Elections Project 2025 major right wing groups plan on creating a new super super pack

This might be difficult for you to understand. But, debates are not meant to be standup comedy events for middle schoolers. It serves as an opportunity for candidates to discuss policy and the pros or cons of such. MAGA morons are so dumb that they think that saying playground insults in a debate in regards to policy is a "win".

Going by the most recent debate it seems like you're wrong ha ha
 
Listen , Trump is a fucking moron through and through. But they are on completley different levels when it comes to cognitive function. That's not to say Trump is young and sharp, moreso that Biden is a walking fossil.

They're better off downplaying it than comparing him to Trump, because there's no comparison there. Trump sounds like a shit talking liar who is still somewhat sharp, Biden looks like he belongs in an elderly care facility.
 
They're better off downplaying it than comparing him to Trump
They can't help themselves. They are incapable of just taking an L and pivoting. They have to make everything about Trump. Joe is mumbling mush brain? Trump must be a worse mumbling mush brain. Reality be damned.

This whole thing is due to them being stupid enough to think that Biden would talk circles around Trump, because they are that delusional in their zealotry. They knew deep down that Biden's brain is FUBAR. Still put him up there.

Beyond the Presidency, that should scare people at how inept and arrogant the Dems are.
 
This might be difficult for you to understand. But, debates are not meant to be standup comedy events for middle schoolers. It serves as an opportunity for candidates to discuss policy and the pros or cons of such. MAGA morons are so dumb that they think that saying playground insults in a debate in regards to policy is a "win".

As someone with a political science degree I assure you this is a current norm. A stupid norm but a norm. The whole "WhAt CanDIdate WOuld You RAther HavE a BeeR wITh" school of thought did not start with MAGA.
 
This might be difficult for you to understand. But, debates are not meant to be standup comedy events for middle schoolers. It serves as an opportunity for candidates to discuss policy and the pros or cons of such. MAGA morons are so dumb that they think that saying playground insults in a debate in regards to policy is a "win".

Do you really think policy discussion is the most significant aspect of a presidential debate? I would say no. I think the most significant factor in a presidential debate is the same now as it was in the very first televised presidential debate, optics.

Meaningful policy discussion is way too complex to be done in the time and format of these debates. If it was about policy discussion they would need to do an extensive series of single topic debates.

The possibly fatal mistake the Biden campaign made with that debate was self inflicted by their own rules. Creating the distinct speaking times by shutting off Trumps mic during Biden's time prevented Trump from looking like the asshole he did in the previous debates, constantly interrupting, not allowing Biden to speak that gave a clear impression that he is obnoxious, incapable of listening to any opposing view, and impossible to reason with. Trump not being able to constantly interrupt and not let Biden finish a sentence this time made it clear that Biden can't actually finish a sentence.
 
As someone with a political science degree I assure you this is a current norm. A stupid norm but a norm. The whole "WhAt CanDIdate WOuld You RAther HavE a BeeR wITh" school of thought did not start with MAGA.
Look at how the debates changed since MAGA. Night and Day difference between Mitt's debates and Trump's. You are delusional if you think otherwise.
 
Do you really think policy discussion is the most significant aspect of a presidential debate? I would say no. I think the most significant factor in a presidential debate is the same now as it was in the very first televised presidential debate, optics.
Just watch Mitt vs. Obama and tell me if you notice a difference from Trump vs. Hilary or Biden
 
They can't help themselves. They are incapable of just taking an L and pivoting. They have to make everything about Trump. Joe is mumbling mush brain? Trump must be a worse mumbling mush brain. Reality be damned.
It is almost like the democrats are constantly having discourse over replacing him and there are several democrats that have opened up by saying that he should be replaced.


The Right has stood by Trump before this whole debacle unfolded even after the rape and felonies were dropped on his head. He was already impeached twice and busted for threatening people to reverse the election results. But instead of choosing and backing a republican that could keep his dick in his pants or avoid salivating over his daughter. They stuck with Trump. It should scare people how dangerously stupid and morally bankrupt that republicans are. They even got maple syrup drinking dotards like you riding for them on the bleachers.
 
Just watch Mitt vs. Obama and tell me if you notice a difference from Trump vs. Hilary or Biden

Why don't you offer how you think that Romney vs Obama debate supports your point because I would say it perfectly illustrates my point that presidential debates have very little to do with policy and Obama himself agrees.
 
Just watch Mitt vs. Obama and tell me if you notice a difference from Trump vs. Hilary or Biden
This is annoying; what are you getting at? Why say Mitt vs. Obama instead of Mitt vs. Barack or Romney vs. Obama. What's your intent? Similarly, Trump vs. Hilary or Biden, instead of Donald vs Hilary or Joe or Trump vs. Clinton or Biden?

Captain Pedantic very much wants you to explain.
 
This might be difficult for you to understand. But, debates are not meant to be standup comedy events for middle schoolers. It serves as an opportunity for candidates to discuss policy and the pros or cons of such. MAGA morons are so dumb that they think that saying playground insults in a debate in regards to policy is a "win".
In theory. Look at the Nixon-Kennedy debate. Debates are almost the equivalent of pageant shows.

I know they have a short term impact on polls, but I'd like to know if they have a lasting impact. I wonder if there are studies on the subject.
 
I just saw that on page 817 of project 2025 owner’s manual, that if trump is elected, he is going to make it illegal to mix any combination of ketchup, mustard, and/or relish on a hotdog.

Only one condiment per hotdog. Or you go to Gitmo, bye bye.
 
It is clear that tweets are the longest text that you read. The point that I made went over your head. I really hope you are just a silly kid and not an adult.
You ignored what he posted though.
 
It is almost like the democrats are constantly having discourse over replacing him and there are several democrats that have opened up by saying that he should be replaced.


The Right has stood by Trump before this whole debacle unfolded even after the rape and felonies were dropped on his head. He was already impeached twice and busted for threatening people to reverse the election results. But instead of choosing and backing a republican that could keep his dick in his pants or avoid salivating over his daughter. They stuck with Trump. It should scare people how dangerously stupid and morally bankrupt that republicans are. They even got maple syrup drinking dotards like you riding for them on the bleachers.

Both sides are messed up. We have shadow people running our country at the moment and the vice president is one of the worst DEI hires in the history of DEI hires. There weren't many less qualified and less deserving politicians for the job than her. Hiring based on immutable characteristics is morally bankrupt as well.

Weird thing is that I know a lot of conservatives and not many of them want to vote for Trump, but they will in order to ensure the Democrats don't stay in office. If we had a better pool of candidates on both sides, we wouldn't be in this mess.
 
Back
Top