Goreds1994
Silver Belt
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
- Messages
- 10,349
- Reaction score
- 0
Difference with them was, Mo got absolutely robbed. He clearly won 2 rounds. Even the one Rampage round was close.
Luke Thomas asking the tough question to Mo and Bjorn. Didn't sound like the other journalists agreed with the judge's decision in the main event. King Mo isn't pressing the issue though saying he doesn't want to talk about it.
lmfao bjorn saying he scored it for rampage. this is so pathetic
haha bjorn agrees with the brooks decision too.
never again
See, like I said he agrees with decisions whether they benefit him or not. That's his M.O. I guess civil honesty would be the most likable approach for a promoter, but the head of the other major organization is massively inflammatory in a frequently biased way. If I gotta pick one of the two approaches, I guess I prefer Bjorn's.
Jeremy Botter
‏@jeremybotter
There are lots of rumors circulating about Bjorn's immediate future with Viacom. One thing is for certain: he is not well liked. By anyone.
yes it was great scenario for them, they needed new blood for LW division, because just Alvares vs Candler endless shit became kinda boringPeople acting like this is fixed or there's corruption are stupid, why would they want Chandler to lose? Guy got robbed I don't think that was exactly an ideal scenario for them...
There's nothing wrong with the Rampage decision either...
yes it was great scenario for them, they needed new blood for LW division, because just Alvares vs Candler endless shit became kinda boring
tennis finals saturday:
got 2u djok +120 & 2u serena U18.5
can't resist the djok +odds, even tho it's nadal on clay.. will be live betting it, tho.
and serena vs errani is a HW vs a LW. last time they played, she won 6-0 6-1..