Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[markg171]

Can you provide me with all the websites you frequent that post only RAW image files? Curious where you get your news.

You still haven't shown us a RAW photo of the Wuhan virus lab you said exists. So we're going to assume that you fell for a fake by your logic.

You're doing great buddy

 

[shockaholic12]

You're doing great buddy

If the lab was real and they don't need to fake it why wouldn't there be RAW photos of it? Just following your logic

 

[LangfordBarrow]

It's claimed to be a real image taken by Nasa. And im not some space is faker or the earth is flat guy. I have my questions about all the spinning and shit but that's because I'm curious and it sounds unbelievable. But that picture..... is so fake. And Nasa says it's real.

I watched the video and it does look real to me. You can see how the focus is on the Earth and the features on the Moon are more out of focus. The Moon is tidally locked so it rotates at the same rate that it orbits us and we always see the same side. It's also very far away from us so zoomed in on the Earth you'd expect it to pass straight across the frame the way it did. The Earth seemed to be rotating normally so not sure what you mean by spinning. What part exactly looks fake to you?

 

[Copper Burner]

What are you talking about? Yes I did - I provided a link that showed the source as a YouTube video, and a link to said YouTube video. If you've got evidence it was posted somewhere before that, show it.

OK, I thought you had posted the same link that was incorrect. I went back to review, the second link does identify the source, however the music and tilt of the camera on the moon are different. Of course we know they are both fake, so someone may have used the original video's visuals and edited it. Or it was the original creator that edited it. But it definitely not the same actual vid.

Nice work sherbro. You make me proud.

 

[helltoupee]

It's black bears, dude. Sorry. If every other large mammal in North America is threatened with habitat loss because of people except for protected species, why aren't we running into these bastards on the daily for the same reason?

Edit:
Think of it this way. When people are in the woods and the see a black bear, they think, oh, that's a black bear. When people see a large hairy thing and know nothing of what black bears look like in real life, will they think, oh, that's likely bear, or hey, that's Bigfoot?

Most likely a mix of the two, don'tcha think?

This is to reply to your edit.

Certainly I could understand the scenario you laid out as happening a lot of the time. On the other hand, I'm just not confident in saying absolutely 100% of all supposed bigfoot sightings are fake or mis-identified black bears. Even if most bigfoot reports fall under this category, that still leaves a certain percentage that is unexplained. Certainly, the kind of people who grew up and/or hunt and camp in the woods are very aware of tracking certain animals, etc., and know what black bears look like. They seem to be pretty adamant of what they saw, and often the description is quite a bit different that what a bear looks and acts like. Some even have video and audio of the vocalizations which anyone can run through a spectrum analyzer and come to the same conclusions that humans cannot produce those particular frequencies. Could they be put ons, or fakes, sure, but again, I just have a difficult time committing to an absolute and saying 100% are fake.

I don't know what it is, but something is happening to either cause people to collectively hallucinate (in corroborated reports of more than 1 person), or it's some kind of collective unconscious archetype (Jung). Maybe densely packed forests have some kind of endogenous psychedelic that we don't know about and that is what is causing the phenomena - I just don't know.

 

[Andy Capp]

This is to reply to your edit.

Certainly I could understand the scenario you laid out as happening a lot of the time. On the other hand, I'm just not confident in saying absolutely 100% of all supposed bigfoot sightings are fake or mis-identified black bears. Even if most bigfoot reports fall under this category, that still leaves a certain percentage that is unexplained. Certainly, the kind of people who grew up and/or hunt and camp in the woods are very aware of tracking certain animals, etc., and know what black bears look like. They seem to be pretty adamant of what they saw, and often the description is quite a bit different that what a bear looks and acts like. Some even have video and audio of the vocalizations which anyone can run through a spectrum analyzer and come to the same conclusions that humans cannot produce those particular frequencies. Could they be put ons, or fakes, sure, but again, I just have a difficult time committing to an absolute and saying 100% are fake.

I don't know what it is, but something is happening to either cause people to collectively hallucinate (in corroborated reports of more than 1 person), or it's some kind of collective unconscious archetype (Jung). Maybe densely packed forests have some kind of endogenous psychedelic that we don't know about and that is what is causing the phenomena - I just don't know.

It obviously can't be ruled out since you can't prove a negative but I don't buy it. Give me a carcass, a skull, any physical evidence whatsoever, and I'll hop on board the legit inquiry train. Until then it's all just to drive page hits and video views to me.

 

[Andy Capp]

Please, go ahead and explain your point here so we can point and laugh at your total lack of understanding about how photography works. See if you can do it without asking some other moron on twitter for help.

I'll wait right here. When you get back you should be prepared to explain what makes you think there isn't a difference between taking a picture of the background stars where the earth is mostly obscured by the moon, and taking a picture with the fully sun-lit earth filling the foreground?

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

So, if you can't understand how it works, then it must be fake. Thanks for letting us ALL know that it's completely pointless to talk to you. Take some remedial science classes and then come back and we'll let you talk to the adult

So, if you can't understand how it works, then it must be fake. Thanks for letting us ALL know that it's completely pointless to talk to you. Take some remedial science classes and then come back and we'll let you talk to the adults. Until then... byeeeee.

