Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[Deleted member 577981]

Believing them to be real, and telling everyone that she knows they are real and anyone who denies them as real is wrong are 2 completely different things.

And yet this has nothing at all to do with the post I made, which was about showing an example of how scientifically minded people can have honest, intelligent and civil discussions about fringe topics.

Also, I could invert what you've said also and turn it on the denying crowd couldn't I? I could just as easily say believing them not to be real is not proof that they're not real and it's okay to believe they're not real but it's not okay to tell people they're wrong who do believe they are real.

And also go read every single one of my posts. I've never once told people they're wrong for not believing, so you should keep that in mind also. My entire stance is that it is just fine not to believe and it is just fine to believe but what isn't in place and what isn't appropriate is mocking people who believe.

 

[TribalDrumz]

I didn't invoke one person's name. I invoked three NPR's ira flatow, Jeff meldrum and Jane Goodall. But I specifically stated that I invoked their names to show that scientifically-minded people can have intelligent discussions about fringed topics without mocking.

But you'll just be a lying hack and pretend otherwise to defend whatever emotional problems you have.

You would think if I was going to appeal to authority to make a specific case I would quite quote Carl Young since he actually agrees with my position, whereas these three people hold an entirely different view than I do about bigfoot's existence that is contrary to it and incompatible to it.

But this is a pattern with you... to not read and then have strong opinions in comment anyway and then to stick to your guns and pretend it was on purpose.

You’re probably the most embarrassing poster on this site now. Your whole agenda on here is religion ,UFOs , and now Bigfoot…

Constantly writing essays on fake fairy tales of your shitty belief system.

That weirdo clown @BearGrounds right behind you as the delusional duo.

 

[Deleted member 577981]

You’re probably the most embarrassing poster on this site now. Your whole agenda on here is religion ,UFOs , and now Bigfoot…

Constantly writing essays on fake fairy tales of your shitty belief system.

That weirdo clown @BearGrounds right behind you as the delusional duo.

Ok.

 

[Blayt7hh]

you literally posted this part of the interview in here yourself bud. I didn't pick this.

Of course jane finds ancedotes passed on from native americans compelling evidence, she's spelling out she's in love with the idea of them being real and always has been.

Well Native Americans can talk to animals and spirits so they are the go to source if you’re trying to find something in the woods.

Since he doesn’t want answer the question of who found the irrefutable proof of Bigfoot foot prints I’ll go ahead and do it for him.

Jeff Meldrum found them. So please, go waste your time listening to an hour long podcast and reading this guys book.

 

[TribalDrumz]

Ok.

Ya ok quit wasting site bandwidth on your fake fairy tale stories of nonsense and trying to brainwash people to try and believe in bullshit that doesn’t exist.

 

[Blayt7hh]

You’re probably the most embarrassing poster on this site now. Your whole agenda on here is religion ,UFOs , and now Bigfoot…

Constantly writing essays on fake fairy tales of your shitty belief system.

That weirdo clown @BearGrounds right behind you as the delusional duo.

Yeah he spun a good game when he first came in this thread and I took him seriously. The facade has slipped though and the cats out of the bag. At least Beargrounds where’s his crazy on his sleeve

 

[Deleted member 577981]

Ya ok quit wasting site bandwidth on your fake fairy tale stories of nonsense and trying to brainwash people to try and believe in bullshit that doesn’t exist.

I'm sorry you feel this way.

 

[Andy Capp]

No, it doesn't, because I'm not saying that it can't be done (it already has, just not for the civilian populace). I also never said anywhere that they live in entire colonies, where did you get that from? They live in small family units, or independently, according to general consensus within the field.

Another thing to note, is that based upon track evidence, there is about one of them to every 100 bears. They're a moving needle in a haystack.

Added to that, you guys keep missing the obvious fact that they haven't gone unnoticed, or kept completely "under wraps". Literally countless people have seen them, and continue to. They leave footprints and other sign of their existence.

It would be profitable for all sorts of government secrets to be sold, why aren't they? Could it be that stuff like the story below actually takes place?

Bigfoot Bodies Removed After 1980 Mt. St. Helens Eruption​

Bigfoot Bodies Removed After 1980 Mt. St. Helens Eruption – Washington Bigfoot

washingtonbigfoot.com

That all said, you're welcome to believe that they don't exist, just like everybody else who hasn't had an experience. You're also welcome to think we're idiots, that's fine. We don't care, no offense - you might as well be telling me the moon isn't likely real because of x,y,z. I'm just gonna sit back and shrug it off, comfortable in my knowledge of what's really the case.

LMAO @ bigfoot bodies and any remotely plausible reason to keep them a secret.

 

[shockaholic12]

How is real estate, national parks and services (BILLIONS of dollars annually), logging and forestry, etc. not profitable industry?

You guys just need to think more, seriously.

You have no right to dismiss a phenomena with such terrible arguments.

