Social Peter Strzok back to the FBI

[glenwo2]

LOL posting a blog called "TruePundit" by a guy named "Thomas Paine"
God the critical thinking here is so sad.

So are you saying it didn't happen?

'Cause the whole point of the OP is that it happened.

Mock the "author" all you want but I was merely putting it up because apparently this horseshit occurred.

 

[glenwo2]

Maybe it’s a relative thing?

I don't think @JamesRussler has any relatives that look and sound like Ben Shapiro....

...right?


RIGHT?

 

[glenwo2]

Trump's own pick was surely part of the whole thing. Of course any sign of independence will not be tolerated, so those that show any integrity at all must be replaced with loyalists, unqualified as they may be. Same with Comey not being charged for leaking right? It's all a deep state conspiracy.

"INTEGRITY"

<=== The "U for real, brah?" look

 

[glenwo2]

Absolutely nauseating human being he is.

Some nauseating posters and posts here, too, Tropodan.

 

[glenwo2]

not gonna lie, put me in the would hit category with page. you know he liberated her posterior

With what? A Dildo to compensate for his 1-inch pecker?

 

[glenwo2]

This guy didn't do anything worth losing his job over. He was improper. He wasn't criminal. He wasn't grossly unethical. He's a good agent.

okay.....I just put up a post with the word "dildo" in it before I saw your post and noticed your name.

WHAT IN THE HELL?

Did you lose a bet or something?

 

[glenwo2]

Don't believe the hype. Same for Comey. What he described in his memos is exactly in line with Trump's character and actions to this point. And to think he did almost as much as the Russians to help get Trump elected.

Russians did not manipulate the final tally of votes (both electoral and popular) to make Trump win. <Lmaoo>

Come on now....let's stop this lunacy-type of thinking here. It's 2019, not 2016. Enough of the whining.

 

[glenwo2]

Donald Trump

Hmmm...

Okay...you may have a point there despite me being a Trump-supporter.

He was never the most friendly person pre-presidency so I can see it.

So let's see the tally thus far :

Trump
Shapiro
Strzok

You could put that in any order actually.


I would add :

Schumer
Nadler
McConnell
Schiff

 

[glenwo2]

It might just be filling others in on investigations that he was part of, but if the article is correct - then other agents find it unusual.

And its bad form to attack the articles author instead of the content.[/QUOTE]

THANK YOU.

Doing that is basically akin to sticking your head in the sand and ignoring everything else.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

"INTEGRITY"

<=== The "U for real, brah?" look

I already stated he should be fired. How about Wray?

 

[JamesRussler]

The investigation was clearly warranted.

I respect your opinion, I respect you as a poster, and I respectfully disagree.

 

[brackis1]

So are you saying it didn't happen?

'Cause the whole point of the OP is that it happened.

Mock the "author" all you want but I was merely putting it up because apparently this horseshit occurred.

Dude how mentally challenged are you?
The name "Thomas Paine" is a fake name made by some blogger.
Do you understand the difference between a blog where someone uses the name of a revolutionary war figure, and say....a real publication with journalists who work everyday on professional reporting?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Russians did not manipulate the final tally of votes (both electoral and popular) to make Trump win. <Lmaoo>

Come on now....let's stop this lunacy-type of thinking here. It's 2019, not 2016. Enough of the whining.

There was Russian interference. Read the Mueller report.

 

[JamesRussler]

I don't think @JamesRussler has any relatives that look and sound like Ben Shapiro....

...right?


RIGHT?

Hale naw

 

[Deleted member 539235]

holy shit glen learn to multi-quote

 

[Madmick]

Trump has a right to appoint anyone qualified for the position that can get confirmed but there's a separation of powers. The DoJ and FBI should act independently not at the whim of The President. I'm sure there are some bad apples in all branches of government but gutting our agencies to appoint loyalists every time there's a new President is certain to hurt our national security. Not to mention how much this witch hunt is just a way for Trump to blame others for his own failure to run a clean campaign.

You mean you want the FBI to be like the CIA?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

You mean you want the FBI to be like the CIA?

No. I don't want the President to be able to squelch investigations against him or direct investigations against his opponents.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

Some nauseating posters and posts here, too, Tropodan.

Yep.

Howd ya get the dubs?

 

[PainIsLIfe]

The just isn't even close to true.

The Mueller investigation turned up many crimes, some of which are still being investigated, and plenty of his henchmen felt the law including his long time personal lawyer and his campaign manager. He uncovered clear attempts by the Russian state to infiltrate our networks, steal information and spread disinformation during our campaign cycle. Just because they didn't find Trump snapchatting Putin, doesn't mean no crimes were found and nothing of value was gained. It's pretty clear Trump himself is guilty of campaign finance violations and obstruction of justice there just isn't the political willpower to do anything about it.

That's pretty accurate as well, but no one (TMK) has ever been found guilty of such a campaign finance volation that didn't plead guilty.

I'd add that Russia spread a lot of accurate information as well - democrats just dont like who that info was about.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

That's pretty accurate as well, but no one (TMK) has ever been found guilty of such a campaign finance volation that didn't plead guilty.

I'd add that Russia spread a lot of accurate information as well - democrats just dont like who that info was about.

It doesn't seem rational to me either. He was caught red handed but won't admit he directed the payments. Maybe it's just his nature to deny everything to the end. That and all the lies claiming false credit and attacking every opponent are the main reasons I don't think he's a credible President.

The true things, that weren't hacked, would have been reported on anyway for the electorate to consider when they voted. Even the hacked stuff you might say was worth knowing if it wasn't from only one side. If they had released Trump's tax returns and disclosed the TT meeting and attempts at a TT Moscow then we could disregard their interference more as a public service. The way things occurred though shows that they wanted to attack Hillary while having influence on Trump once he was elected.

And if you consider Trump's actions since then he was either a willing participant or someone who is afraid Russia will disclose all the information they do have on him. Right now they can make any claim as to the subject of their private meeting and Trump is such a liar nobody will believe any counter argument he would make.