Promiscuity

[MortalWombat]

i think anyone who thinks a vagina is like a lock doesn't know enough about vaginas or locks to deserve to have his opinion counted on either subject

This thread depresses me, imma end it all, e-suicide time, here it goes

Spoiler

 

[Iroh]

I'm engaged.

People are welcome to try to do her. If they wouldn't take no for an answer, that's when we'd have a problem.

Where do you live and be honest on the general men's scale for women she's hot, right?

 

[Merlotte's]

This thread depresses me, imma end it all, e-suicide time, here it goes

Spoiler

Fuck, I quoted it. Dubbs!

 

[mesomorph]

Where do you live and be honest on the general man's scale for women she's hot, right?

LOL. Like my location says, Finland.
Yeah, she's hot.

But I'm pretty sure she'd turn you (and everyone else) down. Otherwise I wouldn't have gotten engaged in the first place.

Plenty of available hot tail here though, if you insist on taking the flight.

 

[Benoco]

Adultery is defined only as this:

A man having sex with a married woman. It is only in this scenario that it is properly adultery and exceedingly wrong. The blame falls upon both - the wife fucker and the whore wife.

A married man having sex with an unmarried woman is simply fornication.

You have a responsibility to not go after another man's wife. She may be a whore, but she's still his, and you deserve what's coming to you when you do it. Plus, it's to your shame to do it.

Where did you get that idea?

Adultery: voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse , e.g. she was committing adultery with a much younger man.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery

Are you from the Middle East?

 

[fatalis]

i think anyone who thinks a vagina is like a lock doesn't know enough about vaginas or locks to deserve to have his opinion counted on either subject

I don't think anybody that fails to understand a metaphor should have their opinion counted.

 

[fingercuffs]

I'm surprised that Fat Abbot teenager's not been all over this yet.

 

[Cestus]

Male
Happy banana: I'm the first to cheat, i can't judge nobody. My caveman mind approve,the man engaged or free is born to be hunter. Just you're retard if you destroy a marriage+son's life+your $ for new boobs

Selective banana: Are you priest or something? Are you waiting the "right perfect girl"? Even in this case you don't step on the ring without training

Female
Happy vagina: Yay, new toy! Fun girl to have around in group of friends and great material for teh cheating,since she's less likely to get obsessed
I love the fun/smart/nice attitude ones, are perfect girls for everything is'nt "official GF".
Basically no human respect for the annoying/loud/stupid ones, give me holes and after disappear please... these are the perfect groups destroyer,there is ever the retard friend that fall in love with one
Extremely annoyed by the modern screamer that when she's not riding a banana she's endless screaming at everybody to get respect and 2013 politically correctness... princess, i'm a SOB and admit that, take your slut tag and go have fun

Selective vagina: First feature i want in a potential GF. Not the most important, but the must starting point.
Years ago i turned down the chance to be officially with the hottest girl i ever had.
She was really that hot, but great case super happy vagina. Even cube girl :icon_chee
She was great cheat material, but when me and the GF broke she wanted become the new official one because "she was in supa love and if she's in love she's a completely different person"
Short story i refused and find a good one ( my actual GF), she "fall in love" with another dude and told me how perfect holyGFwife she's when "in true love" and how i've been stupid because to don't trust her... 4 months later they broke,because he discovered that she was riding the banana of somebody known on facebook :icon_chee

 

[Yeast**]

No. You are actually the one at fault in that situation, as much as the whore wife.

Nope. Didn't agree to your little monogamous bullshit, completely not my problem.

If you touch another man's woman, you get what's coming to you. If he half's a man, you deserved to get seriously fucked.

His wife already did the serious fucking. And if he's even so much as half a man he wouldn't have married a woman who will cheat in the first place.

 

[SevenSamurai]

I take the lock and key view. This is that a lock that can be opened by a lot of keys is a worthless lock but a key that can open a lot of locks is a god key. .

Cool concept, and I'm sure you are doing your best to make this true, but overall, the math doesn't really work out this way.

If your unlocking that many, they are going to find another on some level once you are gone. I don't think effectiveness at unlocking them can usurp their basic need to have someone once your gone..

basically they are not waiting on Fatalis very long......:icon_sad:

 

[fatalis]

Cool concept, and I'm sure you are doing your best to make this true, but overall, the math doesn't really work out this way.

If your unlocking that many, they are going to find another on some level once you are gone. I don't effectiveness at unlocking them can usurp their basic need to have someone once your gone..

basically they are not waiting on Fatalis very long......:icon_sad:

I just realised that said god key... that was unintentional, thank you for pointing that out.

 

[Madmick]

Adultery is defined only as this:

A man having sex with a married woman. It is only in this scenario that it is properly adultery and exceedingly wrong. The blame falls upon both - the wife fucker and the whore wife.

A married man having sex with an unmarried woman is simply fornication.

