- Joined
- Jan 26, 2017
- Messages
- 22,345
- Reaction score
- 44,684
Wrong. I DO get that. You just can't escape your mind from the capitalism 101 class you took and carved "Supply and demand" into the concrete you call your brain. I'm well aware of that and said it specifically.You are actually the one mistaking the real product here. Which is the ufc.
HAHA, no it doesn't.The UFC makes many stars,
Dana isn't unique. The exact same way that fighters can be replaced, so can he. The machine is running and will continue to run. And the fighters are the wheels on the ground. The UFC doesn't do shit to create stories. What WWE are you watching? You think they put great promotion into their fighters? Or is it just great promotion to be in the UFC. That's why there will always be another fighter, but if you keep pushing this "You should only pay people as little as you can get away with doing" mentality, you're gonna get a rude awakening.there is almost unlimited fighter begging for a shot in the ufc. What is unique is the ufc itself, Dana, their marketing. The fighters aren’t special, the ufc is the one who creates their stories and gets you sucked in
Everyone is and will be replaced. Welcome to capitalism.So I believe we simply disagree. I believe the founders and brains of the ufc are more rare and talented and responsible for its wealth than replaceable fighters
You're a schmuck.Also, I do agree. So keep prelim fighters at 15/15 no one comes to see them. Pay McGregor more though
You think anyone I'm criticizing created the UFC and you're calling me uneducated? All your points are worthless, and only dependent on this money-generation theory you have when they ALREADY HAVE THE MONEY, and don't do shit with it.I think you must be uneducated. Running a business is extremely hard work and just as important and meaningful as the fighting itself.
You think it’s easy to create the ufc or run an event? You and no one you know could do it.
Get to your sophomore year in your business degree and come back.