Not Just a Cohencidence (Mueller/Investigation Thread v.20)

Status
Not open for further replies.


Pretty sure courts don't take guilty pleas just for the fuck of it, so yeah, it's a crime you dildo.
 
Plea deals and ppl turning on Trump because of their own dirt still doesn’t move the needle in Trump but keep the circle jerk going
 
Trump's probably on the phone to Putin right now, asking him if he can send some Novichok in the Russian Embassy Diplomatic Pouch.

"Don't worry, Vlad. I'll just blame Muller's death on Iran!";)
 
Mark Hunts FIST said:
Trump did not collude with Russia.

If there was even a shred of that evidence it would have came out long before.

What I'm supposed to believe, the federal government has proof Trump colluded (and if so, he would be a liabilty without a doubt.)
and had left him in office 2 years.

To me.... that is unbelievable.

And I hope Manafort and Cohen spend time in the clink, tax evading scum buckets if you ask me.

The only thing that matters to most Republicans is the Russia collusion, not payments to a whore.
Click to expand...
I realize right now is a tough time for you, but you might want to pull your head out of your own ass and actually read some of the posts itt:

He said he will provide Special Counsel Robert Mueller with evidence that Trump worked with Russia to sway the election.


"Michael Cohen knows information that would be of interest to the Special Counsel regarding both knowledge about a conspiracy to corrupt American democracy by the Russians and the failure to report that knowledge to the FBI," said Davis.
Click to expand...
 
ShadowRun said:
Plea deals and ppl turning on Trump because of their own dirt still doesn’t move the needle in Trump but keep the circle jerk going
Click to expand...
It's gonna be alright, brother. Everything will be just fine.
 
PolishHeadlock said:
Evidence like his son, son in law and campaign manager meeting with Russian operatives?

His son asking for Russian dirt on Hillary in e-mails?

Trump asking for them to release dirt on Hillary on national television and Russia doing it?

The GOP changing their platform in regards to Russian and Ukrainian relations when Trump became the head of the ticket?
Click to expand...

Yes.

All these those things happened AFTER the hacking occurred.

Don't let a little thing like a timeline get in the way of your theory though.
 
Matt Schlapp lays the Schlappdown on menopausal CNN anchor. This one is like an 18-wheeler rolling over Bambi.



Camerota: Does it affect your support of Donald Trump?

Schlapp: The fact that Michael Cohen plead guilty to these charges? Not at all. Cohen is someone, like Paul Manafort, who had an elaborate scheme to not pay his taxes and committed a lot of financial crimes. In Cohen's case, because they had him over a barrel---because they had all these crimes that they could prosecute him for---they got him to sign a plea that was not negotiated. It was "take it or leave it". He signed it to save his own hide and to try to get a reduced sentence. It happens all the time in America.

Camerota: So just to be clear, Matt: you don't believe that President Trump directed him to make those payments to those two women and that it was to influence the presidential race?

Schlapp: All I can tell you is, Cohen taped all of or at least a lot of his conversation with the president, so if Cohen has some kind of proof that happened, we'll see it. I don't believe that proof exists. I think what happened is: Michael Cohen plead to charges that are actually not crimes according to the FEC, but that are an attempt to do anything to connect Cohen's wrongdoing to potential wrongdoing with Trump, andI think that's a travesty.

Camerota: Obviously, there are campaign finance laws and you're not allowed to make payments to mislead the American voter into voting for you. Number two, when you say there's no evidence, when you testify under oath, he did so in an open court. There are wire transfers, according to prosecutors, that show the money going from Michael Cohen and that money going to a porn actress and a Playboy model.

Schlapp: Right.

Camerota: There are the stories of the two women who say that they had affairs with Mr. Trump. You don't believe any of that?

Schlapp: What I'm answering your question on is, I don't believe that the transactions associated with these two people are FEC crimes. I believe that Michael Cohen plead guilty to actions that are called "crimes" in the plea deal that aren't actually crimes. Allison, can you name any other person in this country who has been convicted of trying to squelch a story in the National Enquirier? Name the names.