You have a responsibility to not go after another man's wife. She may be a whore, but she's still his, and you deserve what's coming to you when you do it. Plus, it's to your shame to do it.

That's appallingly sexist, and you're describing an etymology derived from an ancient Roman virtue, not a modern one. Adultery today describes either married party being unfaithful.

 

[Cestus]

I'm engaged.

People are welcome to try to do her. If they wouldn't take no for an answer, that's when we'd have a problem.

Nah, fuck that... aside her reaction, the fact itself that he's trying on her ignoring you and your relationship with her IS disdain

This don't mean i'm a saint, just that if somebody baseball-bat my front teeth because i've swinged my banana on his GF knowing she "was'nt free"(personally if she's slut i jump in, but i don't try to ruin a nice couple only for get some vagina)... well, i deserved that

It's about the responsability to enjoy fun stuff but at the same time accept risk of your action. Only because today almost nobody make pay shit, don't mean that don't exist a price :icon_chee

 

[Taras Bulba**]

I am not promiscuous by nature and I won't hook up with people of that sort but I have nothing against it when I see it in people.

I only dislike people who use sex as a means to an end which implies not enjoying in it.

I also hate the double standard when it comes to women and men.Women also enjoy having sex, why should the rules differ when it's them and not men in the equation ?

 

[Taras Bulba**]

That's appallingly sexist, and you're describing an etymology derived from an ancient Roman virtue, not a modern one. Adultery today describes either married party being unfaithful.

Good point.One of many fallacies that derive from terminology.

 

[Cestus]

I also hate the double standard when it comes to women and men.Women also enjoy having sex, why should the rules differ when it's them and not men in the equation ?

"Peter Parker remember what his uncle used to say about vagina"

 

[IIIIIIII]

I don't get you blaming the other person. It's between two people, not two people and the entire world. If all she needs to cheat is someone chatting her up then she's not the one.

this is an excellent point.

in a previous thread where the topic of discussion was infidelity, i mentioned how my co-worker was unhappy with her marriage, and one night after work we went to a bar to have a few drinks, and we ended up making out.

that was as far as it ever went, but the reason i bring this up is because i didn't initiate it. yes it's true that we were both drinking, but the feelings were there beforehand.

they don't even sleep in the same room. that is how bad their marriage is.

 

[Taras Bulba**]

"Peter Parker remember what his uncle used to say about vagina"

And what is so powerful about women ?

 

[Cestus]

And what is so powerful about women ?

How is easy for them get teh sex from who they want

The whole thing of wish perfectly identical perception, is made of fail because as start we are'nt perfectly identical

Is something in our (and even in animals) nature, the basic istinct push males to competition and females to chose the best candidate

For rams is who can headbutt harder
For humans in 2013 is one or more qualities

If a man tap 100 women or he ever played easy to pad record with 5/10, or is somebody good at it. Can be good looking, can be rich, have personality, whatever something make him an desirable candidate for women

If a woman get tapped 200 times, can easily be a 5/10 that said "yes" 200 times. Nothing particularly impressive

For this reason a woman tend to appreciate the kind of man that can tap 100 women(not the record itself, but the qualities that make it possible), where a man tend to see the 200tapped woman as a public toilet.

Nobody want something easy to get, because the more is easy get teh win the less is worth the prize
This is how the human tend to think

Women too, just for them the challenge is different
Why hotties that can get everybody they want and have legions of loyal sub-human minions end up with the SOB one?
Because it's more challenge try to tame a wild wolf istead play safe get some fat domestic dog that worship you

 

[Taras Bulba**]

How is easy for them get teh sex from who they want

The whole thing of wish perfectly identical perception, is made of fail because as start we are'nt perfectly identical

Is something in our (and even in animals) nature, the basic istinct push males to competition and females to chose the best candidate

For rams is who can headbutt harder
For humans in 2013 is one or more qualities

If a man tap 100 women or he ever played easy to pad record with 5/10, or is somebody good at it. Can be good looking, can be rich, have personality, whatever something make him an desirable candidate for women

If a woman get tapped 200 times, can easily be a 5/10 that said "yes" 200 times. Nothing particularly impressive

For this reason a woman tend to appreciate the kind of man that can tap 100 women(not the record itself, but the qualities that make it possible), where a man tend to see the 200tapped woman as a public toilet.

Nobody want something easy to get, because the more is easy get teh win the less is worth the prize
This is how the human tend to think

Women too, just for them the challenge is different
Why hotties that can get everybody they want and have legions of loyal sub-human minions end up with the SOB one?
Because it's more challenge try to tame a wild wolf istead play safe get some fat domestic dog that worship you

Sex is a natural thing and it shouldn't be perceived as a prize.Men enjoy it,women enjoy it - they should just do it then.Of course there will be rules because without rules everything falls into chaos.