Not Just a Cohencidence (Mueller/Investigation Thread v.20)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cohen has been charged with "campaign finance violations" so that implicates Trump as there's enough evidence to prove Trump had knowledge of the payments.

<mma4>

And Cohen says he is willing to testify against Trump and even calls him corrupt and criminal.

<mma4>
 
Quequeg said:
Where is Bobby?
Click to expand...
He's trying to figure out a way to convince himself (not us, because that's not happening) that he is somehow still right after being proved completely and totally wrong.
Right, @bobgeese ?
How's that "Cohen didn't flip" delusion coming along? Congrats. You may have succeeded in convincing people you're crazy and not just stupid.
 
Only the best.

The First 2 Congressmen To Endorse Trump Have Been Indicted
Reps. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) and Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) are now in hot water over allegations of insider trading and campaign finance violations.
 
Edison Carasio said:
The lack of the lionel hutz emoji in this thread is disturbing. Yall slippin

<NotListening>




Trump admits sexual assault on tape. Trumptards say "no he didn't".

Trump admits to obstruction of justice by firing Comey to stop the investigation. Trumptards say "no he didn't".

Trump appeals to Russia to hack his political opponent. Trumptards say "No he didn't."

Trump suggests his supporters should assassinate his opponent. Trumptards suggest "no he didn't"

I think we are seeing a trend here, just maybe.
Click to expand...
The "What he meant to say was..." presidency
 
Trump did not collude with Russia.

If there was even a shred of that evidence it would have came out long before.

What I'm supposed to believe, the federal government has proof Trump colluded (and if so, he would be a liabilty without a doubt.)
and had left him in office 2 years.

To me.... that is unbelievable.

And I hope Manafort and Cohen spend time in the clink, tax evading scum buckets if you ask me.

The only thing that matters to most Republicans is the Russia collusion, not payments to a whore.
 
Factory said:
I doubt that

But my main point is, that the left is trying to elevate this into an impeachable offense and not the Russian collusion.
Click to expand...

Maybe it's possible that noted crime enthusiast Donald Trump did some Russia crimes and a bunch of other crimes too?
 
This is so good

MIp6KH.gif
 
Mark Hunts FIST said:
Trump did not collude with Russia.

If there was even a shred of that evidence it would have came out long before.

What I'm supposed to believe, the federal government has proof Trump colluded (and if so, he would be a liabilty without a doubt.)
and had left him in office 2 years.

To me.... that is unbelievable.

And I hope Manafort and Cohen spend time in the clink, tax evading scum buckets if you ask me.

The only thing that matters to most Republicans is the Russia collusion, not payments to a whore.
Click to expand...
I can smell the desperation in this post from here
 
This is what the Trump Lickspittles look like this morning.
giphy.gif
 
Factory said:
But the payment wasn't related to the campaign, according to his team.

And even if? so fuking what? We talk here about sex with a whore which happened 10 years ago :/

QUESTION: WHERE IS TRUMP RUSSIAN COLLUSION????

Remember? It started with Russia collusion? They couldn't find anything...
Then obstruction... They couldn't find anything...
Now we are here talking about a whore.

Prime example of lets not investigate the specific crime, lets investigate the case "we have to find something"

And Cohens part? He would say anything at this point just to improve his situation.
Click to expand...

Actually, it all started because Trump fired Comey because he was looking into Russian efforts during the 2016 election.

The investigation is the result of Trump's actions and behavior.
 
Mark Hunts FIST said:
Trump did not collude with Russia.

If there was even a shred of that evidence it would have came out long before.

What I'm supposed to believe, the federal government has proof Trump colluded (and if so, he would be a liabilty without a doubt.)
and had left him in office 2 years.

To me.... that is unbelievable.

And I hope Manafort and Cohen spend time in the clink, tax evading scum buckets if you ask me.

The only thing that matters to most Republicans is the Russia collusion, not payments to a whore.
Click to expand...

Evidence like his son, son in law and campaign manager meeting with Russian operatives?

His son asking for Russian dirt on Hillary in e-mails?

Trump asking for them to release dirt on Hillary on national television and Russia doing it?

The GOP changing their platform in regards to Russian and Ukrainian relations when Trump became the head of the ticket?
 
Factory said:
But the payment wasn't related to the campaign, according to his team.

And even if? so fuking what? We talk here about sex with a whore which happened 10 years ago :/

QUESTION: WHERE IS TRUMP RUSSIAN COLLUSION????

Remember? It started with Russia collusion? They couldn't find anything...
Then obstruction... They couldn't find anything...
Now we are here talking about a whore.

Prime example of lets not investigate the specific crime, lets investigate the case "we have to find something"

And Cohens part? He would say anything at this point just to improve his situation.
Click to expand...

1 - If the payment was related to the campaign then it is illegal. I don't write the laws. Congress does and the Republicans have held office several times since these laws were enacted and have not seen fit to change them. Weed laws are also dumb but they are what they are. Cohen has admitted that what he did was illegal. The remaining question is whether Trump was involved in a way that made him similarly liable.

2. - I've not seen any direct evidence of collusion. We'll have to wait for the Mueller report.

3 - The issue isn't whether Trump had sex with a prostitute, the issue is whether he broke the law during the campaign in order to cover it up. That's how these investigations go. Remember Clinton and Monica Lewinsky? That investigation started several years earlier as an investigation into a real-estate deal Clinton was involved in as Governor of Arkansas and also a harassment claim by Paula Jones from before Clinton was President. Republicans voted to impeach Clinton on Perjury and Obstruction of Justice, the things that Trump is being investigated for as well, even though neither investigation started with that in mind. That's how these things go.

4- Investigators should uncover and prosecute anything they come across. If cops stop you for speeding and see weed in your car you are going to get busted for both. If you business is investigated for screwing the government on contracts but they uncover tax fraud you are going to get charged for both.

5. - The post I responded to said that Trump did not know about the payments before the election. He did and he lied about.
 
Last edited:
Rational Poster said:
Actually, it all started because Trump fired Comey because he was looking into Russian efforts during the 2016 election.

The investigation is the result of Trump's actions and behavior.
Click to expand...
No, no. This is everybody's fault BUT stupid idiot Donny Moscow.
 
PolishHeadlock said:
Evidence like his son, son in law and campaign manager meeting with Russian operatives?

His son asking for Russian dirt on Hillary in e-mails?

Trump asking for them to release dirt on Hillary on national television and Russia doing it?

The GOP changing their platform in regards to Russian and Ukrainian relations when Trump became the head of the ticket?
Click to expand...

The weird thing is that it's so out in the open. Like if we didn't hear all that stuff, and then it all came down at once, it would be impossible to defend. But since it's been trickling out, people kind of forget about it amid all the other findings of corruption.

And side note: There is just a ridiculous amount of bad faith in Trump's apologists here. Everyone on both sides (many sides) knows that if this were Clinton, she'd have been impeached long ago with the enthusiastic support of the people who keep saying that every finding is no big deal.
 
Mark Hunts FIST said:
Trump did not collude with Russia.

If there was even a shred of that evidence it would have came out long before.

What I'm supposed to believe, the federal government has proof Trump colluded (and if so, he would be a liabilty without a doubt.)
and had left him in office 2 years.

To me.... that is unbelievable.

And I hope Manafort and Cohen spend time in the clink, tax evading scum buckets if you ask me.

The only thing that matters to most Republicans is the Russia collusion, not payments to a whore.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,181
Messages
57,972,968
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top