Prime Lennox vs Prime Tyson

We've never seen a prime Tyson

He made hundreds of millions in his early 20's

If he kept improving, as typically happens, we might have seen the best HW ever.

What is considered his "prime" is still like a fraction of how good he could've been.

But I guess that's part of the mystique that is Tyson as well.
He wouldn’t have improved.

Kevin Rooney said Mike was a finished product by the time he turned pro. And while his first pro year showed some mental immaturity, his technique was already polished and saw no improvement from 1985-1988.

If anything, he would have gotten worse as time goes on since the peek-a-boo relies heavily on speed and explosiveness and therefore youth.
 
He was only up on 3 shady judges cards …. Douglas was clearly winning
Tyson was up on the cards? And of course Douglas won just about every round.
 
He wouldn’t have improved.

Kevin Rooney said Mike was a finished product by the time he turned pro. And while his first pro year showed some mental immaturity, his technique was already polished and saw no improvement from 1985-1988.

If anything, he would have gotten worse as time goes on since the peek-a-boo relies heavily on speed and explosiveness and therefore youth.
If Kevin said that he was wrong. tyson had lots of things he could have improved on, things he would have needed to improve on to be a great fighter, he just didn't. I remember during the Pinklon Thomas fight, Kevin had him jabbing with Pink and after a couple rounds told him to just go for the kayo, they were still trying to get him to grow in those years, as soon as King and Givens moved in that pretty much ended.
 
If Kevin said that he was wrong. tyson had lots of things he could have improved on, things he would have needed to improve on to be a great fighter, he just didn't. I remember during the Pinklon Thomas fight, Kevin had him jabbing with Pink and after a couple rounds told him to just go for the kayo, they were still trying to get him to grow in those years, as soon as King and Givens moved in that pretty much ended.
Just because he had flaws like everybody else doesn't mean he could have fixed those flaws. Tyson didn't improve one bit from 1985-1988 at an age where he should have improved the most but he would have magically improved later on because?
 
Just because he had flaws like everybody else doesn't mean he could have fixed those flaws. Tyson didn't improve one bit from 1985-1988 at an age where he should have improved the most but he would have magically improved later on because?
why? Because he was so young, heavyweights typically reach maturity at 27-28. The Ali that beat Liston wasn't fully matured either, as great as his performance was. The Duran who won the lightweight title wasn't as good as the duran of five years later. Tyson had such abundant gifts that he could have fought in different ways, he did a bit of using the in and out and angles and jabbing, but he finally just settled on being a midrange fighter, which became too easy to predict and counter for bigger men. It's academic because he didn't, but I'll always think he could have.
 
He wouldn’t have improved.

Kevin Rooney said Mike was a finished product by the time he turned pro. And while his first pro year showed some mental immaturity, his technique was already polished and saw no improvement from 1985-1988.

If anything, he would have gotten worse as time goes on since the peek-a-boo relies heavily on speed and explosiveness and therefore youth.
I refuse to believe that a 20 year old fighter would not continue to improve.

Although, TBF, that version of Tyson admittedly was pretty close to flawless for his style.

But there's always something that can be done.
 
why? Because he was so young, heavyweights typically reach maturity at 27-28. The Ali that beat Liston wasn't fully matured either, as great as his performance was. The Duran who won the lightweight title wasn't as good as the duran of five years later. Tyson had such abundant gifts that he could have fought in different ways, he did a bit of using the in and out and angles and jabbing, but he finally just settled on being a midrange fighter, which became too easy to predict and counter for bigger men. It's academic because he didn't, but I'll always think he could have.
Most boxers don’t have a style that’s absurdly damaging for their lower backs and requires every single movement to be explosive.
 
Most boxers don’t have a style that’s absurdly damaging for their lower backs and requires every single movement to be explosive.
no one from that time in his life says he had back problems, they say he lost his skills and regressed.
 
no one from that time in his life says he had back problems, they say he lost his skills and regressed.
He would most likely have back problems had he kept boxing from 1991-1994 instead of resting in prison, considering how taxing on the lower back his style is.

Also, you completely ignored my point about the peek-a-boo requiring peak athleticism and therefore being most suitable for fighters in their early 20s.
 
He would most likely have back problems had he kept boxing from 1991-1994 instead of resting in prison, considering how taxing on the lower back his style is.

