- Joined
- Nov 14, 2019
- Messages
- 22,787
- Reaction score
- 50,164

In the recent women’s bantamweight fight between Juliana Peña and Raquel Pennington, Peña walked away with a split decision victory, but there’s been a lot of debate surrounding the first round. I’m challenging all you Sherbums over at Sherdog to take another look at that round and re-evaluate who actually won it.
Peña clearly outstruck Pennington 25 to 17 in that first round, and when you do the math, that’s a 47% difference in Peña’s favor. Despite what some might say, the stats back her up in that round. So why are so many people convinced that Pennington won?
I think it’s the visual bias against Peña’s sloppy striking mechanics. Yeah, we all know Peña doesn’t have the cleanest form—her punches can look awkward—but that doesn’t mean they weren’t landing. She was catching Pennington on the chin multiple times, especially when Raquel would lunge forward. Peña was intercepting her strikes cleanly, but because of the unorthodox way she throws punches, it seems like a lot of fans are just brushing that off.
So, I’m calling on everyone here to rewatch that first round without letting Peña’s weird punching style cloud your judgment. Look at the stats, and look at who was actually landing more. Let’s discuss who really won that round based on facts, not aesthetics.