Any logger or park ranger could retire a millionaire if they came across evidence of bigfoot this is a real dumb take.

 

[TribalDrumz]

Lmao at Bigfoot hides the bodies but they haven’t even found a fucking hair strand

 

[Andy Capp]

Yes, but only some of her words and not in context!!! which is a kind of lying. It's the exact kind of lying that we accuse the so-called scientifically-minded crowd in this threat of practicing.

Accuse is a good word because that's all you're doing. Accusing. You want everyone to address your point of view as though it's first time any of us have had this discussion when we've been there and done that. You arrogantly assume only you have considered things the way you do like you're some sort of guru. It's gross and sad.

You can do better.

 

[Blayt7hh]

Lmao at Bigfoot hides the bodies but they haven’t even found a fucking hair strand

We find bones of dinosaurs from 65 million years ago. But Bigfoots really good at hiding shit

 

[Andy Capp]

NASA admits their “photos” are artist renditions

And you still believe they are photos, Mandy

LOL and what is the difference between them and the photos I took?

Do you think they're fake too?

 

[Deleted member 577981]

Accuse is a good word because that's all you're doing. Accusing. You want everyone to address your point of view as though it's first time any of us have had this discussion when we've been there and done that. You arrogantly assume only you have considered things the way you do like you're some sort of guru. It's gross and sad.

You can do better.

Yes, it's terrible of me to want people to actually discuss things rather than lie and slander and mock. Arguing that being open to data and honest discussion about fringe topics is the scientific method is also a terrible thing to stand for. I can see why you're so angry.

Also, I don't care if anybody addresses my viewpoint. I just think that if they're going to discuss it with me they should address it. But I think that is just the definition of a discussion....

They could just as easily ignore my posts.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

That's a nice change of subject, but how about we stick to the topic that you omitted facts twice in a row trying to make a ridiculous and dishonest case, probably in the name of science?

I don't even believe her perspective, just so you know. But at least we can agree.it's important to be honest about people's perspectives, can't we?

Your next move here is to apologize for omitting the facts and explain you just skimmed or to admit to yourself that you did it on purpose and change the way you post.

I'm pretty sure you quoted the wrong person, as this is the first time I addressed this.

 

[Blayt7hh]

But you'll just be a lying hack and pretend otherwise to defend whatever emotional problems you have.

Damn I thought you said you didn’t like punching down. Now you’re insulting me knowing I have emotional problems. Q_Q

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

Any logger or park ranger could retire a millionaire if they came across evidence of bigfoot this is a real dumb take.

Nu-uh. The government would NEVER allow it.

 

[Deleted member 577981]

I'm pretty sure you quoted the wrong person, as this is the first time I addressed this.

Yes I'm very sorry about that. I absolutely miss took you for another poster and I apologize.

And I do agree with your post. I'm just not sure how it's relevant to the discussion I'm having but I'm open to anything you have to say.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yes, it's terrible of me to want people to actually discuss things rather than lie and slander and mock. Arguing that being open to data and honest discussion about fringe topics is the scientific method is also a terrible thing to stand for. I can see why you're so angry.

Also, I don't care if anybody addresses my viewpoint. I just think that if they're going to discuss it with me they should address it. But I think that is just the definition of a discussion....

They could just as easily ignore my posts.

You launch ad hominem attacks at people, calling them liars and other names, and then you suggest people shouldn't respond to that if they don't want to respond to the rest of your spiel?

Are we going to play "Who started it" now, like a couple of 10 year olds?

The thread topic is "space is a hoax according to some" and there is zero need to take such a silly claim seriously. Ditto Bigfoot and Bigfoot's ghost. People experience all kinds of things and put labels on them to help conceptualize. That doesn't mean those labels reflect reality.

This Jungian mythology you refer to is no more than imagination masked as philosophy.

Ever notice mystics who reach trance states and see visions and what not are generally fasting during their meditations or, like the Oracles at Delphi, under the influence of something external?

I'm against giving air to things like this because it paves the way for snake oil salesmen to separate gullible people from their money. That and only that is my primary objection here.

So, I suggest you stop calling groups of people liars and stick to proving your case on an individual basis.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

Yes I'm very sorry about that. I absolutely miss took you for another poster and I apologize.

And I do agree with your post. I'm just not sure how it's relevant to the discussion I'm having but I'm open to anything you have to say.

No, you're really not. You've admitted as much. You've called others, and me, names for insinuating that you might be wrong. You've admitted that you can't be wrong about this for any other reason than the supernatural. You are a hypocrite who is either trolling, or really is that egotistical to think you are so much smarter than everyone else. Don't pretend you're open minded, you've completely proven that you are the exact opposite.

Keep getting your ass handed to you by the half-dozen guys in here. You're SOOOO much smarter than everyone else, but can't even keep your posts and responses organized. Keep digging buddy, you'll get there eventually.