Camerota: What I think you're doing, is a lot of sort of fancy rhetorical footwork...

Schlapp: No, I'm answering your question.

Camerota: Well my question to you was, does it at all affect your support of Donald Trump to know all these things?

Schlapp: What, the fact that Donald Trump had an extravagant lifestyle?

Camerota: And may have had affairs with these two women he paid off in hush money.

Schlapp: I grew up outside of New York City for a number of years. I read all about Donald Trump. Nobody in my party and nobody of the folks that made up the Trump coalition were naive to the fact that the life that he had...

Camerota: So you were okay with those things.

Schlapp: No, I never said I was okay....

Camerota: Well, look! You support him, okay?

Schlapp: I support him strongly.

Camerota: So at some point, we have to connect the dots. You support him strongly. So at some point we have to...

Schlapp: Look, Allison, Allison, let me...I would like a minute here.

.....

It continues like this for four more minutes. This one is like Sullivan v. Araujo. Hard to watch the beatdown.
 
Last edited:
xcvbn said:
I realize right now is a tough time for you, but you might want to pull your head out of your own ass and actually read some of the posts itt:
Click to expand...

You really over estimate how much this concerns me. I'm having a fun conversation on the internet while I smoke some weed. I'm not too broken up

So bring in Pence and let's get this handmaid's tale started.
 
Edison Carasio said:
It's trump's real account. We are being facetious; appealing to the humor of a president being a living caricature of himself.
Click to expand...
xcvbn said:


Pretty sure courts don't take guilty pleas just for the fuck of it, so yeah, it's a crime you dildo.
Click to expand...


@SBJJ must be Trump's sherdog account.

"His guilty plea isnt for crimes! That's not a crime!"
<Kpop775>
 
Last edited:
waiguoren said:
Matt Schlapp lays the Schlappdown on menopausal CNN anchor. This one is like an 18-wheeler rolling over Bambi.



Camerota: Does it affect your support of Donald Trump?

Schlapp: The fact that Michael Cohen plead guilty to these charges? Not at all. Cohen is someone, like Paul Manafort, who had an elaborate scheme to not pay his taxes and committed a lot of financial crimes. In Cohen's case, because they had him over a barrel---because they had all these crimes that they could prosecute him for---they got him to sign a plea that was not negotiated. It was "take it or leave it". He signed it to save his own hide and to try to get a reduced sentence. It happens all the time in America.

Camerota: So just to be clear, Matt: you don't believe that President Trump directed him to make those payments to those two women and that it was to influence the presidential race?

Schlapp: All I can tell you is, Cohen taped all of or at least a lot of his conversation with the president, so if Cohen has some kind of proof that happened, we'll see it. I don't believe that proof exists. I think what happened is: Michael Cohen plead to charges that are actually not crimes according to the FEC, but that are an attempt to do anything to connect Cohen's wrongdoing to potential wrongdoing with Trump, andI think that's a travesty.

Camerota: Obviously, there are campaign finance laws and you're not allowed to make payments to mislead the American voter into voting for you. Number two, when you say there's no evidence, when you testify under oath, he did so in an open court. There are wire transfers, according to prosecutors, that show the money going from Michael Cohen and that money going to a porn actress and a Playboy model.

Schlapp: Right.

Camerota: There are the stories of the two women who say that they had affairs with Mr. Trump. You don't believe any of that?

Schlapp: What I'm answering your question on is, I don't believe that the transactions associated with these two people are FEC crimes. I believe that Michael Cohen plead guilty to actions that are called "crimes" in the plea deal that aren't actually crimes. Allison, can you name any other person in this country who has been convicted of trying to squelch a story in the National Enquirier? Name the names.

Camerota: What I think you're doing, is a lot of sort of fancy rhetorical footwork...

Schlapp: No, I'm answering your question.

Camerota: Well my question to you was, does it at all affect your support of Donald Trump to know all these things?

Schlapp: What, the fact that Donald Trump had an extravagant lifestyle?

Camerota: And may have had affairs with these two women he paid off in hush money.

