- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 33,892
- Reaction score
- 54,781
You are lying.You said that he had made heretical statements. Then I explained to you that all of that has been explained by other theologians. Then I asked you to list them and you ghosted and then after that you repeated those lies again to someone else. So now you should either show your receipts or quit lying about the Pope.
You are being influenced by right wing propaganda.
But it’s okay, here are the things in question:
- 1. Amoris Laetitia and Communion for Divorced and Remarried Catholics
- Issue: The 2016 apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (Chapter 8, footnote 351) allows, in some cases, divorced and civilly remarried Catholics in “irregular” unions to receive Communion after discernment, without requiring them to live in continence.
- Critics’ Claim: This contradicts Catholic doctrine on the indissolubility of marriage and the Eucharist, as taught in Familiaris Consortio (1981), which requires abstinence from sexual relations for such couples to receive Communion. Critics argue it implies adultery can be morally acceptable, denying divine law.
- Heresy Accusation: The 2019 open letter and 2017 Filial Correction label this a rejection of Catholic teaching on marriage, sexual morality, and sacramental discipline, constituting heresy. The dubia by four cardinals (2016) and ongoing global divisions in implementation amplify the charge.
- Impact: Its formal nature (a papal document) and direct challenge to core doctrines make it the most cited evidence of potential “heresy”.
- 2. Religious Pluralism and Statements on Other Religions
- Issue: Statements like the 2019 Abu Dhabi document (“The pluralism and diversity of religions… are willed by God in His wisdom”) and the 2024 Singapore interfaith remark (“All religions are paths to reach God”) are seen as endorsing religious pluralism.
- Critics’ Claim: These suggest God positively wills non-Christian religions, including polytheistic ones, as valid paths to salvation, contradicting the doctrine that salvation comes solely through Christ and the Church (extra Ecclesiam nulla salus).
- Heresy Accusation: The 2019 open letter accuses Francis of denying Christ’s unique salvific role, a heretical position. Critics call the Singapore statement a “rejection of Christ,” implying relativism or syncretism.
- Impact: These statements, made in high-profile interfaith settings, fuel accusations of heresy due to their public nature and perceived theological ambiguity, though they are less concrete than Amoris Laetitia.
- 3. Moral Theology and Subjective Culpability
- Issue: Amoris Laetitia and related teachings emphasize subjective factors (e.g., conscience, circumstances) in moral culpability, suggesting individuals can knowingly violate divine law (e.g., in irregular unions) without committing mortal sin.
- Critics’ Claim: This undermines the objective nature of sin and the Church’s moral teachings, as it implies divine commandments can be set aside based on personal discernment. The 2019 open letter cites this as a denial of the Church’s doctrine on grave sin.
- Heresy Accusation: Critics argue Francis’s focus on subjective conscience over objective moral norms constitutes a heretical rejection of divine law’s binding nature, tied to Amoris Laetitia’s pastoral approach.
- Impact: This issue is significant for its theological implications but is often subsumed under Amoris Laetitia critiques, making it less standalone than the other two, though still central to scholarly accusations like the Filial Correction.
These are issues that cardinals in the Catholic Church have brought up. I didn’t call him a heretic outright.
I like you man, but you’re going off the deep end here.