Also, you completely ignored my point about the peek-a-boo requiring peak athleticism and therefore being most suitable for fighters in their early 20s.
long story short, Mike did become someone in pursuit of the big kayo instead of using a lot of skills, that's a huge factor in what caused him to fall apart. In the prime years, he was willing to outpoint and grind guys down. After that, the only fight I can think of where he really worked was the second Ruddock fight, which was a tough fight and one of his better wins.

After prison, he had so many bad habits technically that there was no way he stood a chance against Evander, definitely not the same guy who turned pro or won the title but still a big puncher.
 
Prime Iron Mike was ungodly but unfortunately made his name sparking noodles in the worst era in HW history. As soon as he fought legit comp he was losing.

Id take Lewis to be able to stop any onslaught from a young Mike.
 
long story short, Mike did become someone in pursuit of the big kayo instead of using a lot of skills, that's a huge factor in what caused him to fall apart. In the prime years, he was willing to outpoint and grind guys down. After that, the only fight I can think of where he really worked was the second Ruddock fight, which was a tough fight and one of his better wins.

After prison, he had so many bad habits technically that there was no way he stood a chance against Evander, definitely not the same guy who turned pro or won the title but still a big puncher.
I’m explaining to you why the peek-a-boo is a young man’s style and you’re giving me Tyson’s biography like it’s even relevant.
 
I’m explaining to you why the peek-a-boo is a young man’s style and you’re giving me Tyson’s biography like it’s even relevant.
Because that may not be true, maybe it is. I've never thought about it. I know the style has always been controversial and it does have some problems. Patterson eventually strayed from it too, for what it's worth, he seemed to not get knocked down as much using a more orthodox style. As far as it being taxing, I don't know. Tyson was short, there would be only so many ways he could evade punches.
 
I'm of the opinion that a prime non-partying Tyson, could destroy anybody on Earth in a boxing match.
That’s the difficulty in really evaluating the true legacy of Mike Tyson. I was a huge fan of him myself when I was a kid. But when you evaluate his career, it’s hard to know who he really would beat when it comes to these all-time legends in his so-called prime? He only was really locked in on boxing, training, the desire to be the best for a few years. By 1990 between his marriage, the changes in his training, and his partying he had lost his way already and he was in only his early 20s. Now, if he hadn’t gone to prison, gotten back to his old training habits, and gotten rid of Don King, who knows? He would’ve needed to do all those things after the Buster Douglas fight.
 
That’s the difficulty in really evaluating the true legacy of Mike Tyson. I was a huge fan of him myself when I was a kid. But when you evaluate his career, it’s hard to know who he really would beat when it comes to these all-time legends in his so-called prime? He only was really locked in on boxing, training, the desire to be the best for a few years. By 1990 between his marriage, the changes in his training, and his partying he had lost his way already and he was in only his early 20s. Now, if he hadn’t gone to prison, gotten back to his old training habits, and gotten rid of Don King, who knows? He would’ve needed to do all those things after the Buster Douglas fight.
his size would always be a problem, he had to work so hard just to get into a place to punch that he was bound to burn out.
 
his size would always be a problem, he had to work so hard just to get into a place to punch that he was bound to burn out.
There weren’t a lot of huge heavyweights during the very peak of his career. So I don’t know if it would’ve been a huge problem for him until maybe he got into his late 20s? I mean he had Lennox Lewis and he had Riddick Bowe, at the very peak of his career maybe fighting those guys in the early 90s I think Tyson could’ve won those fights but who the hell Knows?
 
I remember when they fought in 2002 there was all this talk that Lewis would get the better of Tyson in sparring in the mid 1980s. Was there ever any substance to those rumours? I don’t remember anymore the back story to how and why they were sparring together.
 
i think lennox wins more often than not, largely because tyson was a bit inconsistent even at his absolute best. lennox also just matches up well with tyson, great legs, great timing, huge punch repertoire. make no mistake though, if rahman & mccall can catch lewis making a big mistake as far as footwork, tyson can too.

lennox was also almost surely in his prime in the early 90's not the late 90's. post-KO losses lewis was a lot smarter, but the athleticism and talent of younger lennox was scary.
Yes. Remember that Razor Ruddock supposedly gave Tyson some of his best fights, and what a young Lewis did to him.

Also remember that Riddick Bowe threw his belt in the trash rather than face Lewis, and Tyson paid Lewis step-aside-and-wait money when Lewis was the mandatory challenger, so Tyson could get a second belt, so he could give up his WBC title rather than face Lewis.

That tells you what Tyson thought about his chances.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,725
Messages
58,456,166
Members
176,040
Latest member
jaybuff
Back
Top