Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[Joe]

Its hilarious how confident lunatics who believe every ct they come across think they are smarter than everyone else

 

[Chad R. Thundercock]

Its hilarious how confident lunatics who believe every ct they come across think they are smarter than everyone else

This thread has been nothing but a 20+ page treatise of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

For the record I believe the Earth is round.

 

[BearGrounds]

Its hilarious how confident lunatics who believe every ct they come across think they are smarter than everyone else

Who believes every CT that they come across?

Oh, never mind, what we have here is just another false claim by a science person.

Keep em coming.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

This thread has been nothing but a 20+ page treatise of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

For the record I believe the Earth is round.

The Thicc Earth Society would like to have a word with you

 

[dirtypablo]

But I already supplied evidence, so right off of the bat you're being dishonest here.

Evidence, since you seem not to understand this (along with multiple other fake science people in here), doesn't have to constitute proof in order to support a phenomenona.

But that's just what you guys do. Ignore evidence, say it's not proof, then claim that there isn't any. Science frauds, all of you.

You have not provided evidence of what you claimed. Just because you believe it to be evidence doesn't mean it is. We're not saying it's not proof, we're saying it's not evidence of the existence of ftl/bigfoot, because it's not.

What you've provided as evidence of a faster than light craft or bigfoot is equivalent to a sketchbook of unicorn drawings being evidence that unicorns exist. You're easily fooled by nonsense and don't know how to process information so you think the sketches of unicorns you have provided constitute evidence, but they don't.

 

[PBAC]

This one is based in Adventism, the idea that God placed the stars in the sky as a display of power.

 

[BearGrounds]

You have not provided evidence of what you claimed. Just because you believe it to be evidence doesn't mean it is. We're not saying it's not proof, we're saying it's not evidence of the existence of ftl/bigfoot, because it's not.

What you've provided as evidence of a faster than light craft or bigfoot is equivalent to a sketchbook of unicorn drawings being evidence that unicorns exist. You're easily fooled by nonsense and don't know how to process information so you think the sketches of unicorns you have provided constitute evidence, but they don't.

Yes, it is evidence, to anyone who is scientifically minded. It isn't to biased frauds.

Track ways indicate animal activity. I linked an academic paper, by an expert, examining track evidence (that I can almost guarantee you just ignored and never read). It's never been debunked. It stands as evidence whether you like it or not, that's how science works.

You guys are all terrible excuses for science people. You're still equating a phenomena with serious government involvement and investigation over decades to unicorns. You're biased to the point of self rendered retardation.

You should have bowed out after trying to use the site I randomly pulled an image from to desparage me because you had nothing else.

 

[Copper Burner]

Here you go. You're correct, the original link I provided wasn't the video you shared - the image style is exactly the same, so I assumed that news organization had made it, but it was from a youtube video. Unlike you, I can admit when I was mistaken about something. Now, can you admit the video wasn't posted by NASA or ISRO?

Fact-Check: Digitally-Created Video Shared as Footage From Chandrayaan-3

A digitally-created video claiming to show ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 footage of the Earth from the moon is going viral. The video has been debunked as old stock footage.

www.thequint.com

No, because it was. It's on you to prove me wrong. You tried once already and admitted you were wrong, which I respect.

Give it another go sherbro. Unlike Andy Capp, I will be a man and admit if I'm wrong as well.

 

[Blayt7hh]

Still failing. Evidence isn't debunked just because you say it is, you actually have to do the work (which you, nor any of you self proclaimed science people have done), anti-science man.

Meanwhile, you remain as a glaring example, and proof positive, that those who fancy themselves as science people, are actually just complete frauds. You have a preconceived conclusion you cannot depart from mentally, which is known, in science circles, as bias.

Thanks for being the proof of my point. You @Blayt7hh, @no fat chicks, and the rest of your CT hating support group. You guys couldn't have done a better job at making the science people look terribly unfit to refer to themselves as such.

Yeah we are frauds because we didn’t believe your clearly fake video. Science is accepting faked evidence.

You know how dumb that sounds?

 

[BearGrounds]

Yeah we are frauds because we didn’t believe your clearly fake video. Science is accepting faked evidence.

You know how dumb that sounds?

How's it clearly faked? Did you go back and realize that that's not a frame skip?

Your main points of contention with it were trashing the random YT hosting account, and the above, which isn't sufficient for actual science.

Oh, you also claimed that nobody else saw it, which you couldn't even possibly know.

 

[Blayt7hh]

How's it clearly faked? Did you go back and realize that that's not a frame skip?

Your main points of contention with it were trashing the random YT hosting account, and the above, which isn't sufficient for actual science.

Oh, you also claimed that nobody else saw it, which you couldn't even possibly know.

