- Joined
- Sep 14, 2021
- Messages
- 4,547
- Reaction score
- 6,934
Some how 7 idiots agree with your post.O’Malley whooped his ass. End of story.
Some how 7 idiots agree with your post.O’Malley whooped his ass. End of story.
Someone else who likes the old rules more?! There are dozens of us! DOOOZEEEENNSS!
So biased against grapplers period. I feel like since the new rules refs stand up fighters WAY too quickly. They’ll say it’s because they’re not advancing or throwing submission attempts but that shit can take time.I miss them. They nerfed wrestling big time because UFC hates wrestlers unless they are from Dagestan.
Exactly.
So biased against grapplers period. I feel like since the new rules refs stand up fighters WAY too quickly. They’ll say it’s because they’re not advancing or throwing submission attempts but that shit can take time.
I remember GSP said that he thinks that rounds are a leftover from boxing and that regular fights should be a single, 15 minute round and titles and main events a 25 minute round. I would love to see that! Would be great for grapplers.
O’Malley whooped his ass. End of story.
The reality is the vast majority of people who scored the fight for O'Malley very clearly did not actually tune into the fight, or have chosen to completely and totally block out these moments.
Sean lost the fight, just about everyone, and surely everyone with a brain in their skull recognizes this.
![]()
![]()
There is no argument for O'malley to win the first if you score it by the criteria. Yan was pressing the action, landed the bigger shots and landed the above takedown. He won every criteria available in MMA judging. Even if someone says that the striking was equal, Yan still wins by being the one moving forward and initiating the action.
If you give the striking to O'malley and then also take into account the grappling, 2 takedowns one being a pick up slam with follow up ground and pound, you still need to score it for Yan.
Big takedown, leading to control and ground and pound in the most significant moment in that round. Even though I believe Yan also won the striking, if I give it to O'malley the takedown and follow up wins that round given the striking was still close no matter who you gave it to.
It's the definition of a robbery in that an MMA judge has no conceivable argument to score the first for O'malley.
No arguments here, I thought the decision was as clear as it gets, and have this down as one of the absolute worst robberies I've witnessed in my 20+ years of watching the sport. It was putrid, but I wasn't terribly surprised given how the UFC clearly views O'Malley as a potential moneymaker going forward.
If you get cracked in the head 18 more times in only a 3 round fight, it's kinda hard to mislead that one.that's the entire point
the numbers are misleading, just like they are for sig strikes
Very true. Not all strikes are equal, and MMA stats after a fight don't always tell the whole story.Stats always lie in MMA.
Sean landing a single jab, and Yan landing that huge counter that nearly knocked O'Malley unconscious in round 2 are technically both considered one significant strike each on paper.
Cuts and blood don't mean shit. Glancing blows have caused plenty of cuts. Are you new here?Yan was a bloody mess at the end of the fight after getting beat up on the feet and the stats show Sean outstruck Yan overall
Cuts and blood don't mean shit. Glancing blows have caused plenty of cuts. Are you new here?
Also, no. Sean did not outstrike Yan overall.
UFC stats show Yan landed 97 of 139 strikes. Omalley with 91 of 171.
Look again: http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/5c3c4bcc6c746ca0
No. Body shots matter, leg strikes matter.The most important stats you should be looking at is where they were landing their strikes. Sean landed a lot more head strikes than Yan which typically have the most weight in scoring.
No. Body shots matter, leg strikes matter.
Yan landed the harder strikes, Omalley landed more jabs.
You're trying to cherry pick which strikes to count because you want to favor Omalley. Just stop, you look really stupid arguing that point of trying to discredit other forms of damage.
most jabs don't 'crack' like thatIf you get cracked in the head 18 more times in only a 3 round fight, it's kinda hard to mislead that one.