Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[icemun]

No, I wouldn't say that I am.

Are you on the same page with him on some aspects he presented?

The Earth is flat, there is no space, and/or aspects of science are a hoax?

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Any explanation as to why the moon wasn't bright when the astronauts landed there? Did they have a light switch to turn it off before arriving? What about the stars? Should've been easier and clearer to see them being that much closer no? I noticed that stars were not visible from the moon footage.

They may have landed on the side that was yet to be illuminated by the sun.
Stars will not be visible if the much brighter moon is what the camera is focusing on. Imagine a spotlight in frame and a firefly right next to it; it’s impossible to resolve the less bright light amidst a brighter one.

 

[koquerelle]

it's actually quite rare to find anyone that is willing to really open-mindedly allow data on all topics.

There are limits. Why should I be open-minded about a subject that's been debunked dozens of ways?

 

[Copper Burner]

They may have landed on the side that was yet to be illuminated by the sun.
Stars will not be visible if the much brighter moon is what the camera is focusing on. Imagine a spotlight in frame and a firefly right next to it; it’s impossible to resolve the less bright light amidst a brighter one.

They say they were on both sides. They supposedly orbited the moon. Still, no stars anywhere in sight even being much closer to them and nothing visibly blocking them. They should've been able to see them from at least the darkside right?

Go and place a flashlight at the other side of a room in your house and aim it at you. Now walk your face towards that light. It's going to get brighter the closer you get. Scientifically, it's how every single light source behaves.

Imagine how much light power the moon is able to put out to be able to make a reflection on the earth's water from that far away. It can light up your path when walking in darkness. You're telling me that when you're right next to the moon that light isn't a million times brighter? It would blind a person. But nope. No pictures or footage of any parts of a super bright moon.

 

[Deleted member 577981]

*a priori

The question of Bigfoot got "its day in court", as it were, and it's made up. I'm not rehashing all that again with you only to have you dismiss everything as being because they're non-corporeal or some other fantastical crap. Been there, done that, likely before you were born. Your self-righteousness cracks me up though, so you do you but don't presume what I know* and what I don't know.

Yeah man... I'm 52 years old and YOU are the only one of us that continually comes in with mocking and emotionalism and doesn't address the arguments made. Most of your posts are just emotionalism in fact.

This topic has not been debunked and even if one wanted to argue a physical being as Jeff Meldrum does it can be done effectively and to pretend that science has debunked it just a kind of lie.


But if you don't want to rehash it with me anymore, I completely understand and my suggestion to you would be just not to respond to my posts... Nobody is making you and it wouldn't hurt my feelings if you didn't.

I find the entire topic of Bigfoot UFOs and the paranormal to be profoundly interesting on many, many levels physical, spiritual and psychological and so I'm always going to show up in these threads sharing my perspectives.

A non-corporeal or semicorporeal explanation is the one that I think best fits all the evidence and it's also one that Carl Jung very much believed in and I think he laid a good case for why and how it happens. His book, religion and psychology reveals clients with mental illnesses, knowing and having access to obscure mythological symbols that could not have possibly been known at the time by those people who spoke those languages.

To pretend there is no evidence for the paranormal or the spiritual is a kind of lie. It's only fair to say there isn't proof, but there's lots and lots of evidence and I think the Bigfoot phenomenon is one that suggests a semi corporeal presence of certain manifestations of mythology.

I think we are witnessing for the first time in history a global mythological manifestation rather than one confined to one particular region or culture. I don't know how anyone could not be fascinated least by that possibility.

But again, if you don't agree with that it's totally okay, but maybe you should just not respond to my posts...

 

[Deleted member 577981]

There are limits. Why should I be open-minded about a subject that's been debunked dozens of ways?

Because it's a lie that it has been debunked.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

I mean NASA did release the most blatantly fake images of all time only to retract them because they were clearly made on Paint so anything's on the table.

As long as they keep pumping out the lies though, eventually people will find one they want to believe.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

They say they were on both sides. They supposedly orbited the moon. Still, no stars anywhere in sight even being much closer to them and nothing visibly blocking them. They should've been able to see them from at least the darkside right?

Go and place a flashlight at the other side of a room in your house and aim it at you. Now walk your face towards that light. It's going to get brighter the closer you get. Scientifically, it's how every single light source behaves.

Imagine how much light power the moon is able to put out to be able to make a reflection on the earth's water from that far away. It can light up your path when walking in darkness. You're telling me that when you're right next to the moon that light isn't a million times brighter? It would blind a person. But nope. No pictures or footage of any parts of a super bright moon.

A light source can’t produce dark spots as is evident by the craters on the moon. The moon is covered by a highly reflective substance. If you shine a light at a mirror, it doesn’t make the mirror the source of light.
If it was a light source, there would never be a “new moon” or any phase for that matter.
Even being on the moon, which is approximately 240,000 miles from Earth, is a tiny fraction of the distance from the stars that we observe in the sky that are 4.5 light years away.

 

[Andy Capp]

They say they were on both sides. They supposedly orbited the moon. Still, no stars anywhere in sight even being much closer to them and nothing visibly blocking them. They should've been able to see them from at least the darkside right?

Go and place a flashlight at the other side of a room in your house and aim it at you. Now walk your face towards that light. It's going to get brighter the closer you get. Scientifically, it's how every single light source behaves.

Imagine how much light power the moon is able to put out to be able to make a reflection on the earth's water from that far away. It can light up your path when walking in darkness. You're telling me that when you're right next to the moon that light isn't a million times brighter? It would blind a person. But nope. No pictures or footage of any parts of a super bright moon.

