Movies Rate and Discuss the Last Movie You Saw v.16

A Scanner Darkly (USA, 2006)

Richard Linklater’s A Scanner Darkly is a dystopian fever dream of paranoia, addiction, and surveillance, adapted from Philip K. Dick’s semi-autobiographical novel of the same name. Utilizing rotoscope animation (you will either like the style or you won't), the film blurs the line between reality and hallucination, mirroring its protagonist’s crumbling sense of self.

The story follows Bob Arctor (Keanu Reeves), an undercover agent assigned to monitor a group of drug users—including himself. The drug in question, Substance D, causes severe cognitive dissonance, splitting the brain into warring hemispheres. As Arctor continues ingesting the drug for the sake of his investigation, he begins to lose track of his identity, unable to distinguish his role as a narcotics agent from his life as an addict.

The film is permeated with cynicism and decay. Arctor works for a faceless bureaucracy, and both he and other members of law enforcement wear “scramble suits,” which obscure their identities even from one another. This injects a sense of surrealism and dark humour, while highlighting Arctor’s growing disillusionment, paranoia, and estrangement from reality. As he sinks deeper into addiction and surveillance-induced paranoia, the distinction between the world’s inherent absurdity and the effects of the drug becomes increasingly blurred.

Many scenes could be lifted from any film about junkies. Arctor’s drug-addled friends pontificate about philosophy while struggling with basic daily tasks. A simple car breakdown spirals into an extended sequence of paranoia, where the group convinces themselves that their house is bugged and that authorities have likely planted drugs to entrap them. They consider selling the house but are stumped by how to price the hidden drugs, as they neither know the type nor the quantity.

Reeves delivers a surprisingly strong performance in the lead role, playing to his strengths as a quiet, introspective presence. Robert Downey Jr., however, steals nearly every scene as James Barris, an erratic and untrustworthy intellectual whose rapid-fire monologues teeter between brilliance and madness.

The ending is grimly appropriate, reinforcing the film’s bleak worldview.

Rating: 7/10


This and Zodiac were really sort of perfect precursor performances to the ultimate RDJ comeback role a couple of years later in Iron Man. You could tell that the guy was already back on the map in a big way in 06-07; the massive hit with Marvel just cemented it.
 
The Time Travelers wife
-
Bana and McAdams have good enough chemistry together. I'm guessing without checking that a decent amount of scenes were cut because both Ron Livingston and Steve Trobolowsky both have smaller roles than what the film seems to imply. It is a chick-flick at basics. But it doesn't get too mushy or cheesy and allows for darker moments to slip in here and there. Wasnt bad.

6/10 range maybe.


Detroit Rock City
-
I would always call this one underrated but it had been a while. So decided to finally rewatch it after a long time. Yeah, I would still call this underrated or a hidden gem or however you want to label it. At least as much as a comedy can be labeled that.

It gets by on almost 0 star power, besides Edward Furlong who isn't even the main character and Natasha Lyonne who has far as I remember was not a star in 1999 or at least wasn't in my mind. It is a fun, friends go on a road trip -and -come of- age 'comedy. Each friend has somewhat of an arc to overcome and gets time to shine. It also has a great soundtrack and doesn't take itself too seriously.

Also, does the "Beth" character and Kiss thing years before Role Models. As well as I love you Man, which yeah was Rush but still, DRC did the whole "characters love a band" thing first. I'm sure I'm forgetting another movie though.

7/10 range. Not perfect but a lot of fun.
 
The Time Travelers wife
-
Bana and McAdams have good enough chemistry together. I'm guessing without checking that a decent amount of scenes were cut because both Ron Livingston and Steve Trobolowsky both have smaller roles than what the film seems to imply. It is a chick-flick at basics. But it doesn't get too mushy or cheesy and allows for darker moments to slip in here and there. Wasnt bad.

6/10 range maybe.


Detroit Rock City
-
I would always call this one underrated but it had been a while. So decided to finally rewatch it after a long time. Yeah, I would still call this underrated or a hidden gem or however you want to label it. At least as much as a comedy can be labeled that.

It gets by on almost 0 star power, besides Edward Furlong who isn't even the main character and Natasha Lyonne who has far as I remember was not a star in 1999 or at least wasn't in my mind. It is a fun, friends go on a road trip -and -come of- age 'comedy. Each friend has somewhat of an arc to overcome and gets time to shine. It also has a great soundtrack and doesn't take itself too seriously.

Also, does the "Beth" character and Kiss thing years before Role Models. As well as I love you Man, which yeah was Rush but still, DRC did the whole "characters love a band" thing first. I'm sure I'm forgetting another movie though.