Nothing that I just said is questioned by an understanding of how it works. The point is, my argument that someone could claim the laser is simply reflected off the moon itself rather than the reflectors still stands. Not to mention the fact that laser beam that is sent from Earth to the moon spreads out over a large area, resulting in a huge loss of signal strength. By the time the beam reaches the moon and reflects back, it is extremely weak. This can make it challenging to detect and measure it accurately, especially over long distances. Add that to the effects of atmospheric lensing and the distortion it creates, I am still scratching my head as to why this is used as the basis of someone's argument of evidence that we went to the moon.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

Nothing that I just said is questioned by an understanding of how it works. The point is, my argument that someone could claim the laser is simply reflected off the moon itself rather than the reflectors still stands. Not to mention the fact that laser beam that is sent from Earth to the moon spreads out over a large area, resulting in a huge loss of signal strength. By the time the beam reaches the moon and reflects back, it is extremely weak. This can make it challenging to detect and measure it accurately, especially over long distances. Add that to the effects of atmospheric lensing and the distortion it creates, I am still scratching my head as to why this is used as the basis of someone's argument of evidence that we went to the moon.

Just keep telling us you know NOTHING about the subject matter you're trying to speak on. For the rest of us, it's hilarious.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

Just keep telling us you know NOTHING about the subject matter you're trying to speak on. For the rest of us, it's hilarious.

Still waiting for you to give your reasoning against what I'm saying is wrong instead of just peppering insults and chants of 'you're so silleh you know nothing'.
Or are you simply going to blabber on about how the mirrors always reflect back to the source?
And.....?

Your highlighted part of my post is actually true. Why do you take issue with it?

 

[markg171]

If the lab was real and they don't need to fake it why wouldn't there be RAW photos of it? Just following your logic

You seem very keen on Photoshop so I'm guess you use it a lot for your Instagram

 

[AZ103]

I watched the video and it does look real to me. You can see how the focus is on the Earth and the features on the Moon are more out of focus. The Moon is tidally locked so it rotates at the same rate that it orbits us and we always see the same side. It's also very far away from us so zoomed in on the Earth you'd expect it to pass straight across the frame the way it did. The Earth seemed to be rotating normally so not sure what you mean by spinning. What part exactly looks fake to you?

When I mentioned the spinning I meant all the ai models of the entire universe spinning and spiraling through space and past God knows what in the background. Again I'm not denying anything at all I'm just looking at things and if they don't make sense that's what I'm saying. I still find that picture and video to look pretty fake and shitty and would put myself at a coin flip on wether it's real as they release a lot of rendered photos and junk .

 

[Joe]

This thread has been nothing but a 20+ page treatise of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

For the record I believe the Earth is round.

I dont know how something works so therefore conspiracy! its okay to admit you arent an expert on something. Watching a youtube video doesnt make you an expert.

 

[Satur9]

The dude once gave his number out and you could call him. And sometimes he really did answer... He never was one for thinking things through.

 

[dirtypablo]

It's silly to waste your time with this clown, I think. I proved he is a liar and a moron so now he goes around calling people morons and liars. It's sad and hilarious at the same time, but, for me at least, it grew tiresome rather quickly.

I mean.. its silly to waste time on any of this, but here we are..

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

Still waiting for you to give your reasoning against what I'm saying is wrong instead of just peppering insults and chants of 'you're so silleh you know nothing'.
Or are you simply going to blabber on about how the mirrors always reflect back to the source?
And.....?

Your highlighted part of my post is actually true. Why do you take issue with it?

That's okay. I'm still waiting on you to tell me why the USSR would foolishly choose to lie about putting their own reflectors on the moon instead of just asking you to show them how NASA didn't actually do it.

And Japan.

And China.

While you're correct that the particles of lasers disperse, your lack of knowledge about how they disperse and are read over long distances, isn't something that can just be explained to an ignoramus on sherdog. Again... go down to your local university and take a couple of entry level science courses or speak to someone who is smarter than you (which shouldn't be hard to find.) Of course, you'll just come back and let us all know that are full of it, because they are in on the lie.

Seriously, though, ignorance is bliss, so we're all sure you're going to have a GREAT day.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

I dont know how something works so therefore conspiracy! its okay to admit you arent an expert on something. Watching a youtube video doesnt make you an expert.

How dare you belittle all the YouTube University students out there. Someone said it, and the comments on the video agreed. What more proof do you need?!

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Yeah yeah whatever. Don't really care, it's still not something just anyone can do like the previous post claimed.
Aside from that, it could easily be argued that given the moon clearly reflects a lot of light, that it's actually the moon that is reflecting the laser and not the mirrors.
The earth is said to turn at around 1000mph, and the moon moves through it's orbit at a speed visible to the naked eye, yet you want to claim it's a playstation sized mirror that is directly reflecting the laser back. Hitting it would be one thing. Staying locked onto it would be another. But maintaining that exact angle so the light precisely reflects the beam straight back over that distance?
Get the fuck outta here.

So every experiment of all time needs to be able to be done by everyone, everywhere for it to be valid?! Terrible logic.
Just because you don’t understand Science or experiments doesn’t make it invalid; it simple means youre uneducated.
Btw the way, the fact that you don’t understand how to measure rotation, which is not in MPH but RPM, means you are completely unqualified to have this conversation.
How did you get so confident in your ignorance?

 

[Andy Capp]

I mean.. its silly to waste time on any of this, but here we are..

Yes, but there are levels to this shit, wouldn't you say?

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

So every experiment of all time needs to be able to be done by everyone, everywhere for it to be valid?! Terrible logic.
Just because you don’t understand Science or experiments doesn’t make it invalid; it simple means youre uneducated.
Btw the way, the fact that you don’t understand how to measure rotation, which is not in MPH but RPM, means you are completely unqualified to have this conversation.
How did you get so confident in your ignorance?

Why are you asking him even more questions that he can't answer. He's already having a tough time.