Putin makes Holocaust denial a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in jail.

[uptheirons!]

Not a surprise you can't work a simple google search. For those reading this, the rebuttal from real scientists are out there, are easy to find. Uptheirons is being intellectually dishonest here (to put it charitably).

Why are you so scared of his conclusions? What are you actually arguing here? Do you think he doesn't have the right to free speech with regards to this topic?

 

[Gandhi]

Moron, you wrote HIS faculty. Learn to write properly you fucking dump truck.

Yes I wrote his faculty, what's your point crackhead.

In 2006, sixty of Butz's colleagues from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science faculty signed a censure describing Butz's Holocaust denial as "an affront to our humanity and our standards as scholars".

Yet you say they should be ignored because they did not write a book on the subject. Yet he should be trusted because he has the same credentials and wrote a book, and other people that "wrote books" should at the same time be ignored. Stupid circular nonsense. You are an idiot plan and simple.

 

[Gandhi]

Why are you so scared of his conclusions? What are you actually arguing here? Do you think he doesn't have the right to free speech with regards to this topic?

- Not scared
- Arguing he is not qualified and his work is not sound
- Yes, he has a right to free speech
- No, you can't follow an argument

 

[Rematch]

Who the fuck answered "yes"? Imprisoning people for merely stating disagreement with a generally accepted thought is as Orwellian/Inquisition/Jihadi/Communist as it gets.

 

[uptheirons!]

Yes I wrote his faculty, what's your point crackhead.

In 2006, sixty of Butz's colleagues from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science faculty signed a censure describing Butz's Holocaust denial as "an affront to our humanity and our standards as scholars".

Yet you say they should be ignored because they did not write a book on the subject. Yet he should be trusted because he has the same credentials and wrote a book, and other people that "wrote books" should at the same time be ignored. Stupid circular nonsense. You are an idiot plan and simple.

And what part of that statement claims that they studied the subject? You really are a fucking dump truck <45><45>

Why are you so scared of his book? If it's all bs then laugh it off and move. The fact that you're so defensive makes you look extremely unsure of your position, sweetheart.

 

[uptheirons!]

- Not scared
- Arguing he is not qualified and his work is not sound
- Yes, he has a right to free speech
- No, you can't follow an argument

Yet you have no evidence to disprove his findings. Gotcha.

 

[Gandhi]

And what part of that statement claims that they studied the subject? You really are a fucking dump truck <45><45>

Why are you so scared of his book? If it's all bs then laugh it off and move. The fact that you're so defensive makes you look extremely unsure of your position, sweetheart.

.

And you constantly projecting your emotions onto others makes you come across like a teenage girl.

 

[Gandhi]

Yet you have no evidence to disprove his findings. Gotcha.

Ample studies out there done by real scientists that show his study was scientifically a joke. You can pretend they don't exist if that keeps your fragile world view intact.

 

[HomerThompson]

Is the Holocaust a hoax yet?

 

[uptheirons!]

You constantly projecting your emotions onto others makes you come across like a teenage girl.

You constantly crying about people who's opinions differ from you makes you come across like an insecure twat.

 

[uptheirons!]

Ample studies out there done by real scientists that show his study was scientifically a joke. You can pretend they don't exist if that keeps your fragile world view intact.

Ample, yet you can't show one. <Lmaoo>

 

[Gandhi]

You constantly crying about people who's opinions differ from you makes you come across like an insecure twat.

I am just saying your opinion sucks, you are the one crying about crying and making up straw man to argue against. Why don't ask if I am for his free speech to be an idiot for a tenth time?

Again when someone writes a book you automatically confer them the title of expert, and others with the exact same qualification have their opinions discounted. because what, they did not write a book report on the subject? And then you ignore all the others out there, who are experts, and have written books.

You are a real joke

 

[uptheirons!]

I am just saying your opinion sucks, you are the one crying about crying and making up straw man to argue against. Why don't ask if I am for his free speech to be an idiot for a tenth time?