7/10 range. Not perfect but a lot of fun.

The Time Travellers Wife always gives me the feels. Gets me every time.
 
This and Zodiac were really sort of perfect precursor performances to the ultimate RDJ comeback role a couple of years later in Iron Man. You could tell that the guy was already back on the map in a big way in 06-07; the massive hit with Marvel just cemented it.

The main thing that RDJ needed to prove was that he was insurable.

Famously, Mel Gibson had to personally cover his insurance in order to get a bond for The Singing Detective in 2003.

Not sure when subsequent productions were able to get RDJ under a normal completion bond vs. "creative solutions".
 
The Time Travelers wife
-
Bana and McAdams have good enough chemistry together. I'm guessing without checking that a decent amount of scenes were cut because both Ron Livingston and Steve Trobolowsky both have smaller roles than what the film seems to imply. It is a chick-flick at basics. But it doesn't get too mushy or cheesy and allows for darker moments to slip in here and there. Wasnt bad.

6/10 range maybe.


Detroit Rock City
-
I would always call this one underrated but it had been a while. So decided to finally rewatch it after a long time. Yeah, I would still call this underrated or a hidden gem or however you want to label it. At least as much as a comedy can be labeled that.

It gets by on almost 0 star power, besides Edward Furlong who isn't even the main character and Natasha Lyonne who has far as I remember was not a star in 1999 or at least wasn't in my mind. It is a fun, friends go on a road trip -and -come of- age 'comedy. Each friend has somewhat of an arc to overcome and gets time to shine. It also has a great soundtrack and doesn't take itself too seriously.

Also, does the "Beth" character and Kiss thing years before Role Models. As well as I love you Man, which yeah was Rush but still, DRC did the whole "characters love a band" thing first. I'm sure I'm forgetting another movie though.

7/10 range. Not perfect but a lot of fun.

McAdams is so good. Wish we'd see more movies from her.

I think she's sort of subtly been one of the best actresses out there since the Mean Girls/Notebook/Red Eye days. Red Eye really stood out to me. McAdams, Cillian, and Craven elevated that well above what it might otherwise have been.
 
Watching the new Venom

How was it? I pretty much lost interest after the second one. Funny enough, I didn't even dislike it to the extent many others did. But it felt very disjointed, wasted a great actor like Woody, wasted Carnage as a character. I'm sure I'll get around to the third one but I didn't venture to the theater for it like I did the predecessors.
 
How was it? I pretty much lost interest after the second one. Funny enough, I didn't even dislike it to the extent many others did. But it felt very disjointed, wasted a great actor like Woody, wasted Carnage as a character. I'm sure I'll get around to the third one but I didn't venture to the theater for it like I did the predecessors.
No doubt the worst one... Feels like they are just putting them out for a quick buck.
 
No doubt the worst one... Feels like they are just putting them out for a quick buck.

They started out wanting to make art - or at very least a careful examination of essentialism and the human condition - and by the 3rd film it has collapsed into crass commercialism.

EDIT: To expand on the above, the first Venom film is essentially a modern existential parable. It explores the battle between id and superego, the integration of the shadow self; and it confronts the absurdity of existence and the necessity of choice.

What appears on the surface to be a chaotic, darkly humorous action film is, in fact, a meditation on what it means to be human. Eddie Brock is not merely a man possessed by an alien—he is Everyman, struggling to reconcile his higher ideals with his baser instincts. Venom is not merely a monster; he is the mirror reflecting Eddie’s true nature back at him.

In the end, Venom leaves us with an essential existential question: If we are all hosts to forces beyond our control—whether social, psychological, or cosmic—can we ever truly be free? The answer, as the film suggests, is paradoxical: only by embracing our inner chaos can we begin to take control of it.

The third film is trash.
 
Last edited:
Symphony for a Massacre (France, 1963)

Jacques Deray's Symphony for a Massacre is a cerebral crime thriller that unfolds with precision and control. Following a group of five seasoned criminals who pool their resources for a major drug deal, the film gradually unravels into a tense story of deceit, betrayal, and cold-blooded ruthlessness.

Deray’s gangsters are not impulsive brutes but calculated men for whom violence is a means to an end rather than a source of pleasure. Their restraint makes them all the more unsettling, as their betrayals play out with the slow inevitability of a carefully orchestrated tragedy.

