- Joined
- Jul 20, 2024
- Messages
- 2,706
- Reaction score
- 6,328
Ban it all
Don't listen to these reddit tier degenerates!
Don't listen to these reddit tier degenerates!
Uh no. I pointed out that in YOUR post you spent half of it saying that drugs were bad because of the criminal aspect of it. I responded to that. Learn to read.i was talking about hard drugs. The abuse of prescription painkillers is for sure a huge problem a doctor prescribing them willy nilly is no different than a drug dealer. The issue was the idea that it's a victimless crime which it is not. Decriminalization has not worked, Safe injections sites and hard reductions have only resulted in a vast increase in deaths, continued usage and overall suffering. It is not harm reduction whatsoever, It just passes it from the addict to the surrounding community while facilitating the act to occur at a much higher level before. You give an addict free reign to do drugs, they aren't going to work where are they going to get the money from ? Welfare is only enough to cover your fix for a short time. You are then forcing people to commit crimes and further victimize people in order to fund an addiction that you helped enable.
War on drugs didn't work yes, but giving up having a free for all is not the answer. You just punishing everyone else because you can't deal with the problem
The only thing you responded to is government making it illegal, which is not what I said. I said it is not a victimless crime. Learn to read.
Was there a massive rape epidemic before porn was widely available to quench everyone's thirst ? No your theory is stupid. How many serial killers have stated that the reason why they went down the path they did was because of pornography ? That is very well documented.
No, but I would be for a ban on asking me stupid questions.
asking someone to define what graphic sex is, a simple phrase that defines itself is the exact same bullshit game as asking someone to explain the difference between a natural vagina and one constructed from surgery.Buddy this isn’t pulling any crap. You are proposing a ban on something, I’m asking you to define that thing you want to ban. I’m even being kind and respectful.
you can't read or comprehend what you said never mind what I said that is very strangeUh no. I pointed out that in YOUR post you spent half of it saying that drugs were bad because of the criminal aspect of it. I responded to that. Learn to read.
It certainly doesn’t in the context of pornography. When I asked, “so as long as you don’t film penetration, you’re good?” Bc by your definition that would be ok.asking someone to define what graphic sex is, a simple phrase that defines itself
Keeping porn away from kids is sharia? You can look at all the porn you want if you're 18.Welcome to Christian Sharia, enjoy youCanucks?
Sigh...must we always use qualifiers in discussions?
They now want some personal information to prove age. Call it whatever helps you understand, but this didnt happen before and it's a slippery slope.
that sounds pretty graphically sexual to me. Tell you what since you seem to be an expert in the field, when I get elected I will make you the official graphic sex czarIt certainly doesn’t in the context of pornography. When I asked, “so as long as you don’t film penetration, you’re good?” Bc by your definition that would be ok.
I could film a hot and heavy scene with some chesty tattooed lady riding me like the dime store cowboy I am, spitting in my mouth and pulling my hair and that would be ok so long as the actual act of insertion wasn’t on the screen and she still had her bikini top on.
That isn’t graphic sex but is more pornographic than filming someone doing boring, no passion missionary from across the room.
What if we kept our clothes on? If so, how much clothing is required?that sounds pretty graphically sexual to me. Tell you what since you seem to be an expert in the field, when I get elected I will make you the official graphic sex czar
Ah, the ol' "I can't define it but I know it when I see it" LOLasking someone to define what graphic sex is, a simple phrase that defines itself is the exact same bullshit game as asking someone to explain the difference between a natural vagina and one constructed from surgery.
you can't read or comprehend what you said never mind what I said that is very strange
Exactly. Can I still sit on cake for money on my webcam while pay pigs release the doves at home?Ah, the ol' "I can't define it but I know it when I see it" LOL
Shrooms and weed are completely harmless those are the facts buddy. Both are used to great effect in therapeutic treatments. Nobody is using fentanyl to treat PTSD. Nobody dies or gets addicted to either substance. Nobody gets pimped trafficked abused diseased and psychologically damaged in the production of either substance. I am not making an exception for them they shouldn't even be in the same category in the first place only a complete fool would put them in the same box.
Holy shit. What a reasonable response...I travel a lot so I’ve already seen it outright banned in some countries. I had to resort to the same workaround. It’s an extra inconvenience but it’s the easiest way for now.
Also not sure how a simple question got devolved into a heated debate on other things, instead of actually providing helpful answers. Your consumption habit on the said product/service is nobody’s business.
We all take shits, but I still close the door.So you're afraid someone will find out that you're looking at porn?
To me, porn is something I'd have and not need rather than need it and not have it.
Understanding is hard!
Calling pornography a need is wild.
Understanding is hard!
Well..sure, but I'm not an addict.It's all about moderation, but it's easier said than done. And almost anything can be abused, so I believe in regulation of some kind. You got too many young impressionable/vulnerable minds out there that can easily get adverse effect from porn.
And in fact it has affected a lot of young people (and older) and made them antisocial people.