Again when someone writes a book you automatically confer them the title of expert, and others with the exact same qualification have their opinions discounted. because what, they did not write a book report on the subject? And then you ignore all the others out there, who are experts, and have written books.

You are a real joke

I don't ignore anything, I think both sides should be heard.

 

[Gandhi]

Ample, yet you can't show one. <Lmaoo>

No dummy

- Because your logical errors have already been pointed out such that you are a laughing stock to anybody with a minimum sense of perception

- Because you asked for @JosephDredd to provide a list of denial academics that were unqualified and/or hateful, I provided one, and you responded by cherry picking the list, moving the goal post and arguing like a a dog chasing his own tail

I have decided to not post the material that is readily out there because you would just follow the above course and post a stream of holocaust denialist crap, calling those studies into question while defending you own.

You have received way more airtime that you deserve and enough has been said for any decent reader to know you have been exposed without me litigating with you the literature that exposes the incompetent nature of that study.

So I'll restrict my comments to your current inability to gaps the circular nature of your arguments and if you think its BS, why don't you take your own advise and move on.

 

[Gandhi]

I don't ignore anything, I think both sides should be heard.

Straw man, I am obv. taking about judging the merits of the arguments not free speech.

 

[uptheirons!]

No dummy

- Because your logical errors have already been pointed out such that you are a laughing stock to anybody with a minimum sense of perception

- Because you asked for @JosephDredd to provide a list of denial academics that were unqualified and/or hateful, I provided one, and you responded by cherry picking the list, moving the goal post and arguing like a a dog chasing his own tail

I have decided to not post the material that is readily out there because you would just follow the above course and post a stream of holocaust denialist crap, calling those studies into question while defending you own.

You have received way more airtime that you deserve and enough has been said for any decent reader to know you have been exposed without me litigating with you the literature that exposes the incompetent nature of that study.

So I'll restrict my comments to your current inability to gaps the circular nature of your arguments and if you think its BS, why don't you take your own advise and move on.

So you have no evidence, gotcha.

When two names immediately stuck out in the list that had no hate attributed to them there's no point going through the others.

 

[uptheirons!]

Straw man, I am obv. taking about judging the merits of the arguments not free speech.

The merits of the arguments are never addressed because those asking questions are immediately branded as racists, which is the typical action of someone too scared to debate/discuss something.

 

[Deleted member 429137]

No dummy

- Because your logical errors have already been pointed out such that you are a laughing stock to anybody with a minimum sense of perception

- Because you asked for @JosephDredd to provide a list of denial academics that were unqualified and/or hateful, I provided one, and you responded by cherry picking the list, moving the goal post and arguing like a a dog chasing his own tail

I have decided to not post the material that is readily out there because you would just follow the above course and post a stream of holocaust denialist crap, calling those studies into question while defending you own.

You have received way more airtime that you deserve and enough has been said for any decent reader to know you have been exposed without me litigating with you the literature that exposes the incompetent nature of that study.

So I'll restrict my comments to your current inability to gaps the circular nature of your arguments and if you think its BS, why don't you take your own advise and move on.

I stopped talking to him when he said I couldn't find one example of a holocaust denier spreading hate speech. he's deliberately an idiot.

 

[Gandhi]

So you have no evidence, gotcha.

When two names immediately stuck out in the list that had no hate attributed to them there's no point going through the others.

Translation: Give David Duke and Ernst Zündel (a neo naziz who commissioned the work of one of the "names" that stuck out to you, another point you dodged) a pass because it would destroy your argument.

 

[uptheirons!]

Translation: Give David Duke and Ernst Zündel (a neo naziz who commissioned the work of one of the "names" that stuck out to you, another point you dodged) a pass because it would destroy your argument.

When did either of them say they hate jews? Just cause they question the narrative doesn't mean they hate Jews.