Putin makes Holocaust denial a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in jail.

Should we have laws like this in America?


  • Total voters
    208
Status
Not open for further replies.
The evidence for the holocaust is overwhelming and if you're going to challenge it, you better make sure your evidence is above reproach. The people you are talking about are fucktards who knowingly distort information and lie while purposefully riling up violent, deranged elements of society. There are plenty of avenues available to them if they would dedicate themselves to academia, if they would resist from undermining their own work with lies and if they would distance themselves from fucktard violent extremist movements.

And handful of countries have said that they're not going to allow these violent extremist movements peddle their bullshit. There are hundreds of countries around the world that will permit their violent lies.

Please tell me how to unemotionally let you know your ideas are idiotic and you're defending the ability of fucktards to spread hate in a small handful of countries, instead of defending actual academics and journalists.

I'm not joking. Apparently I am missing the mark on letting you know how stupid your ideas are.

Sorry sweetheart, but you're way to emotional for this. Msg me when you're off the rag.
 
Sorry sweetheart, but you're way to emotional for this. Msg me when you're off the rag.

How can I tell you your ideas are absolutely idiotic and you're defending fucktards instead of academics and journalists? I really want to know how I can better communicate with you. Is the problem that I'm using facts?
 
How can I tell you your ideas are absolutely idiotic and you're defending fucktards instead of academics and journalists? I really want to know how I can better communicate with you. Is the problem that I'm using facts?

You're picking and choosing who gets to be called an academic.
 
You're picking and choosing who gets to be called an academic.

No I'm not. People who deal with facts and real historical research are academics. People who have a record of distorting information (and flat-out lying) while repeating information that has been thoroughly debunked are fucktards.

In fact, it is the fucktards making that choice themselves.
 
No I'm not. People who deal with facts and real historical research are academics. People who have a record of distorting information (and flat-out lying) while repeating information that has been thoroughly debunked are fucktards.

In fact, it is the fucktards making that choice themselves.

So emotional LOL. You can't make one post without lobbing insults. It confirms your insecurity.
 
democrats in the united states are very close in ideology to that of liberals in Canada.

In canada, the liberal government has gone full retard and has made it punishable by law to control speech...just as Putin has made it punishable by law to not deny the holocaust.

you asked how these two things relate I just explained it to you.

In case you've had your head up your ass this past year...people have gone full retard since Trump became president. People are getting triggered and upset about everything now, and everyone has been sexual harrassed.

Just watch how full retard the next democratic government becomes in an effort to make everyone currently triggered, feel better. Hell the last libtard government that just expired thought same sex washrooms were ideal.

I can't wait to see how bat shit crazy this next democratic government elected into office becomes. And with that you can enjoy your freedoms eroded away like we are in Canada.
The thread is about a Russian law. That's not the United States. It's also not Canada. Do you not comprehend geography? Or is the idea of a thread topic the problem?
 
The thread is about a Russian law. That's not the United States. It's also not Canada. Do you not comprehend geography? Or is the idea of a thread topic the problem?

You asked how I made the connection as to why Putin is like a libtard.

I answered your fucking question.

Or are you confused still?
 
So emotional LOL. You can't make one post without lobbing insults. It confirms your insecurity.

That can't be what's coming across as emotional. I'm not calling you a fucktard; I'm using that word on people who are universally recognized as fucktards because of their idiot lies and efforts to spread hate. This is a very clinical use of "fucktard".

The more you struggle to explain, the more I suspect that you are the emotional one because you seem to cry about emotions every time I describe the factual reality of these idiots' work.
 
That can't be what's coming across as emotional. I'm not calling you a fucktard; I'm using that word on people who are universally recognized as fucktards because of their idiot lies and efforts to spread hate. This is a very clinical use of "fucktard".

The more you struggle to explain, the more I suspect that you are the emotional one because you seem to cry about emotions every time I write the factual reality of these idiots' work.

Please explain this "hate" you speak of. You haven't presented a single "factual reality", you've just been crying and insulting from your first post.
 
Please explain this "hate" you speak of. You haven't presented a single "factual reality", you've just been crying and insulting from your first post.

You can do it yourself! Knowledge is kind of like an immersive game in that regard. Take the ideas of these fucktards that you're defending (any one, it doesn't matter) and then go look up the truth of the matter. In this way you can learn not only about these people and the idiocy of their ideas, but with enough exposure you will be eventually be able to recognize the difference between an actual academic and a crank on the internet.
 
This thread couldn't even get off page one before the antisemitism and holocaust denial started oozing out of Sherdoggers

Just know people can see you
 
You can do it yourself! Knowledge is kind of like an immersive game in that regard. Take the ideas of these fucktards that you're defending (any one, it doesn't matter) and then go look up the truth of the matter. In this way you can learn not only about these people and the idiocy of their ideas, but with enough exposure you will be eventually be able to recognize the difference between an actual academic and a crank on the internet.

So you can't come up with a single instance of "hate." Gotcha. ;)
 
This thread couldn't even get off page one before the antisemitism and holocaust denial started oozing out of Sherdoggers

Just know people can see you

No one has denied anything and I haven't read a single instance of anti-semitism. This is a question of free speech so don't be so dramatic.
 
No one has denied anything and I haven't read a single instance of anti-semitism. This is a question of free speech so don't be so dramatic.

Antisemitism is very, very real.

Claims that jewish holocaust casualties "doubled" over the last 30 years is textbook holocaust denial playbook

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007272

The figures have always been between 5.1 and 6 million, not even close

To claim exaggeration/doubling in the face of Nuremberg and well-documented records is a targeted bias against the jewish population and a deliberate effort to portray them as falsifying statistics for their own gain. Meanwhile the gaps in recorded death statistics were derived from undocumented executions at the hands of people that didn't see their deaths worth recording. But hey. Blame that grey area on the jews and accuse them of inflating death statistics for their own advantage

Does that sound antisemetic to you
 
Antisemitism is very, very real.

Claims that jewish holocaust casualties "doubled" over the last 30 years is textbook holocaust denial playbook

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007272

The figures have always been between 5.1 and 6 million, not even close

To claim exaggeration/doubling in the face of Nuremberg and well-documented records is a targeted bias against the jewish population and a deliberate effort to portray them as falsifying statistics for their own gain. Meanwhile the gaps in recorded death statistics were derived from undocumented executions at the hands of people that didn't see their deaths worth recording. But hey. Blame that grey area on the jews and accuse them of inflating death statistics for their own gain

Does that sound antisemetic to you

Their have been Jews who came to different conclusions, are they antisemitic as well? A Jew who's parents were survivors wrote a book on how the Holocaust has become a money making industry; is he anti-semitic as well? In Israel the word for Holocaust is Shoah, and they joke that "There's no business like Shoah business." Are they anti-semitic as well?
 
Their have been Jews who came to different conclusions, are they antisemitic as well? A Jew who's parents were survivors wrote a book on how the Holocaust has become a money making industry; is he anti-semitic as well? In Israel the word for Holocaust is Shoah, and they joke that "There's no business like Shoah business." Are they anti-semitic as well?

If you're trying to tell me that jews making legally derived money in any context at any point in history is a sign of deviousness or sinister conspiratorial plotting, you are being antisemetic

Your examples are "look at these jewish families making money after historical targeting. COINCIDENCE?"

By that same extension, drawing comparisons to jews establishing business and family fortune in the wake of exile or targeted history does not draw sinister parallels to the holocaust by virtue of money existing in their family. That is also classic antisemitism playbook
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top