Obama lied to america about Iran. . . Why was the deal so important to him?

[Judge]

Ok, so Obama lied about financials with Iran at the Iran deal time. Obama thought it was very important to get the Iran deal done?
BUT WHY?
It would have zero effect on any election and it would not have done anything good for Americans...So one has to wonder WHY??? Why lie about finances and Iran cooperating with nuclear deal????? Who benefits?

If Iran gets sanctions lifted, it gets more money. Now, what would the LEADER OF STATE SPONSORED TERROR do with more money???

Let's use some facts to see.

https://apnews.com/27e8179cf10140dca7eb86b3488f01e2
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31510/obama-administration-lied-american-people-ben-shapiro
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31509/report-obama-administration-secretly-gave-iran-hank-berrien

"""
The Obama administration attempted to end-around its own sanctions in order to give cash to the worst terror sponsor on the planet. Here’s the report:

The report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations revealed that under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars. If the Omani bank had allowed the exchange without such a license, it would have violated sanctions that bar Iran from transactions that touch the U.S. financial system.

Only the fact that U.S. banks didn’t want to violate American law prevented Iran from getting its hands on $5.7 billion more in U.S. dollars. As Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) explained, “The Obama administration misled the American people and Congress because they were desperate to get a deal with Iran.” The Obama administration repeatedly lied — over and over again — about their supposed unwillingness to allow Iran “access to the US financial system.” Obama’s Treasury Secretary Jack Lew even testified to that effect.
"""

Now, what would Iran do with money? Oh, support terrorism against Israel. I posit, that Obama wanted the Iran deal so bad to get money to Iran so Iran could continue to attack Israel.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/31514/who-financed-hamas-riots-targeting-israel-one-hank-berrien

"""
You’ll never guess who financed the violent riots instituted for weeks by Hamas on the Israel-Gaza border.

Go to the head of the class if you answered Iran.

And the revelation that Iran was backing the attempt for Hamas operatives to gain access to Israel and possibly slaughter innocents didn’t come from Israel; it came from the Palestinian Authority, according to Israel’s Channel 10. Channel 10 reported that the Palestinian Authority informed the French government last month that Iran was financing the Hamas-organized efforts.
"""

 

[wonderbread]

 

[Rygu]

Obama sucked, that's why.

 

[Seano]

It does seem like they went above and beyond to make this Iran deal that doesn't really benefit anyone but Iran.

 

[GetTheseHands]

Propaganda Media: Obama NEVER had a scandal in his presidency

 

[bobgeese]

Obama considered himself a citizen of the world.

That’s not what we want in a president. We want America First.

 

[GetTheseHands]

It does seem like they went above and beyond to make this Iran deal that doesn't really benefit anyone but Iran.

Because they wanted to undermine Israel, the left HATES Israel and supports groups that want them destroyed.

 

[V Belfort]

U sure they are the leader of state sponsored terrorism? Guess the sunni terrorist attacks just false flag then...

My guess would be that Obama might had a more balanced/ less saudi lead Islam in mind, in the middle east at least. Like india and pakistan, both have the bomb but mainly just barkin.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

I certainly think that it was an ideological move against Israel and also a geo political one on the behalf of Europe.

Obama/Dems and the Europen power structures are backing Iran and their proposed pipeline through Syria to provide energy to Europe. the alternative would be the Republican backed Saudi one. Europe doesn't want to be beholden to Russia for Energy so a pipeline from one of those two middle eastern states in one of their top priorities. In addition, countries like France have roots in Iran and their oil industry wanted to swoop in and grab all the infrastructure contracts.

The Obama administration did the bidding of France in Libya, then they did the bidding of France and Europe with Iran.

Obama, the left, and the deep state can all be traced back to old European power structures that heavily dictate NATO policy and even US foreign policy.

 

[nac386]

It does seem like they went above and beyond to make this Iran deal that doesn't really benefit anyone but Iran.

How did the deal benefit Iran and not benefit anybody else?

 

[Deleted member 457759]

How did the deal benefit Iran and not benefit anybody else?

What benefits Iran hurts everyone else because of their gargantuan support for terrorist operations around the world.

What rock have you been under?

 

[nac386]

What benefits Iran hurts everyone else because of their gargantuan support for terrorist operations around the world.

What rock have you been under?

