to infiltrate a firm of football hooligans in East London. By far the meatiest role of his career and he absolutely nails it. Big shout to Lee Ross for his performance as Gumbo, put those two acting turns in an American movie and they'd easily have been Oscar worthy

I grew up in that 80's era where football hooligans were the lost generation of men with no war to fight in. Seen my fair share incidents as a West ham fan back then. Top notch movie

Rated YOU FUCKING WHAT CUNT/10
 
Heretic 5/10. Found it to be more of a high school theology discussion than horror.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice 6.5/10. Great art design, Keaton still has it, a nostolgia bomb. But outside of that it lacked substance.

Furiosa 6/10. Bit of a letdown compared to Fury Road.

The Substance 8.5/10. Creative, great acting from Moore, a lot of fun.

Good Time 7/10. Intense chaotic thriller. Pattison is a better actor than I originally thought.

Age of Innocence 7/10. I'm a sucker for period pieces. Scorcese went out his comfort zone. Costumes and sets were on point.

Welcome to Dollhouse 3/10. Trash. Been waiting to see this since 1995 or so. Letdown.

Bronx Tale 7/10. Chazz Palenteri carried it. Without him it's a 5/10 . De Niro's contribution was more as a director, he only has a small but important supporting role. but he relied too much on in experienced/poor younger actors and it hurt the film.
 
Last edited:
Mickey 17 (USA, 2025)

Bong Joon Ho cashed in on the success of Parasite to create a big-budget science fiction black comedy based on the novel Mickey 7.

Set in 2054, the film follows Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson) and his best friend Timo (Steven Yeun), who fall into trouble with violent gangsters after taking out a loan to start a macaroon business ("Macaroons are the New Hamburgers" proved to be an unfortunate miscalculation). Facing a grim fate on Earth, both men opt for a one-way trip on a spaceship to help establish a new colony. Timo talks his way into a pilot job, while the hapless and unskilled Mickey is assigned the role of an "expendable"—a crew member repeatedly subjected to dangerous tasks and replicated, with memories intact, upon death. The fact that the film begins with Mickey already on his 17th version speaks volumes about the life expectancy of an expendable.

Colonial life on the frozen planet is brutal, and Mickey struggles to survive amid the perils of his new environment. Bong crafts an absurdist sci-fi narrative infused with a heavy-handed and withering critique of capitalism and fascism. This is unsurprising given his previous works, but here he amplifies his themes through the character of Kenneth Marshall (Mark Ruffalo), the colony's stunningly incompetent and bigoted leader. Marshall’s desire for a "pure population for this white planet" is matched only by his venality and stupidity.

This, unfortunately, is where the film falters. Marshall would have been more effective as a distant antagonist, an occasionally seen force making life difficult for Mickey. Instead, Ruffalo's character is given excessive screen time despite being shallowly written. Ultimately Marshall is just a buffoon and nobody wants to spend that much time with an idiot.

While the novel compensates for its basic plot through the protagonist’s engaging first-person perspective, Bong simplifies the story even further, leading to a third act that devolves into muddled CGI spectacle. The film struggles to find a balance between black comedy and sci-fi adventure, ultimately succeeding at neither. It is funny, but not funny enough, and the sc-fi adventure part is mostly dull.

There are elements to appreciate. Pattinson delivers an engaging performance, the production design is impressive, and the film contains moments of genuine humor. However, rather than being an outright failure, Mickey 17 feels more like a missed opportunity than a bad idea—a film with potential that never fully realizes its ambitions.

(I would 100% watch a 6 episode Apple series about Mickey and Timo's macaroon business.)

Rating: 5.5/10

1742946099417.png
 
Back
Top