Opinion Nick Fuentes

[DoctorTaco]

Of course because he advocated violence on violence. If it was his property then he can defend it imo. He obviously was prepared for it and by all accounts he was attacked which is why he got off. I get the sentiment of his statement. Destroying people's lives in their small business because you are upset is terrible and those people are bottom of the barrel trash. But if we dish out violence according our individual feelings this where it gets you. Same with the peeps showing up at nicks house (one with gun and crossbow).

Correct. He got what was coming to him. it wasn’t his property. He and the people he fought with were all defending themselves, that’s why they all got off.

Yes, it’s terrible to destroy a small business when you’re upset. No one is arguing otherwise.

I’m not advocating violence based on feelings. I’m advocating violence towards those who advocate violence towards others.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Oh yea. And losing it was a drama filled adventure that got me in quite a bit of trouble.

The real short version is i lost it to a chick that wasn't my girlfriend who would go on to become my wife. Shell laugh about it now but man she was pissed off then.

And now that same woman who always wore my jackets and hoodies won't wear my hoodies any more unless she's absolutely dying of the cold. Used to be punk ska. Now it's oi and guns.

as punks age we either go skin or rockabilly, lol.

 

[Gutter Chris]

as punks age we either go skin or rockabilly, lol.

I kinda went both as well as like gems on vhs indie country.

The 2 groups I love to point out to my wife when we are out and about are once were punks and guys I'm fairly sure are on team carry a gun everywhere you go.

I also think about the quote die a hero or live long enough to become the villain a lot. Now I'm a cranky conservative middle aged man with a big white beard and try like mad to avoid discussing politics when outside smoking at a show.

 

[Cajun]

Correct. He got what was coming to him. it wasn’t his property. He and the people he fought with were all defending themselves, that’s why they all got off.

Yes, it’s terrible to destroy a small business when you’re upset. No one is arguing otherwise.

I’m not advocating violence based on feelings. I’m advocating violence towards those who advocate violence towards others.

They were in the same boat. You're talking about midnight when everybody's asleep. What are you protesting at that hour? Like I said... Plenty have advocated violence so there would be many on the right and left dead or beaten at this point. Assaulting someone for words or killing them is nonsense and ultimately it is the basis for lots of violence but nonsense.

 

[gatchaman]

I've legit never listened to the guy before this thread, but to say Destiny failed to deliver a victory in this video is an understatement for the ages.

Who is more popular, Destiny or Nick Fuentes? Who is spawning imitators around the world, Destiny or Nick Fuentes? Here, Portuguese Nick Fuentes attacks British Nick Fuentes over irreverence to original great American Nick Fuentes:


Destiny did not look good trying to shout over Nick Fuentes when Nick Fuentes was speaking. Here is a more respectful debate between Nick Fuentes and Dinesh D'Souza:

I think that Nick Fuentes has effectively painted the bombing of Iran as Trump being taken over by the Bush era neocons. As political strategy, the left should be happy for Nick Fuentes because he is dividing the right. The right should be happy because the definition of neoconservatism (a liberal who has been mugged by reality) implies that the left has successfully infiltrated the right (Nick Fuentes's definition of neoconservatism is: Ethnonationalism for Israel and DEI communism for every other country).

 

[DoctorTaco]

They were in the same boat. You're talking about midnight when everybody's asleep. What are you protesting at that hour? Like I said... Plenty have advocated violence so there would be many on the right and left dead or beaten at this point. Assaulting someone for words or killing them is nonsense and ultimately it is the basis for lots of violence but nonsense.

Protesting and looting isn’t the same thing as physically harming others or advocating for their physical harm.

I don’t care which side of the isle they land on. If they advocate for violence they should be prepared for violence.

If someone stood in front of you and your family and told you they were going to harm your family- if someone got onto a social media platform and told millions of listeners to harm your family and you had the opportunity to knock their teeth down their throat, do you believe that you wouldn’t because those are “just words”?

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

You guys sure do obsess over a bunch of irrelevant internet weirdos.

 

[Cajun]

Protesting and looting isn’t the same thing as physically harming others or advocating for their physical harm.

I don’t care which side of the isle they land on. If they advocate for violence they should be prepared for violence.

If someone stood in front of you and your family and told you they were going to harm your family- if someone got onto a social media platform and told millions of listeners to harm your family and you had the opportunity to knock their teeth down their throat, do you believe that you wouldn’t because those are “just words”?

Now you're saying words are worse than actual destruction of people's livelihoods. I guess it would depend on who it was yelling in my face. If you're talking about one of those lefties that are yelling at Christians and things like that right in their face that don't really pose a threat? Then no. If it was somebody that could really challenge me I might take a swing. But that's more because it's someone that can challenge me.
Did you know there are black nationalists that advocate my harm as a white person. But if you sent me in a room with them I would probably try to talk to them versus just beat them up. You are usually the more level-headed one of the two of us.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Now you're saying words are worse than actual destruction of people's livelihoods. I guess it would depend on who it was yelling in my face. If you're talking about one of those lefties that are yelling at Christians and things like that right in their face that don't really pose a threat? Then no. If it was somebody that could really challenge me I might take a swing. But that's more because it's someone that can challenge me.
Did you know there are black nationalists that advocate my harm as a white person. But if you sent me in a room with them I would probably try to talk to them versus just beat them up. You are usually the more level-headed one of the two of us.

Yes. If somebody’s direct call for violence leads to an actual person being physically assaulted then that would be worse than a business being destroyed. People’s lives are more important than items on a shelf.

If a black nationalist advocates for violence then they should be prepared to deal with violence. Not sure what race has to do with it.

