Elections Official US 2024 Presidential Election Megathread: Trump v Harris

Who is going to win?

  • Total voters
    174
Status
Not open for further replies.
AWilder said:
Hey there were no coup attempts UNDER a trump presidency, is clearly he's the better guy if you're not a fan of coups right? The hang mike pence thing was under Biden so it's all Democrats fault, right?
Click to expand...
I just said I hope you’re right that Harris stops the genocide
 
Rob Battisti said:
I just said I hope you’re right that Harris stops the genocide
Click to expand...
Do you think we should start calling trump Mr Peace because he's so peaceful? He makes Buddha look like a monster. I'm a big fan of his peaceful rhetoric calling his political opposition demons and calling for the military to round them up, also I love his Christian morality of rounding up and deporting immigrants. Nothing but peace and love from the most peaceful president ever, right?

Wouldn't want to move the goalposts
 
AWilder said:
Do you think we should start calling trump Mr Peace because he's so peaceful? He makes Buddha look like a monster. I'm a big fan of his peaceful rhetoric calling his political opposition demons and calling for the military to round them up, also I love his Christian morality of rounding up and deporting immigrants. Nothing but peace and love from the most peaceful president ever, right?

Wouldn't want to move the goalposts
Click to expand...
Take your meds
 
Squarechoke said:
As your quote shows I'm asking why not everyone is doing something, and how you're getting that to be a specific number is beyond me. The number I specified not doing the thing in question is represented as "<100%", so every number except 100% is in play.
Click to expand...
LMAO @ "hey just by saying EVERYONE which means 100% doesn't mean it's a number cause i didn't EXPLICITLY say the actual number."
that's the most desperately dumb thing i read in the war room this year.
Squarechoke said:
that can only be inferred from what I said, it wasn't the statement.
Click to expand...
yeah, that's how communication works, genius.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
LMAO @ "hey just by saying EVERYONE which means 100% doesn't mean it's a number cause i didn't EXPLICITLY say the actual number."
that's the most desperately dumb thing i read in the war room this year.

yeah, that's how communication works, genius.
Click to expand...

You're confusing the statements. I first asked why not everyone are reacting strongly to such a blatant lie. You then basically said that people don't speak up in public, to which I responded that I've seen that happen several times and that your point doesn't matter as much since some of those that don't criticize such behavior still don't criticize it online when they are anonymous (proving that the kind of people I said don't deserve a functioning society actually do exist). The latter is the statement where you criticized my use of "some".

So the only clear number we have is seeing what percentage I think should be criticizing blatant lying (everyone). Since my use of "some" in the second statement is talking about a part of the group that isn't criticizing there is obviously no number used because the group that isn't criticizing was never more defined than <100%.
 
Squarechoke said:
You're confusing the statements. I first asked why not everyone are reacting strongly to such a blatant lie. You then basically said that people don't speak up in public, to which I responded that I've seen that happen several times and that your point doesn't matter as much since some of those that don't criticize such behavior still don't criticize it online when they are anonymous (proving that the kind of people I said don't deserve a functioning society actually do exist). The latter is the statement where you criticized my use of "some".

So the only clear number we have is seeing what percentage I think should be criticizing blatant lying (everyone). Since my use of "some" in the second statement is talking about a part of the group that isn't criticizing there is obviously no number used because the group that isn't criticizing was never more defined than <100%.
Click to expand...
serious question, are you mentally retarded?
 


The camera man live fact checking Trump's bullshit is glorious.

Somebody buy this man a beer
 
Shaun K said:
You still haven’t answered the initial questions, sir. Go back and read


Also, i bet she was quite popular at parties
I cant believe you went to Berkeley and dont understand how unsustainable any of the shit they preach is. You clearly have a liberal arts degree.
Click to expand...
LOL! Your post highlights your ignorance, you don't even know her background. Do you even read the news or just skim the memes that come across your stormfront feed?

I'm afraid you are gonna be really disappointed when the election results come out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

HOLA
Economy Most Trump tariffs are not legal, US appeals court rules
Replies
10
Views
245
Revolver
Revolver

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,191
Messages
57,973,653
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top