• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Official UFC 173 Betting Thread - Post Your Bets!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Today would have been alright if Mo had won..

I'm about 3 weeks into betting

2v8lm3a.png
 
when the fuck are people gonna start asking questions. this is retarded
 
They always do opening remarks and then open the floor to journalist questions.
 
You realize that the UFC doesn't appoint the judges, right?

They do for international events.

But you're right, for a good majority of events, including this one, Bellator nor UFC appoint judges, so to blame them for decisions you don't agree with is irrational.

And if Bellator did appoint judges, I'm sure they wouldn't pick unfavorable ones to Michael Chandler. That was the worst decision of the night, not even defensible, and it went against Bellator's interests. And I say this as someone who got a big ROI on that (incorrect) outcome.

The Rampage fight went to Bellator's interests, but it was totally defensible. Rampage landed a few strikes of significance in the 3rd rd to about Mo's 1, and he was the aggressor. That should count more than holding. People complain when it's rewarded, and when it's not. Pick a side. I pick damage and engaging in a fight rather than avoiding one. And btw I had nothing on this fight.
 
I thought it was weird once the commentator starting saying he thought rampage won. You got in attendance the mayor of memphis who just called the day rampage day, the owner of a wrestling company that uses rampage, and the boss who needs rampage to win smiling.
 
ok this is unwatchable stream. hope some reporters ask some good questions, will read them later

tito:

"i think god put me on earth as a tool"

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"everything was pre-played out" (meaning destiny? or fix!? haha, kidding)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top