Schlapp: I grew up outside of New York City for a number of years. I read all about Donald Trump. Nobody in my party and nobody of the folks that made up the Trump coalition were naive to the fact that the life that he had...

Camerota: So you were okay with those things.

Schlapp: No, I never said I was okay....

Camerota: Well, look! You support him, okay?

Schlapp: I support him strongly.

Camerota: So at some point, we have to connect the dots. You support him strongly. So at some point we have to...

Schlapp: Look, Allison, Allison, let me...I would like a minute here.

.....

It continues like this for four more minutes. This one is like Sullivan v. Araujo. Hard to watch the beatdown.
Click to expand...

<Dany07>

"There could be evidence, but we haven't seen it yet."

That's the best you got? Such a smack down.
 
waiguoren said:
Matt Schlapp lays the Schlappdown on menopausal CNN anchor. This one is like an 18-wheeler rolling over Bambi.



Camerota: Does it affect your support of Donald Trump?

Schlapp: The fact that Michael Cohen plead guilty to these charges? Not at all. Cohen is someone, like Paul Manafort, who had an elaborate scheme to not pay his taxes and committed a lot of financial crimes. In Cohen's case, because they had him over a barrel---because they had all these crimes that they could prosecute him for---they got him to sign a plea that was not negotiated. It was "take it or leave it". He signed it to save his own hide and to try to get a reduced sentence. It happens all the time in America.

Camerota: So just to be clear, Matt: you don't believe that President Trump directed him to make those payments to those two women and that it was to influence the presidential race?

Schlapp: All I can tell you is, Cohen taped all of or at least a lot of his conversation with the president, so if Cohen has some kind of proof that happened, we'll see it. I don't believe that proof exists. I think what happened is: Michael Cohen plead to charges that are actually not crimes according to the FEC, but that are an attempt to do anything to connect Cohen's wrongdoing to potential wrongdoing with Trump, andI think that's a travesty.

Camerota: Obviously, there are campaign finance laws and you're not allowed to make payments to mislead the American voter into voting for you. Number two, when you say there's no evidence, when you testify under oath, he did so in an open court. There are wire transfers, according to prosecutors, that show the money going from Michael Cohen and that money going to a porn actress and a Playboy model.

Schlapp: Right.

Camerota: There are the stories of the two women who say that they had affairs with Mr. Trump. You don't believe any of that?

Schlapp: What I'm answering your question on is, I don't believe that the transactions associated with these two people are FEC crimes. I believe that Michael Cohen plead guilty to actions that are called "crimes" in the plea deal that aren't actually crimes. Allison, can you name any other person in this country who has been convicted of trying to squelch a story in the National Enquirier? Name the names.

Camerota: What I think you're doing, is a lot of sort of fancy rhetorical footwork...

Schlapp: No, I'm answering your question.

Camerota: Well my question to you was, does it at all affect your support of Donald Trump to know all these things?

Schlapp: What, the fact that Donald Trump had an extravagant lifestyle?

Camerota: And may have had affairs with these two women he paid off in hush money.

Schlapp: I grew up outside of New York City for a number of years. I read all about Donald Trump. Nobody in my party and nobody of the folks that made up the Trump coalition were naive to the fact that the life that he had...

Camerota: So you were okay with those things.

Schlapp: No, I never said I was okay....

Camerota: Well, look! You support him, okay?

Schlapp: I support him strongly.

Camerota: So at some point, we have to connect the dots. You support him strongly. So at some point we have to...

Schlapp: Look, Allison, Allison, let me...I would like a minute here.

.....

It continues like this for four more minutes. This one is like Sullivan v. Araujo. Hard to watch the beatdown.
Click to expand...

I only read the transcript, but desperately avoiding answering a question isn't a beatdown by any measure
 
Edison Carasio said:
@SBJJ must he Trump's sherdog account.

"His guilty plea isnt for crimes! That's not a crime!"
<Kpop775>
Click to expand...

Alan D seems to agree with me. It’s just over your head.

If I plead guilty to manslaughter that does not mean every person charged with manslaughter after is guilty

Again. The Former head of the FEC has stated these payments did not violate campaign laws
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,103
Messages
57,968,252
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top