Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[kflo]

For you.

lol. you think someone's last name is embarrassing................

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Yeah..
Of all the things that might be unfakeable..
footprints in the woods its not even in my top 10 list.

Absolute proof anything can be faked.

 

[kflo]

Yeah.. that right there is unfakeable.
You can take my word for it.

would he wear a sasquatch t-shirt if it wasn't real????

 

[lsa]

Since I seen the name

Jeffrey Meldrum, over and over and over..​

I had to do a quick and dirty google fu...
aaaand.. (my text got fucked up! Do read the paper and not my messy copy paste!!)

D. Jeffrey Meldrum is of the declared lineage ofEphraim, as are the remainder of his family with theexception of one sibling whose patriarchal blessingstates that he is of the tribe of Benjamin.Do Latter-day Saints whose patriarchal blessingsstate that they are of the tribe of Ephraim have anyIsraelite genetic markers? Would we expect them to?
After thousands of years, all were destroyed exceptthe Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestorsof the American Indians” is fully justified. AllNative Americans are in fact descended from these“Lamanites”—these “Gentiles” of the record ofNephi’s people. Lehi’s prophecy to Laman andLemuel was realized: their heritage of dissensioncontinued, and their legacy never died out—inthe Abrahamic sense or in the Buchanan context,even if their genetic markers may have.
Its from one of his other papers..

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1310&context=jbms

 

[LangfordBarrow]

would he wear a sasquatch t-shirt if it wasn't real????

I wonder if he made molds of the indentations this bigfoot's cane left as he was roaming around looking for berries.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

if one were to lay out all of the evidence of a flat earth in a straight line, it would circumnavigate the globe 3 and a half times.

 

[Blayt7hh]

Petty spicy Bigfoot thread.

I think this is actually my fault. I think I brought up Bigfoot first like a week ago thinking it would be accepted be everyone as not real when I was trying make an example.

Boy was I wrong…

 

[kflo]

I think this is actually my fault. I think I brought up Bigfoot first like a week ago thinking it would be accepted be everyone as not real when I was trying make an example.

Boy was I wrong…

Congrats.

if I knew it was going to take a Bigfoot turn, I would have been a lot more active!

 

[kflo]

I wonder if he made molds of the indentations this bigfoot's cane left as he was roaming around looking for berries.

I actually think that’s a mold of Paul “Bunion” Bunyan……

 

[Blayt7hh]

Congrats.

if I knew it was going to take a Bigfoot turn, I would have been a lot more active!

I expect an end of the year war room nomination for most epic thread derailment

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

I expect an end of the year war room nomination for most epic thread derailment

Signed.

 

[BearGrounds]

lol. you think someone's last name is embarrassing................

No, I think you thinking that proves something is embarrassing.

The name was simply hilariously ironic, and fitting.

 

[BearGrounds]

I expect an end of the year war room nomination for most epic thread derailment

Dudes are always coming at me in various threads about it, so here we are.

 

[Andy Capp]

Jeff meldrum has a scientific paper with information about Bigfoot in it he that is published in a legit scientific journal though.

You are, I guess pretending this proves he's a pseudoscientist which it doesn't obviously.

Also, I could do what you do and fail to reply to any of your points and just post new points of my own, but I'm not a dishonest poster like you are being.


@Andy Capp but also I want you to know that I'm going to read every single thing you posted and all of the related material sometime this evening or the next day.

I am genuinely interested.

Isn't it you who said earlier that making deliberate mis-statements is a kind of lying?

 

[Deleted member 577981]

Isn't it you who said earlier that making deliberate mis-statements is a kind of lying?

Yes, but I haven't made any. There's no proof whatsoever he's a pseudoscientist and also there's no proof whatsoever that it is unreasonable to think Bigfoot exists. And don't pretend that Jeff Meldrum tried to publish a false paper intentionally. That would be a kind of life from you. You don't know that you don't know anything about him.

Those are my two positions and they're both still reasonable even if you did find some problems with a paper they/he tried to publish. It would not be the first time someone had to go back and correct their work while trying to get a paper published.

And I've heard several scientists lie about meldrum and so it's not a lock just because you found somebody who disagrees with his approach. That's not any kind of proof.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yes, but I haven't made any. There's no proof whatsoever he's a pseudoscientist and also there's no proof whatsoever that it is unreasonable to think Bigfoot exists. And don't pretend that Jeff Meldrum tried to publish a false paper intentionally. That would be a kind of life from you. You don't know that you don't know anything about him.

Those are my two positions and they're both still reasonable even if you did find some problems with a paper they/he tried to publish. It would not be the first time someone had to go back and correct their work while trying to get a paper published.

And I've heard several scientists lie about meldrum and so it's not a lock just because you found somebody who disagrees with his approach. That's not any kind of proof.

Show me where I claimed he's a pseudoscientist or admit you're a liar. You're currently arguing against an assertion I didn't make--but you said I did--and you go on about other people?

Also, the last paragraph is clearly a lie as well--according to your "kind of" standards of lying.

Yeah, that's a great argument for taking you seriously.

Also,
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."
"The paper was repeatedly rejected because it had clear methodological and other issues."

 

[Andy Capp]

"The Ape Canyon story is more problematic than noted in the interview, as there’s a recently unearthed story about the whole event being the product of a prank played by a group of young men who spent the evening throwing stones and such at the cabin. It’s not difficult to imagine how this could have caused an escalating level of fear about unseen assailants."

 

[kflo]

No, I think you thinking that proves something is embarrassing.

The name was simply hilariously ironic, and fitting.

i didn't say it "proves" anything.

i think it captures the reaction most academics and people with brains have.

 

[BearGrounds]

i didn't say it "proves" anything.

i think it captures the reaction most academics and people with brains have.

It does, you're right about that. But the jokes on you guys.

 

[kflo]

It does, you're right about that. But the jokes on you guys.

if i meet my demise at the hands of a sasquatch while hiking in remote canadian rockies my last thoughts will probably be "beargrounds was right. jokes on me"...............or maybe i should say it out loud, in the chance they speak english and post on sherdog...............