Lmao yeah it’s definitely an edit. Also I did just go back and watched it and this time noticed how the giant ball of light didn’t change the shading of the ship at all. So now I’ve found three major flaws in two watches. Don’t waste my time anymore

I did make that claim that no one else saw it, and here you are essentially asking me to prove a negative again. Why don’t you instead prove me wrong and share some first hand accounts of this sighting. I would try to google it but you know the location isn’t even shared anywhere

God damn you’re a sucker man. There’s no part of science that says we have to accept your falsified evidence. And this is clearly faked

 

[BearGrounds]

Lmao yeah it’s definitely an edit. Also I did just go back and watched it and this time noticed how the giant ball of light didn’t change the shading of the ship at all. So now I’ve found three major flaws in two watches. Don’t waste my time anymore

I did make that claim that no one else saw it, and here you are essentially asking me to prove a negative again. Why don’t you instead prove me wrong and share some first hand accounts of this sighting. I would try to google it but you know the location isn’t even shared anywhere

God damn you’re a sucker man. There’s no part of science that says we have to accept your falsified evidence. And this is clearly faked

It's not an edit (it's what you see when the field/pocket is generated by the craft). We disagree on that. Now you're moving to some shading nonsense. It isn't fake just because you don't believe it.

Just making that claim is stupid in the first place. There's plenty of eyewitness accounts of the thing (and similar craft), even if not on that night by anybody else.

I could easily call you a complete sucker for falling for the coverup of such goings-on and craft in our airspace. It's clearly being kept secret.

 

[dirtypablo]

No, because it was. It's on you to prove me wrong. You tried once already and admitted you were wrong, which I respect.

Give it another go sherbro. Unlike Andy Capp, I will be a man and admit if I'm wrong as well.

Lol, for your sake I really hope you're trolling. Its not on me to prove you wrong - you made a random claim with absolutely no support behind it, and I've shown you the origin of the video. Its now up to YOU to show me something that links the video to NASA or IRSO.

 

[Blayt7hh]

It's not an edit. We disagree on that. Now you're moving to some shading nonsense. It isn't fake just because you don't believe it.

Just making that claim is stupid in the first place. There's plenty of eyewitness accounts of the thing (and similar craft), even if not on that night by anybody else.

I could easily call you a complete sucker for falling for the coverup of such goings-on and craft in our airspace. It's clearly being kept secret.

Some shading nonsense… you don’t think that a giant ball of light suddenly appearing would change the lighting of the ship? Where is there an authenticated version of this video by some experts? Let me guess, all the experts are in the take

Enough talk. What city was this? Where are accounts of other people who saw it? If it was over a god damn city and was a massive ball of light it should be easy to find these accounts.

I know other people have made these claims. That’s why the author of this video chose that shape.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

I know the difference
The point I'm making is that people think that the theory of gravity explains what gravity is, but it doesn't. It only predicts how gravity behaves and there's a big difference and I think that's a difference that people need to know about so I always point it out.

I'm defending scientific accuracy not trying to debunk science here just so you know.

But I already supplied evidence, so right off of the bat you're being dishonest here.

Evidence, since you seem not to understand this (along with multiple other fake science people in here), doesn't have to constitute proof in order to support a phenomenona.

But that's just what you guys do. Ignore evidence, say it's not proof, then claim that there isn't any. Science frauds, all of you.

Science doesn’t prove things and as a scientist, I follow where the experimentations and evidence leads me, unlike Flerfs.

 

[BearGrounds]

Science doesn’t prove things and as a scientist, I follow where the experimentations and evidence leads me, unlike Flerfs.

Then take your fraudulent ass into the woods and do a field study, or STFU.

 

[BearGrounds]

Some shading nonsense… you don’t think that a giant ball of light suddenly appearing would change the lighting of the ship? Where is there an authenticated version of this video by some experts? Let me guess, all the experts are in the take

Enough talk. What city was this? Where are accounts of other people who saw it? If it was over a god damn city and was a massive ball of light it should be easy to find these accounts.

I know other people have made these claims. That’s why the author of this video chose that shape.

It's night vision and the craft uses, as is presumed, some manner of lead based deep black paint for the purpose of shielding the operators from harmful radiation. Timestamped:



Perhaps you're mistaken?



Added to that, the light effect may not be a flash as you presume it is.

 

[dirtypablo]

Yes, it is evidence, to anyone who is scientifically minded. It isn't to biased frauds.

Track ways indicate animal activity. I linked an academic paper, by an expert, examining track evidence (that I can almost guarantee you just ignored and never read). It's never been debunked. It stands as evidence whether you like it or not, that's how science works.

You guys are all terrible excuses for science people. You're still equating a phenomena with serious government involvement and investigation over decades to unicorns. You're biased to the point of self rendered retardation.

You should have bowed out after trying to use the site I randomly pulled an image from to desparage me because you had nothing else.

We were discussing the subject of FTL craft. There's no reason for me to review any of the bigfoot stuff you posted when what you've posted about the evidence for the existence of FTL craft is such nonsense.

I'm equating the quality of evidence you have provided for the existence of FTL craft with the evidence for unicorns. You aren't claiming the government has investigated the subject, you're claiming they have build a craft. Because you know nothing about physics, engineering, or how government programs like that operate, you have absolutely no idea of the depth and width of the gap between, the government looked in to this and the government has achieved this. The gap is similar to the gap between, here's a sketch of a unicorn, and unicorns exist.

 

[KnockoutsGalore]

Its hilarious how confident lunatics who believe every ct they come across think they are smarter than everyone else

And, in the face of evidence, they just say 'nope'. They know better...

 

[Chad R. Thundercock]

The Thicc Earth Society would like to have a word with you

!Ay, coño! Me encanta cómo Ecuador es el ano del mundo.