POTWR 2019 Vol 11: Can We All Test For Ourselves That The Earth Is Round?

[abiG]

Dallas to Beijing:
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/aa263#20b79aea
LMAO!

Wait, it makes sense here again:

 

[MikeMcMann]

How is it impossible to fly form NY to Hawaii to Tokyo on a flat earth?

And why do all the direct flights take the shortest path on the Gleason map, but not on a globe?

I said it was impossible to leave NYC and fly both EAST and WEST thru Dubai and thru Hawaii respectively and yet end up in the same place, Japan.

Unless you want to vacation at the stopover, why bother?

i explained the stop over. You cannot deny direction and claim some bullshit circumnavigating. If the plane has to touch down in each of those locations (Hawaii and Dubai) before continuing you establish each flight flying hours in the opposite direction from New York. It is then impossible to get them both to Japan without having one double back.

 

[MikeMcMann]

And stop being so silly. Go to Expedia and build your own multi stop flight to make it easy. NYC to Dubai, Dubai to Japan. NYC to Hawaii and Hawaii to Japan. And then look where both Hawaii and Dubai are in relation to NYC and then look where both are in relation to Japan.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Dallas to Beijing:
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/aa263#20b79aea
LMAO!

Wait, it makes sense here again:

Why's the map all distorted?

 

[abiG]

And stop being so silly. Go to Expedia and build your own multi stop flight to make it easy. NYC to Dubai, Dubai to Japan. NYC to Hawaii and Hawaii to Japan. And then look where both Hawaii and Dubai are in relation to NYC and then look where both are in relation to Japan.

I know that can be done? What are you thinking you are proving?

Look at the Gleason map. It can be done there as well, no? And again, why would anyone do that? There are many flights listed, even nonstop that are cheaper.

 

[abiG]

Why's the map all distorted?

LOL... how do you know it is?

 

[abiG]

I said it was impossible to leave NYC and fly both EAST and WEST thru Dubai and thru Hawaii respectively and yet end up in the same place, Japan.

IT IS NOT!

i explained the stop over. You cannot deny direction and claim some bullshit circumnavigating. If the plane has to touch down in each of those locations (Hawaii and Dubai) before continuing you establish each flight flying hours in the opposite direction from New York. It is then impossible to get them both to Japan without having one double back.

I have no clue what you think you are saying here. I'm being serious.

You really need to rethink everything you have typed on this thread.

 

[MikeMcMann]

I know that can be done? What are you thinking you are proving?

Look at the Gleason map. It can be done there as well, no? And again, why would anyone do that? There are many flights listed, even nonstop that are cheaper.

Just say you give up.

This is not about cost. This is about direction. And when establishing direction you use markers. If I say the flight is leaving NYC and flying east to Japan and leaving NYC and flying West to Japan and both flights are non stop you will put up nonsense about some type of circumnavigating. By putting in markers you can PLOT on your flat earth model you see its impossible to have 2 different flights depart NYC for Japan. One flying West and touching down in Hawaii and the other flying East and touching down in Dubai and yet both end up in Japan.

Plot the points on your flat earth and try to draw a line showing the flight path and you will quickly see how badly you fail. You cannot win. This remains the one easy explanation you cannot get over.

 

[MikeMcMann]

IT IS NOT!


I have no clue what you think you are saying here. I'm being serious.

You really need to rethink everything you have typed on this thread.

Draw it on your map then.

Show NYC.

Then join it with a flight line to Hawaii and then on to Japan.

Then also join it with a line to Dubai and then Japan.

You won't be able to to. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE on your flat earth to make that work. But go ahead and try. Its good for the lulz as many flat earthers before you have tried and failed.

 

[abiG]

Just say you give up.

This is not about cost. This is about direction. And when establishing direction you use markers. If I say the flight is leaving NYC and flying east to Japan and leaving NYC and flying West to Japan and both flights are non stop you will put up nonsense about some type of circumnavigating. By putting in markers you can PLOT on your flat earth model you see its impossible to have 2 different flights depart NYC for Japan. One flying West and touching down in Hawaii and the other flying East and touching down in Dubai and yet both end up in Japan.

Plot the points on your flat earth and try to draw a line showing the flight path and you will quickly see how badly you fail. You cannot win. This remains the one easy explanation you cannot get over.

But as explained, those flights are not listed. This is why I have used actual flights that occur in the real world and not custom, two-way, user designed trips.

Look at every single damn flight path that I took the time to post for you. They are all similar and work perfectly on the Gleason map.

And sorry, but if you can't figure out how a custom designed trip would work on the Gleason map, I won't be able to explain it.

@Cubo de Sangre... little help? Do you know what he is saying?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

LOL... how do you know it is?

New Zealand looks bigger than Japan when it's land area is listed as 264 sq. km vs. Japan's 364.

http://world.bymap.org/LandArea.html

 

[abiG]

New Zealand looks bigger than Japan when it's land area is listed as 264 sq. km vs. Japan's 364.

http://world.bymap.org/LandArea.html

Ah, I see, look at the maps that you are used to seeing and tell me the land masses are the correct size.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

@Cubo de Sangre... little help? Do you know what he is saying?

Gotta be honest, the more he posts the less sense it's made. Maybe he's not looking at your distorted map.

 

[abiG]

Gotta be honest, the more he posts the less sense it's made. Maybe he's not looking at your distorted map.

Greenland... lol!

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Ah, I see, look at the maps that you are used to seeing and tell me the land masses are the correct size.

To my knowledge they're not, and that's because the map is making something that's round flat. Whereas if the Earth is flat, the map shouldn't produce any distortion.

 

[abiG]

To my knowledge they're not, and that's because the map is making something that's round flat. Whereas if the Earth is flat, the map shouldn't produce any distortion.

To my knowledge, there is no agreed upon "flat-earth" map, but they're all kind of like the above.

Did you click the flight path links I posted?

A little weird at least?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

@abiG, On the standard flat Earth map, which cities are the furthest distance apart (as the crow flies)? What is that distance?

 

[abiG]

@abiG, On the standard flat Earth map, which cities are the furthest distance apart (as the crow flies)? What is that distance?

The flight path we could not find would probably be one of them.

But what about the ones we could find? C'mon, you can say it.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

To my knowledge, there is no agreed upon "flat-earth" map, but they're all kind of like the above.

 

[abiG]

C'mon, you weren't the least bit taken aback by those flight paths to Asia?