- Joined
- Jan 16, 2007
- Messages
- 10,603
- Reaction score
- 7,158
It really isn't and actually attacks the heart of your position. You basically have blinders on with respect to every other action (eating shit for instance) but are trying to convince everyone that observed homosexual acts are part and parcel of intelligent design hence the whole "it's been observed in intelligent animals" schtick.
Basically, you're trying your hardest to make it seem like animals are legit gay because the behaviour has been observed while disparaging everything else, to a point where you asked for studies quantifying the rate at which animals eat shit.
The only one who's getting emotional here is you. You aren't fooling anyone with your "objectivity" by hiding behind a study that observed a behavior we all agree happens in nature because you have no answer for the other appalling shit that happens along with it, and yes that includes rape.
Lol at going from “I’m not reading your post” memes to reading my replies to other posters and quoting them. You truly are my biggest fan boy.
This is like the 10th time you have mentioned shit eating while failing to show any evidence it’s common behavior in highly intelligent species. I don’t think it is. I think you have some fetish about eating shit or something and are projecting. Either way I’m sure you made it up.
Quote what else I’m “disparaging”. I’ve argued against people stating nature exhibits such and such if they don’t include research. I’ve never said all traits of these species are translatable to ours with positive results. That doesn’t mean none of them are either though. So we look at the traits, whether they are common in the species most similar to us (they are) whether they have positive effects (scientific theories side on them likely having social benefits) and then I conclude no, this behavior is not anti-evolution, or anti-survival, or a perversion nature of any kind like conservatives have argued.
If you want to focus on violence and infanticide as traits those are completely separate ones we can study and discuss on another thread. But the existence of them doesn’t make gay behavior negative suddenly.
I’m getting emotional lol? You tagged me in this theead twice, then screeched “I’m not reading your post” when you got stumped, then logged back in to read more of my posts and replied to them hahaha