I read the case in many sources and it likely is a petty-misdemeanor
Police used the deliberately vague phrase “a restroom incident requiring a change of clothing” because reports normally avoid graphic detail. In plain language it almost certainly means the passenger soiled or badly spilled on her pants in Jones’ bathroom—vomit, urine, menstrual leakage, etc. She therefore took her pants off, asked Jon Jones to drive her home so she could put on something clean, and left the house wearing only whatever was still on her upper body (a long shirt, hoodie, or blanket). When officers reached the crash site they noted she was “lacking clothing from the waist down,” which is exactly what the MMA-news outlets quoted from the complaint.
US law-enforcement style generally tell officers to record facts without unnecessary graphic detail — especially where victims might be embarrassed or the information is only tangentially relevant to the charge. Instead they use catch-alls like “restroom incident,” “bodily-fluid event,” or “medical episode requiring a change of clothes.”
The New Mexico complaint against Jones follows that pattern: it mentions the restroom mishap only to explain why the woman took off her pants and why she asked Jones to drive her home.
As for the bathroom, what happened is likely common real-world reasons someone suddenly needs new pants... which fits the police reports.
Incontinence from alcohol, mushrooms or both can lead to loss of bladder or bowel movement control ... mix of psilocybin and alcohol can cause nausea, diarrhea, or loss of muscle control; victims often remove soiled clothes immediately.
Vomiting that splashed heavily on lap and legs —> Reports still call this a “restroom incident”; the result is the same — pants are unwearable.
Heavy menstrual bleed-through (possible if alcohol thins blood and timing aligns) —> Officers rarely specify; they just note the clothing change.
Large-volume liquid spill (drink knocked over onto lap) which fits the vague phrasing and would not require medical detail.
Nothing in the complaint claims sexual activity or assault occurred inside the house. The incident is framed as embarrassing but under medical/accidental lens.
She likely left without pants because:
1 Jones’ house had no spare clothes her size.
2 - She wanted her own clean items from home.
3 - Psilocybin + alcohol impair reasoning; “let’s just go now” is a common impulsive response.
4 - She likely covered herself with a long hoodie, blanket or car seat jacket... officers only wrote that she lacked lower-body garments.
People generally ride home in underwear or wrapped in a coat after vomiting or incontinence incidents... it is embarrassing but not unusual in medical transports, college campuses, or bar districts. Police files document these cases with identical phrasing.
And the change-of-clothing detail showed the reason: she says Jones agreed to drive her, so he was behind the wheel. She being half naked helps police argue she was incapacitated and could not legally be the driver herself. Under New Mexico, leaving an intoxicated, half-naked passenger at a crash still satisfies the misdemeanor hit-and-run statute even if no other car was hit.
Tl;dr —> “Restroom incident requiring a change of clothing” is more than likely sanitized police shorthand for a messy bodily mishap. She removed her soiled pants, planned to ride with Jones to fetch clean ones, and wound up at a crash scene without them. The odd phrasing reflects report-writing conventions, not necessarily something sinister — but it does show her impairment and why prosecutors claim Jones had a legal duty to stay and help.
That is is officially a petty-misdemeanor, not a felony. The criminal summons filed in Bernalillo County charges him with one count of “Leaving the scene of an accident (no great bodily harm or death)” —> which New Mexico classifies at the lowest misdemeanor tier —> maximum six months in county jail, up to a $1,000 fine, and short-term licence loss. No DUI, assault or felony-level.
And not a felony because New Mexico upgrades hit-and-run to a fourth-degree felony only when the crash causes “great bodily harm or death” or to a third-degree felony if someone dies, but the complaint states the passenger did not report serious physical injury, and the other vehicle’s occupants (if any) were unhurt, so prosecutors filed the lower tier. Only new proof of serious bodily harm, impairment, or assault would push it into felony range, tho nothing in the public record hints that prosecutors saw that in investigations.
Though whatever is the truth, it must prevail.