The light from the earth is drowning out background stars. Ever try looking at a dim light that is far away while someone shines a flashlight in your face? Please go back and finish high school.

 

[Andy Capp]

As long as they keep pumping out the lies though, eventually people will find one they want to believe.

What lies, specifically?

 

[mixmastermo]

There is one advantage to having directly experienced things beyond what our current paradigm accepts as real and that is open-mindedness.

The other advantage is that it gives you a window into the way people think why they think the way they do and the profound bias that limits so many people because of their allegiance to what is already known.

It serves as a dark cloud on their mind, keeping them from even thinking openly about many things.

Just came here to say I can't hear dog whistles or see ultra violet

 

[Copper Burner]

A light source can’t produce dark spots as is evident by the craters on the moon. The moon is covered by a highly reflective substance. If you shine a light at a mirror, it doesn’t make the mirror the source of light.
If it was a light source, there would never be a “new moon” or any phase for that matter.
Even being on the moon, which is approximately 240,000 miles from Earth, is a tiny fraction of the distance from the stars that we observe in the sky that are 4.5 light years away.

Does it matter what the original source of light is? Does that make the moon any less bright?

I noticed that you completely skirted around the fact that up close, the light emanating from the moon would be absolutely blinding.

 

[Andy Capp]

Sigh. This guy. LOL

 

[Copper Burner]

The light from the earth is drowning out background stars. Ever try looking at a dim light that is far away while someone shines a flashlight in your face? Please go back and finish high school.

Lol..."the light from the earth blocks the stars when on the moon". Derr.

Wow, i simplified it as much as i could for angry frothing at the mouth science deniers and you still cannot grasp it. Then again
noone would expect a libtard to be able to comprehend simple real life scientific principles.

The adults were talking. Move along tardo.

 

[Deleted member 577981]

Just came here to say I can't hear dog whistles or see ultra violet

Ok.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Does it matter what the original source of light is? Does that make the moon any less bright?

I noticed that you completely skirted around the fact that up close, the light emanating from the moon would be absolutely blinding.

The original light source is the Sun.
It is a complicated answer, but the short version is that it would be negligibly brighter; just like if you were to walk closer to a mirror reflecting a light as the amount of photons hitting your eye would increase but the intensity of the light would not increase as your flashlight example wrongly stated.
If standing on the moon, more light would be reflecting from the earth than the moon’s surface.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Lol..."the light from the earth blocks the stars when on the moon". Derr.

Wow, i simplified it as much as i could for angry frothing at the mouth science deniers and you still cannot grasp it. Then again
noone would expect a libtard to be able to comprehend simple real life scientific principles.

The adults were talking. Move along tardo.

What Scientific principles are you speaking of? Please be specific.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yeah man... I'm 52 years old and YOU are the only one of us that continually comes in with mocking and emotionalism and doesn't address the arguments made. Most of your posts are just emotionalism in fact.

This topic has not been debunked and even if one wanted to argue a physical being as Jeff Meldrum does it can be done effectively and to pretend that science has debunked it just a kind of lie.


But if you don't want to rehash it with me anymore, I completely understand and my suggestion to you would be just not to respond to my posts... Nobody is making you and it wouldn't hurt my feelings if you didn't.

I find the entire topic of Bigfoot UFOs and the paranormal to be profoundly interesting on many, many levels physical, spiritual and psychological and so I'm always going to show up in these threads sharing my perspectives.

A non-corporeal or semicorporeal explanation is the one that I think best fits all the evidence and it's also one that Carl Jung very much believed in and I think he laid a good case for why and how it happens. His book, religion and psychology reveals clients with mental illnesses, knowing and having access to obscure mythological symbols that could not have possibly been known at the time by those people who spoke those languages.

To pretend there is no evidence for the paranormal or the spiritual is a kind of lie. It's only fair to say there isn't proof, but there's lots and lots of evidence and I think the Bigfoot phenomenon is one that suggests a semi corporeal presence of certain manifestations of mythology.

I think we are witnessing for the first time in history a global mythological manifestation rather than one confined to one particular region or culture. I don't know how anyone could not be fascinated least by that possibility.

But again, if you don't agree with that it's totally okay, but maybe you should just not respond to my posts...

Your reasoning is just plain bad. This has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with you.

But speaking of that, when you get into all this Jungian non-corporeal nonsense do you realize you're just rehashing the plot of a Harlan Ellison story from 40 or more years ago?

 

[mixmastermo]

Ok.

Meaning things exist beyond our natural perception so we shouldn't immediately discount theories based upon what we believe is established by science....

I am following your train of thought but not necessarily believing everything you have said in this thread 100%.

 

[Andy Capp]

Lol..."the light from the earth blocks the stars when on the moon". Derr.

Wow, i simplified it as much as i could for angry frothing at the mouth science deniers and you still cannot grasp it. Then again
noone would expect a libtard to be able to comprehend simple real life scientific principles.

The adults were talking. Move along tardo.

It didn't say it blocks anything, clownshoes. I said it drowns it out. Try this: light a candle in a darkened room, stand at the far end of the room from the candle, then shine a flashlight in your own face and then tell me if you can see the candle light.

I already explained this but I thought a second time around might help since you seem a little slow. Apparently you're actually a lot slow. LOL @ angry at you reveling in your stupidity. You don't appear capable of understanding what is being explained to you ITT, so it might pay to shut up now and quit embarrassing yourself.