Yet ever anti-semite is anti-Israel.
The difference is when has the supposedly not-anti-semite ever praised Israel, and he hasn't?
According to anti-semites & Islamic propaganda.
There's claims he used the term in private, and when asked about it he denied it, but refused to condemn it.
- Initial Refusal to Condemn: During a podcast interview with The Bulwark in June 2025, Mamdani was asked if the phrase made him uncomfortable and declined to condemn it, arguing it was an expression of Palestinian rights.•• He also stated on "Meet the Press" that "that’s not the language that I use" but added, "I don’t believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech."••
- Later Clarification: In response to backlash, Mamdani later clarified his position to a group of New York City business leaders in July 2025. He stated that he would not use the phrase himself and would "discourage" others from doing so.• He explained that while some use it as an expression of solidarity with Palestinians, he acknowledged that many New Yorkers view it as a reference to violence against Israel.•
This is politispeak for 'I'm a politician so I cannot say it, but I can support it.'
Yeah, just like the black community calling black Republicans 'uncle toms.'
Jews are like any other group, and a portion of every group are fools.
I have a few former Muslim friends who are now atheist.
Quran 4:89 This is the most frequently cited verse used to argue for a worldly punishment for apostasy.
"They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away [i.e., refuse], then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper."
Take a guess what the Quran instructs for Muslims to do with Infidels.
And you have nothing of substance to say in response to that, because it's true.
No one really takes you seriously, Ares.
Your posts defending Zohran in this thread are another reason why.