The direction is sharp and economical, with not a wasted frame. Every scene is carefully composed, reflecting the characters’ own deliberate nature. The cinematography reinforces this sense of control, utilizing stark lighting, sharp contrasts, and precise framing to heighten the film’s moral ambiguity. Deep shadows and harsh lighting cast an ominous pall over the proceedings, visually mirroring the deception at play.

One of the film’s most striking choices is its use of long takes, allowing the weight of each decision to settle fully on the audience. Instead of relying on rapid cuts to generate tension, Deray creates unease through stillness—lingering on faces, empty spaces, and silence before violence erupts.

An exceptional example of French noir, the film is a must-see for any fan of the genre.

Rating: 8.5/10


 
Been going through a glut of films as of late, a bit unusual for me. Lots of bucket list check offs.

There Will Blood (rewatch)
Notorious (rewatch)
Richard III
Phantom Thread
Chungking Express
All About My Mother
Il Postino
The Brutalist
The Father

Il Postino has been something I've been meaning to watch for over 20 years. Beautiful, sad, bittersweet. Knowing that the lead actor died one day after filming due to delaying heart surgery to complete the film gives everything a bit too much weight. It's heavy in that context. 8.5/10.
 
Last edited:
Talk To Me -7/10 (Netflix)
This is a very well done Australian high concept horror movie. A group of teens have parties using an embalmed hand that lets them see spirits and get high from letting them possess them for 90 seconds. This is a very realistic cast, no pretty faces here. The film builds tension, explores loss and loneliness, and has some very brutal scenes. I think they could have ramped up the scares a bit, instead rely heavily on disturbing and creepy scenes. This falls in the Smile movie category, and is well worth a watch.
 
I wasn't expecting to like The Electric State as much as I did. Knew early doors it was going to be a bit of a tear jerker but it was really good. I'll watch anything with Chris Prat after falling in love with anything Guardians related but I don't watch many PG13 movies so this was sort of going through the motions anticipation wise. Woody's character was brilliant, just a very well put together film.
8.5/10.
 
gladiator 2, it was okay. denzel was the best part of the movie but i was confused as to why everyone kept referring to the main guy as maximus's son when he clearly wasnt. 6.5/10
 
gladiator 2, it was okay. denzel was the best part of the movie but i was confused as to why everyone kept referring to the main guy as maximus's son when he clearly wasnt. 6.5/10

I didn't understand why the connection was even made. It was also weird because pascal didn't look much older than him.
 
Somebody recommended I watch A Scanner Darkly and the film Mad God.

A Scanner Darkly was well and good, but then when I viewed Mad God, jfc, my brain has been hung in a noose since. What a dark, relentlessly depressing, slog of a film. 15 minutes in I’m thinking, “it must have been an hour already, thank god it’ll be over soon” then I checked the time. Jokes all over me. But you know what? It’s a beautiful, hell of a well made film and I’m glad I watched it. Probably won’t again though lmao. Once was enough. Would recommend.
 
Somebody recommended I watch A Scanner Darkly and the film Mad God.

A Scanner Darkly was well and good, but then when I viewed Mad God, jfc, my brain has been hung in a noose since. What a dark, relentlessly depressing, slog of a film. 15 minutes in I’m thinking, “it must have been an hour already, thank god it’ll be over soon” then I checked the time. Jokes all over me. But you know what? It’s a beautiful, hell of a well made film and I’m glad I watched it. Probably won’t again though lmao. Once was enough. Would recommend.
I watched Mad God on Shudder last year. It's by the guy that did the Star Wars claymation/stopmotion scenes (Chewbacca's game). It was creative but cant say I found it depressing. Probably because I watch a lot of depressing shit lol.
 
knocked off a few more from the bucket list:

Licorice Pizza - It's a good, upbeat coming of age love story. The cameos steal the show at times. I recommend it. 8/10.

Past Lives - bittersweet love story mixed with some eastern philosophy. The leads are solid but I find it hard to recommend 7/10.

I'm Still Here - based on a true story where a husband/father gets kidnapped by a fascist regime and the family has to go through hell to navigate that. Depressing at times and inspiring. 8/10.

The Life of Emile Zola (1937) - it won best picture and I hadnt seen it. Like the acting of the time, it's melodramatic. Based on a true story (Dreyfus Affair). If you're a film history or general history buff it's interesting. Otherwise skip it. 6/10.

Sergeant York (1941) - Gary Cooper is great, set piece war scenes are top notch for the time. But unless you're into 1940s film, probably a skip for most. It's more or less sappy military propoganda 7/10.

The Boy and the Heron - it's a newer Miyizaki film that matches up well with his top tier classics. 8.5/10
 
Last edited:
Back
Top