1. I posted the evidence.
"I'm not calling you a liar, but that doesn't mesh with what I hear him say so I need to see the context."
Read the post you're responding to again.
Sorry, but the rage is coming from you, not me. You keep talking about what I said while never quoting something specific. I wonder why.
My dude, are you going to deny that you're one of the angriest posters here? You keep denying that you said what you said. I wonder why.
So no proofs. No evidence. No quotes. Just you rambling and assuming the worst.
WTF are you talking about? I quoted him. And you didn't take my advice. Also, "rambling." That was a really short post. Did you get hit in the head recently?
Quote what I said in this thread that was an insult and implied you're a liar.
I asked you to quote me. Maybe you're the one who had a concussion falling from your high horse.
I told you to re-read the post. You interpreted a response to Loiosh as a response to you. Also, you used the word "liar" ITT so WTF?
I actually did link another piece on it. There's no "study" necessary here because it's reporting. The basis for the claim about Nixon doing better among radio listeners was one badly conducted, small poll. How does one even go about studying that other than to point out that the claim has no sound basis?
I've asked you more than once to re-read the exchange.
People on the left actually believe that abortion is an important right, and if the outrage after the SC's decision didn't make that clear then nothing will. You are demonstrating that right-wing hacks don't believe that it's possible for people on the left to believe in a real issue.
A lot of people recommend legislation.
I'd recommend opening up to the idea that opinions and genuinely held convictions are more decisive than money, and by a lot too, in crucial contexts. Not believing that has become a signal to me of someone being a hack.
It's not about Heritage bribing Republicans to follow their plan. They come up with the plan with the help of Trump people. Heritage has long worked with the GOP to come up with their agenda. Plus, you profess to believe the dumb bribery theory so it's interesting that you abandon it here (interesting in general how your principles and beliefs change whenever it is convenient for Republican messaging, actually).
Your assessment of abortion being a campaign tool for the left is incorrect. Evidently, there was an appreciated solution in the Roe/Wade decision that was dismantled. The outrage stems thereof, and is genuine.
Bingo.
Why codify something that has already been codified? The idea was that the SC wouldn't arbitrarily dismantle previous decisions, and as long as they're willing to then laws basically don't exist. Good job on giving the Republican judges a pass on being directly evil, though. Blame the Democrats instead, sure.
Respectfully to both of you, this is incorrect. Project 2025 is not about legislation, and it’s not about recommending legislation. People who thinking that it is, have their minds is the completely wrong framework and aren’t understanding what these people are trying to do.
So a bunch of ideas on a website is more influential than ideas backed by millions of dollars?