That was not the question that was asked at all. You seem to have created a question and answered it for yourself.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

That was not the question that was asked at all. You seem to have created a question and answered it for yourself.

Ok to answer your question it can't. France had a lot to gain, as well as Europe in general.

 

[nac386]

Ok to answer your question it can't. France had a lot to gain, as well as Europe in general.

The point of the deal was to make it impossible for Iran to develop two necessary components for nuclear weapons, with regular checks every 90 days to ensure that was happening.

Does the world not benefit from that?

 

[Seaside]

Even if you right your country is so divided that most other side wont care unless it proved on video he Obama wanted to destroy USA.

I certainly think that it was an ideological move against Israel and also a geo political one on the behalf of Europe.

Obama/Dems and the Europen power structures are backing Iran and their proposed pipeline through Syria to provide energy to Europe. the alternative would be the Republican backed Saudi one. Europe doesn't want to be beholden to Russia for Energy so a pipeline from one of those two middle eastern states in one of their top priorities. In addition, countries like France have roots in Iran and their oil industry wanted to swoop in and grab all the infrastructure contracts.

The Obama administration did the bidding of France in Libya, then they did the bidding of France and Europe with Iran.

Obama, the left, and the deep state can all be traced back to old European power structures that heavily dictate NATO policy and even US foreign policy.

Europe actually does not mind having to take most energy from Russia. The Báltic sea pipeline is being more expanded with German help. The Germans and many other EU nationalist types and even moderates like or do not mind Russia. Europe was going easy on sanations ano wanted less but US under Obama wanted more sanctions for Crimea annexation. Which is another (bs lie couple started by the west). American state department people and intelligence people have admit to saying "fuck the EU" about them not wanting to do more sanctions and former CIA directors have admittedone what enature world intelligence community has know which is US regime changes and is behind many coup and electoral fraud or misleading.


I think on foreign policy though there is split. Many EU brass are non aggressive to Russia in past it has always been Americans and British who the war monger pushers. It was mostly cia and mi6 in Ukraine funding fascists and neo nazis. Poland has anti Russian media because there history oppression but they Poland are not threatened by Russia. Then far left in europa not like Russia because it policy on gays and trans.

I think it obvious that the Iran deal was is suppos to be most non aggressive way to slow down Iran and hope they dont go for nuke. But again there is no way you can for sure stop there he unless you regime change or destroy their abilities by military action and even there hemmed they could build it back within 5 years unless you also destroy their military and even thwrehemhenhn they can come back in future.

It obvious that lookin at deal Russia China for it because they dont want uclear Iran and agree but my guess is that that they even nuclear armed Iran is not threat to threat to them and that in future Iran may have more peaceful regime change and reward the country nice to it like Russia. The European acceptance of Iran deal I think more about not causing conflict and appeasing Russia and China.

 

[44nutman]

What benefits Iran hurts everyone else because of their gargantuan support for terrorist operations around the world.

What rock have you been under?

The House of Saud is the biggest supporters of Terrorists in the World and we have US troops in Yemen at behest of the Sauds.

If you think Iran sucks, then you should really hate the Saudi's.

My middle east policy would be to arm both sides and watch them destroy each other.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

The point of the deal was to make it impossible for Iran to develop two necessary components for nuclear weapons, with regular checks every 90 days to ensure that was happening.

Does the world not benefit from that?

In one way yes. But if the trade off is Iran having hundreds of billions of dollars into terrorist activity then obviously not.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

The House of Saud is the biggest supporters of Terrorists in the World and we have US troops in Yemen at behest of the Sauds.

If you think Iran sucks, then you should really hate the Saudi's.

My middle east policy would be to arm both sides and watch them destroy each other.

The difference between the two is that the Iranian leadership, the government as a sovereign state are funding terrorism and using its intelligence agencies to provide support. The royal family hasn't supported terrorism. Its wealthy people from Saudi Arabia and the Arabian peninsula who are big on funding through Arab finance hard to track.

 

[Seano]

How did the deal benefit Iran and not benefit anybody else?

Because it was filled with loopholes and exceptions that made it a deal for Iran with no benefit to anyone else.

If the deal benefited everyone, why the lies about it?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...se-let-iran-tap-dollars/ar-AAyhWgQ?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[Seano]

U sure they are the leader of state sponsored terrorism? Guess the sunni terrorist attacks just false flag then...
.

Nah, they all right.