You'll need to provide more details. What did Nunes say, where and what is the evidence that proves he was correct, and what did Schiff say? And please provide sources.
And if you don't, I'll accuse you of making it up and carry on saying whatever the fuck I want about how Nunes. And if you complain that you just shouldn't have to be bothered, you're just going to have to suck it up if you want to uphold the standard you and the other sea lions in the Trump/Ukraine thread have set with your supposed complete ignorance of the facts surrounding the alleged bribery such that you want every last detail from the last 10 threads reiterated to you before you will accept the truth. And please have evidence, not just a bunch of people's third hand information and opinions.
And I'm going to make a prediction before you even get there. I predict a careful reading of the text will show that he's disingenuously misrepresenting the issue. But I'm capable of being persuaded by a strong case. I am interested to see what you have.
Objective evaluation of evidence aside, he is a lying unprincipled cunt who hitched his wagon to the Trump train early on and will do or say literally anything, as long as there is some slight plausible deniability, to make Trump look good, and to make any Democrat or anyone else Trump has designated, look bad, regardless of how much of a departure from the truth it is.
