Not Just a Cohencidence (Mueller/Investigation Thread v.20)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol cool talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

The point is an important one: defending due process and the rule of law does is not the same as an endorsement of a particular person's views, morality, or innocence.

Dump has changed his answer so many times it’s obvious he’s lying. Each lie contradicts the previous one and so on and so on. But you still believe every word that comes from his mouth even though he’s clearly lying.

I certainly don't believe every word that comes out of his mouth. For example, he appears not to understand the difference between budget and trade deficits.

It’s hilarious you claim you have good character

I don't claim to have good character. I only claim to do my best to be a good person.
 
Lol cool talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Slick move. I expect that from someone who worships a liar, fraud and con man.

Dump has changed his answer so many times it’s obvious he’s lying. Each lie contradicts the previous one and so on and so on. But you still believe every word that comes from his mouth even though he’s clearly lying.

For Pete’s sake the guy has a tweet from the past contradicting just about everything he says now. It’s hilarious you claim you have good character
"Never believe that MAGA Hatters are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The MAGA Hatters have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

-Sartre

Switch in MAGA Hatters for the original word - quote works pretty good.
 
I expect the Senate gap to narrow enough for impeachment to occur, along with a Democratic House, of course.

That would require some 18 Republicans and all ~48 Democrats. Highly unlikely, in my opinion. Looking forward to it!
 
And people didn't really say much more about Rudy Giuliani's "truth isn't truth" other than "that's fucking stupid" because there's not much to analyze. Capisce?

I agree with Giuliani. He argued, ineloquently, that a man can be charged with perjury despite telling the truth. That's accurate.
 
The point is an important one: defending due process and the rule of law does is not the same as an endorsement of a particular person's views, morality, or innocence.



I certainly don't believe every word that comes out of his mouth. For example, he appears not to understand the difference between budget and trade deficits.



I don't claim to have good character. I only claim to do my best to be a good person.


Well you’re failing miserably. You put your trust into a blatant cheat and charlatan. Then act foolish enough to defend it tooth and nail
 
I agree with Giuliani. He argued, ineloquently, that a man can be charged with perjury despite telling the truth. That's accurate.
5aeab8602000004200b9052a.jpeg
 
Well you’re failing miserably. You put your trust into a blatant cheat and charlatan. Then act foolish enough to defend it tooth and nail
Trump is the social order guy. It's the 21st century version of:

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

Just add in Mexicans, Muslims, trannies, whatever.

They don't a FUCK what else he does, so long as this stays. They'll put up with anything to maintain it. Trump gave these dorks a precious gift, and liberals were trying to take it away. They'll go down in flames for Daddy.
 
Certainly not without an independent, formal finding of fact
I lold just typing that
I can't believe he has stayed in prison voluntarily this whole time. Crazy to think he has when he was never even found guilty of a crime.
 
Certainly not without an independent, formal finding of fact
I lold just typing that
You guys sure are silly. Dennis Rader was convicted by a jury of his peers. No plea agreement was signed.

Edit: apparently he changed his "not guilty" plea to "guilty". Therefore the jury did not convict him. Still, the case has nothing to with plea agreements.
 
Last edited:
You guys sure are silly. Dennis Rader was convicted by a jury of his peers. No plea agreement was signed.
Oh i'm definitely a very silly person
I'll plead guilty to that right away
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top