Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[Fedora Millionankles]

You've got nothing that is backed by science that refutes what I've said.
Claiming an image is a real photo is not science. That's faith.

The picture of the ‘72 Blue Marble was taken with a modified Hasselblad 500EL, a Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens and a fixed shutter speed of 1/250 sec. and no viewfinder, Dr. Harrison Schmitt, the Lunar Module Pilot, maintains that he captured the Blue Marble photograph.
The negatives were scanned in and can be viewed through the NASA Image and Video library.
There you go, empirical evidence backed by Science, genius.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

The picture of the ‘72 Blue Marble was taken with a modified Hasselblad 500EL, a Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens and a fixed shutter speed of 1/250 sec. and no viewfinder, Dr. Harrison Schmitt, the Lunar Module Pilot, maintains that he captured the Blue Marble photograph.
The negatives were scanned in and can be viewed through the NASA Image and Video library.
There you go, empirical evidence backed by Science, genius.

He's going to say that if YOU didn't take the photo, then it's just faith that you are taking someone else's word for it.

Then he'll deflect to something else and call everyone names while stirring the pot. Best to stop feeding the known troll.

 

[Chad R. Thundercock]

Good God, Flat Earthers. Give it a rest.

Go sail around in the ocean until you fall off at the edge of the world or something.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

He's going to say that if YOU didn't take the photo, then it's just faith that you are taking someone else's word for it.

Then he'll deflect to something else and call everyone names while stirring the pot. Best to stop feeding the known troll.

Amazing how Flerfs and other deniers dont “believe” in Science, yet have no problem using all the inventions and modern conveniences that Science has produced without seeing their hypocrisy.

 

[Chad R. Thundercock]

Amazing how Flerfs and other deniers dont “believe” in Science, yet have no problem using all the inventions and modern conveniences that Science has produced without seeing their hypocrisy.

I feel like there should be a law that strips away the right to use modern technology (cell phones, satellite TV/internet, airplanes, etc) from those who promote Flat Earth Theory. I know it's autocratic, but these people need a taste of their own medicine.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Deleted

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Ill sign that petition. lol

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

The picture of the ‘72 Blue Marble was taken with a modified Hasselblad 500EL, a Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens and a fixed shutter speed of 1/250 sec. and no viewfinder, Dr. Harrison Schmitt, the Lunar Module Pilot, maintains that he captured the Blue Marble photograph.
The negatives were scanned in and can be viewed through the NASA Image and Video library.
There you go, empirical evidence backed by Science, genius.

So because NASA tell you something is true, it backs up the things that people dispute to be true from NASA?
Telling you it was taken by a camera and saying they have negatives is what you accept as evidence? Wow.
You can't confirm or have that claim confirmed beyond all doubt. So why use it as an argument?
They can't even agree on who fucking took that photo
Damn you're a dumbass.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

The picture of the ‘72 Blue Marble was taken with a modified Hasselblad 500EL, a Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 lens and a fixed shutter speed of 1/250 sec. and no viewfinder, Dr. Harrison Schmitt, the Lunar Module Pilot, maintains that he captured the Blue Marble photograph.
The negatives were scanned in and can be viewed through the NASA Image and Video library.
There you go, empirical evidence backed by Science, genius.

^^ called it!

 

[Andy Capp]

You've got nothing that is backed by science that refutes what I've said.
Claiming an image is a real photo is not science. That's faith.

What about the photos I took and posted ITT? Are they fake?

 

[Andy Capp]

He's going to say that if YOU didn't take the photo, then it's just faith that you are taking someone else's word for it.

Then he'll deflect to something else and call everyone names while stirring the pot. Best to stop feeding the known troll.

Ok but see above. How's he going to address my photo of the moon with the sun on the opposite side of the earth? Where the fuck did the sun go? Did the entire earth go dark at the same time and on one noticed?

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

What about the photos I took and posted ITT? Are they fake?

I don't even know what you're referring to.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

He's going to say that if YOU didn't take the photo, then it's just faith that you are taking someone else's word for it.

Then he'll deflect to something else and call everyone names while stirring the pot. Best to stop feeding the known troll.

No bellend.
What I'm saying is that just because NASA say something, it doesn't become true. Especially as this whole thread is pretty much based around apparent NASA lies and bullshit. How is that not obvious? Yet you somehow see NASA claiming something as evidence against the claim that they lie and manipulate. That's just retarded. That's like me saying evidence of God existing is the fact the church say he exists.

And when are you planning to address your clueless statement about laser beams that I had to school you on the other day? Or will you just keep acting like you didn't say something laughably stupid?

 

[OneOfOne]

Amazing how Flerfs and other deniers dont “believe” in Science, yet have no problem using all the inventions and modern conveniences that Science has produced without seeing their hypocrisy.

Science =/= heliocentrism

 

[OneOfOne]

Ill sign that petition. lol

"Oh you don't believe the earth is a globe? No automobiles for you!"

You don't see how batshit crazy that sounds?

 

[BearGrounds]

So because NASA tell you something is true, it backs up the things that people dispute to be true from NASA?
Telling you it was taken by a camera and saying they have negatives is what you accept as evidence? Wow.
You can't confirm or have that claim confirmed beyond all doubt. So why use it as an argument?
They can't even agree on who fucking took that photo
Damn you're a dumbass.

People are very trusting of an organization that harbored Nazi war criminals.

Personally, I think it makes sense to be wary of them as a baseline.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Science =/= heliocentrism

All of Science says the earth is not flat or geocentric. Technical fields say the earth is curved. Long distance navigation takes into account earth curve.
Science backs heliocentrism and it’s on you prove otherwise.
Science demonstrates that space is real.
You are Scientifically illiterate.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

People are very trusting of an organization that harbored Nazi war criminals.

Personally, I think it makes sense to be wary of them as a baseline.

What about all the other space agencies? Are they all part of some grand conspiracy as well?

 

[BearGrounds]

What about all the other space agencies? Are they all part of some grand conspiracy as well?

I don't think the earth is flat.

I also don't think NASA should be given unwavering trust, do you?

 

[OneOfOne]

All of Science says the earth is not flat or geocentric. Technical fields say the earth is curved. Long distance navigation takes into account earth curve.
Science backs heliocentrism and it’s on you prove otherwise.
Science demonstrates that space is real.
You are Scientifically illiterate.

You guys claimed we can watch ships sail over the curve. But when you pull out binoculars you can bring those ships back in focus. Its on you to prove the curve even exists.