Social Peter Strzok back to the FBI

glenwo2 said:
Un-fucking-believable!!! <{cruzshake}>

Wray Welcomes Peter Strzok Back to FBI


Almost one year after he was fired from his top post at FBI, Peter Strzok is back in the building and the FBI’s good graces.

“Strzok is in the (HQ) building all the time,” one FBI insider revealed. “He is taking meetings or part of meetings.”


What?

FBI sources confirm Strzok has been granted access to FBI facilities in Washington, D.C. and its headquarters building on numerous occasions since he was sacked in August 2018.

Strzok has also not been stripped of his security clearances, an FBI insider said.

“He (Strzok) is getting in with a visitor’s badge and is involved in meetings,” one FBI insider said. “Maybe they are all trying to get their story straight before things go public.”

Such “things” include declassification of the FISA warrant the FBI used to spy on the campaign of Donald Trump. One of the warrants is scheduled to be declassified and released this summer, however FBI Director Christopher Wray is trying to delay its release, sources said.


At all costs.

While Americans were under the impression that Strzok was a disavowed FBI insider, that is not the case. Even top FBI officials are wondering how and why Strzok has been allowed to come back into FBI headquarters.

Likewise, FBI sources said when Strzok is not at the Hoover building he has been holding meetings with high-level DOJ brass at a location across the street from the Buerau’s Pennsylvania Avenue base.


But why? Wray is not saying.

The FBI fired Strzok, who helped lead the bureau’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election until officials discovered that he had been sending anti-Trump texts.

The termination was a remarkable downfall for Strzok, a 22-year member of the bureau who investigated Russian spies, defense officials accused of selling secrets to China and myriad other important cases. In the twilight of his career, Strzok was integral to two of the bureau’s most high-profile investigations: the Russia case and the inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state.

But when a Justice Department inspector-general investigation uncovered politically charged messages that Strzok had exchanged with FBI attorney Lisa Page, he was relegated to a position in human resources. Conservatives soon made Strzok the face of their attacks against special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation of the president’s campaign, and the FBI took steps to remove Strzok from its ranks.

>>> <mma3>
Click to expand...
watch this until at least the 4:00 minute mark

 
JamesRussler said:
No. And honestly who came up with this retarded idea that we should want an “independent” DOJ? It’s like people hear that on CNN and they think “yeah, that sounds good, independence is always good.” No. We want the judiciary to be independent, because it’s a separate branch of government. But the AG is a department in the executive branch. Why would the POTUS appoint an AG to act “independent” and basically go rogue with his own agenda? That’s stupid. You brought up separation of powers, and you’re basically talking about separating the an executive agency from the executive branch. Get that idea out of your head. It’s wrong.
Click to expand...

There is still clearly a discussion to be had there imo. In Germany, state prosecutors report to the state ministers of justice. In other words, in theory, these are able to shut down investigations or get involved in cases (e.g. the rapid deportation of a well-publicized Islamist leech was likely due to such involvement).

There is a downside. The ECJ decided that the German prosecutors are not independent enough and therefore cannot be trusted to issue Europe-wide arrest warrants.
 
SIRGAY HARITONOB! said:
lauraloomer-realdonaldtrump-wow_-what-a-freak_.gif
Click to expand...

What a cheeky rascal! It's pretty obvious why Lisa Page fell so hard for him. *swoon*
 
PainIsLIfe said:
Great assesment and I dont believe any of the "answers" about the TT meeting. I don't think of the hack was a psa, but its hard to complain about dnc shenanigans being made public.
Click to expand...

Wow, this really illustrates the depths of moral rot on the right.
 
JDragon said:
There is still clearly a discussion to be had there imo. In Germany, state prosecutors report to the state ministers of justice. In other words, in theory, these are able to shut down investigations or get involved in cases (e.g. the rapid deportation of a well-publicized Islamist leech was likely due to such involvement).

There is a downside. The ECJ decided that the German prosecutors are not independent enough and therefore cannot be trusted to issue Europe-wide arrest warrants.
Click to expand...

Europe has its own way of doing things. Over here, power is divided into three branches—each with different “checks” on the powers of others, and varying degrees of political/democratic accountability. If you don’t like the way the president runs the executive branch, you can vote him out. If he broke the law, and your legislators agree, you may impeach him. Those are your remedies. Anything else runs afoul of the constitution, and upsets a very delicate balance of power.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Wow, this really illustrates the depths of moral rot on the right.
Click to expand...

How so Jack?

Other than the fact that you dont see anyrhing wrong with giving Clinton debate questions in advance, coordinated hiring between a campaign and unbiased part officials, or plotting ways to advance her over her rival campaign - what make my coment morally wrong?
 
PainIsLIfe said:
How so Jack?

Other than the fact that you dont see anyrhing wrong with giving Clinton debate questions in advance, coordinated hiring between a campaign and unbiased part officials, or plotting ways to advance her over her rival campaign - what make my coment morally wrong?
Click to expand...

You're celebrating illegal hacking by a hostile foreign country because anything that helps your party win is acceptable to you. You don't have any moral standards. Also note that you're egregiously misrepresenting what was found, but that's to be expected (you guys just lie all the time--part of the same issue).
 
Good. Strzok is one of the best agents in FBI history. He has saved countless American lives.
 
Jack V Savage said:
You're celebrating illegal hacking by a hostile foreign country because anything that helps your party win is acceptable to you. You don't have any moral standards. Also note that you're egregiously misrepresenting what was found, but that's to be expected (you guys just lie all the time--part of the same issue).
Click to expand...

No Jackie, I didnt celebrate the hack and I didn't vote for Trump in the election. And since I'm an independent I dont have a party.


Hey, but I lol'd a few times - especially when the chick giving the answers to Clinton told reporters that that info wasnt admissible in a court of law whe Asked if she really did it.
 
PainIsLIfe said:
No Jackie, I didnt celebrate the hack and I didn't vote for Trump in the election. And since I'm an independent I dont have a party.

Hey, but I lol'd a few times - especially when the chick giving the answers to Clinton told reporters that that info wasnt admissible in a court of law whe Asked if she really did it.
Click to expand...

You said that the hacking was a public service. If you're backtracking on that, then you're not illustrating the moral rot on the right, though your unwillingness to admit that you need to backtrack still reflects quite badly on you as an individual.
 
Jack V Savage said:
You said that the hacking was a public service. If you're backtracking on that, then you're not illustrating the moral rot on the right, though your unwillingness to admit that you need to backtrack still reflects quite badly on you as an individual.
Click to expand...

You missed a few words in the post. What I actually said was:

I don't think of the hack was a psa, but its hard to complain about dnc shenanigans being made public.


I dont really expect an apology from you though because then you'd be admitting that the Russian hacks made the public aware of how deceptive the DNC was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,953
Messages
58,472,540
Members
176,047
Latest member
derpmaster3000

Share this page

Back
Top