Not Just a Cohencidence (Mueller/Investigation Thread v.20)

[HOLA]

Dershowitz, iirc, first used the jaywalking excuse on Tucker Carlson, which is hilarious.

Fox News law and order logic appears to be:

Felony violation of election laws? Not a big deal!

Misdemeanor illegal border entry? GLOBAL EMERGENCY!

 

[HomerThompson]

I have never seen

It's absolutely breathtaking that Cohen specifically admitting to and detailing committing a crime in a court of law is not good enough to convince people a crime even took place.
This is truly, weirdly beautiful.
It's like a sunrise made out of madness.

 

[HomerThompson]

Do you know the point that Dershowitz was making with that argument?

That he's a washed up hack?

 

[waiguoren]

That he's a washed up hack?

I don't think that was the point Dershowitz was making, no.

 

[HomerThompson]

I don't think that was the point Dershowitz was making, no.

Certainly not the one he was intending to make, but here we are.

 

[waiguoren]

Felony violation of election laws? Not a big deal!

Misdemeanor illegal border entry? GLOBAL EMERGENCY!

One has resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent people as well as significant damage to state and local government budgets.

The other saved us from having to hear from a porn actress in the mainstream media for at least a few months.

 

[waiguoren]

Certainly not the one he was intending to make, but here we are.

I wonder why you so frequently attack the character of those who disagree with you. Perhaps it is because you do not have strong counter-arguments available to you.

 

[HomerThompson]

I wonder why you so frequently attack the character of those who disagree with you. Perhaps it is because you do not have strong counter-arguments available to you.

Perhaps it's because I don't have patience for disingenuous fuckery. You're the most dishonest poster on this board. And the things you've been typing for the last week are borderline delusional. You're a partisan hack, and it's too bad because you're not a complete idiot, and your lack of morality and hubris prevent you from learning and becoming a better person.

But, either way, I'm taking that sig when Trump goes down in flames. And you can kiss the 87th percentile of my nuts.

 

[HOLA]

One has resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent people as well as significant damage to state and local government budgets.

The other saved us from having to hear from a porn actress in the mainstream media for at least a few months.

I think you're confusing illegal border entry with murder. 2 different crimes.

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

You know what? You're right.
Toads are cool.
Sincerest apologies.

They appreciate the sincerity. But for real she does look like a toad could be under that face

 

[Fawlty]

Do you understand what pleading guilty does omg lolololololol
For god sake man
I'm gonna shit in my pants from laughter. Fuck, I actually howled.

Remember the BTK Killer? Not necessarily crimes.

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

I wonder why you so frequently attack the character of those who disagree with you. Perhaps it is because you do not have strong counter-arguments available to you.

Because your character is extremely flawed. I mean it’s a very simple answer.

You’re defending someone who routinely lies, cheats and makes up stories. On top of that he’s surrounded himself with crooks and others who blatantly lie.

This thread alone has shown proof of that countless times and yet you either don’t care or have your head stuck somewhere dark and smelly

 

[waiguoren]

Perhaps it's because I don't have patience for disingenuous fuckery. You're the most dishonest poster on this board. And the things you've been typing for the last week are borderline delusional. You're a partisan hack, and it's too bad because you're not a complete idiot, and your lack of morality and hubris prevent you from learning and becoming a better person.

I love you.

But, either way, I'm taking that sig when Trump goes down in flames. And you can kiss the 87th percentile of my nuts.

Just curious, by what means do you expect Trump to "go down in flames"?

 

[waiguoren]

Because your character is extremely flawed. I mean it’s a very simple answer.

You’re defending someone who routinely lies, cheats and makes up stories. On top of that he’s surrounded himself with crooks and others who blatantly lie.

This thread alone has shown proof of that countless times and yet you either don’t care or have your head stuck somewhere dark and smelly

I also defend the right of evil groups such as antifa to march in the streets. Does that make me a "defender of antifa"?

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

You're the most dishonest poster on this board.

 

[HomerThompson]

I love you.




Just curious, by what means do you expect Trump to "go down in flames"?

See our already existing bet for details.

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

I also defend the right of evil groups such as antifa to march in the streets. Does that make me a "defender of antifa"?

Lol cool talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Slick move. I expect that from someone who worships a liar, fraud and con man.

Dump has changed his answer so many times it’s obvious he’s lying. Each lie contradicts the previous one and so on and so on. But you still believe every word that comes from his mouth even though he’s clearly lying.

For Pete’s sake the guy has a tweet from the past contradicting just about everything he says now. It’s hilarious you claim you have good character

 

[HOLA]

I wonder why you so frequently attack the character of those who disagree with you. Perhaps it is because you do not have strong counter-arguments available to you.

And people didn't really say much more about Rudy Giuliani's "truth isn't truth" other than "that's fucking stupid" because there's not much to analyze. Capisce?

No? All right then.

 

[waiguoren]

See our already existing bet for details.

I know that you think it will happen either by impeachment/removal or the 25th Amendment. Do you view both routes as equally likely? If you view the first as more likely, does that mean you expect over 16 Senate Republicans to vote to remove Trump from office, or do you expect the Senate to switch to the Democrats after November?

 

[HomerThompson]

I know that you think it will happen either by impeachment/removal or the 25th Amendment. Do you view both routes as equally likely? If you view the first as more likely, does that mean you expect over 16 Senate Republicans to vote to remove Trump from office, or do you expect the Senate to switch to the Democrats after November?

I expect the Senate gap to narrow enough for impeachment to occur, along with a Democratic House, of course.