If somebody uses their words to pose as credible threat to your family, you would be violent towards them, and good for you on that.

 

[Loiosh]

Kyle and others believe thats what the protesters were doing. I brought it up but not that I'm trying to justify Kyle doing what he did so I didn't want to talk too much about him in particular. Just the sentiment

Weird that I'm more pro-Rittenhouse than you.

As much as I hate the laws that allowed him to bring a rifle to a riot, they exist and he did absolutely nothing in that altercation but defend himself. What's more he showed extraordinary discipline and only fired when absolutely necessary.

One lunatic tried to kill him and was shot. Others mistakenly thought Rittenhouse was a mass shooter and tried to take him out, and only got shot when Rittenhouse had no other choice.

 

[LeonardoBjj]

- I've seen that name droped a lot. Always thought it's was some fighter.

 

[Cajun]

Weird that I'm more pro-Rittenhouse than you.

As much as I hate the laws that allowed him to bring a rifle to a riot, they exist and he did absolutely nothing in that altercation but defend himself. What's more he showed extraordinary discipline and only fired when absolutely necessary.

One lunatic tried to kill him and was shot. Others mistakenly thought Rittenhouse was a mass shooter and tried to take him out, and only got shot when Rittenhouse had no other choice.

Overall if it's not your property I don't believe in just going places and waiting for trouble. Especially during a protest. That should be the police job to decide in those instances. I'm for the second amendment in the right to protect yourself or your property. But you just go over and do that I didn't agree. Because they did attack him he got acquitted which I'm okay with. But ultimately I don't feel he was right and just going there expecting violence

 

[Cajun]

Yes. If somebody’s direct call for violence leads to an actual person being physically assaulted then that would be worse than a business being destroyed. People’s lives are more important than items on a shelf.

If a black nationalist advocates for violence then they should be prepared to deal with violence. Not sure what race has to do with it.

If somebody uses their words to pose as credible threat to your family, you would be violent towards them, and good for you on that.

Again only if they are real threat physically. I never just beat up people in my life for doing that especially if I deem them weaker than me. And we don't know if the call for violence has done anything. You're making assumptions now. But someone going bankrupt over their business getting destroyed is not something that vastly different. I'm good with agreeing to disagree here because we just keep going back and forth. But destroying someone's livelihood is not much different. I would rather someone assault me then burn down my house if I didn't have insurance. Also when any peaceful protest turns violent you advocate killing them or beating the hell outta them.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Again only if they are real threat physically

Ok, so on this we agree. If someone’s words could lead to violence then that person should expect violence in return.

we don't know if the call for violence has done anything.

If you call for violence, expect violence. No assumptions needed.

I would rather someone assault me then burn down my house if I didn't have insurance.

Would you rather someone assault your family or burn down your house? Assault your neighbor or burn down your house?

Also when any peaceful protest turns violent you advocate killing them or beating the hell outta them.

If someone in a protest is calling for or perpetuating violence then that person should be prepared first violence to be visited upon them.

 

[Loiosh]

Overall if it's not your property I don't believe in just going places and waiting for trouble. Especially during a protest. That should be the police job to decide in those instances. I'm for the second amendment in the right to protect yourself or your property. But you just go over and do that I didn't agree. Because they did attack him he got acquitted which I'm okay with. But ultimately I don't feel he was right and just going there expecting violence

I agree with all of that but I'm being open-minded here.

I've said before that liberals have never supported destruction and looting and I meant it. I have no idea what was really going on there but if businesses were being destroyed and police were doing nothing, the idea of someone defending their livelihood seems to be not only reasonable but expected to me.

 

[Cajun]

I agree with all of that but I'm being open-minded here.

I've said before that liberals have never supported destruction and looting and I meant it. I have no idea what was really going on there but if businesses were being destroyed and police were doing nothing, the idea of someone defending their livelihood seems to be not only reasonable but expected to me.

Agreed. Defending someone else's I have some issue but yeah. If I own a small store then Im defending. It is literally someone's livelihood at times and its not nothing.

 

[Cajun]

Ok, so on this we agree. If someone’s words could lead to violence then that person should expect violence in return.

But not some pink haired woman or weak dude. Maybe they should but Im gonna leave it.

If you call for violence, expect violence. No assumptions needed.

Ok

Would you rather someone assault your family or burn down your house? Assault your neighbor or burn down your house?

Burn down my business I spent years on and can be lost? Maybe not family but me..

If someone in a protest is calling for or perpetuating violence then that person should be prepared first violence to be visited upon them.

Saw there was a trans UK activist saying this... I wouldn't walk up and knock her teeth out. Just saying..

 

[WklySportsMemes]

You guys sure do obsess over a bunch of irrelevant internet weirdos.

Doesn't your life & identity revolve around crying about mentally ill people with purple hair in pink hats voicing their opinion? Or changing your name to worship hack online & television personalities ?

Lol yeah "obsessed"

 

[DoctorTaco]

But not some pink haired woman or weak dude. Maybe they should but Im gonna leave it.

If that weak dude or pink haired woman is advocating violence then they should be prepared for violence.

Burn down my business I spent years on and can be lost? Maybe not family

We can agree then that people’s lives and well being are more important than material things.

Saw there was a trans UK activist saying this...

That person should be prepared for violence.

I wouldn't walk up and knock her teeth out. Just saying..

I’m not taking about personal actions, I’m talking about expectations.

If I walk around with water balloons and threaten to throw them at people then I should be ok with getting wet. If I tell millions of people to turn on their hose and to spray folks walking by then I should be prepared to get wet.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

Chickens coming home to roost, right?

Exactly. Its insane the level that some people will go to now a days to defend a literal Hitler fan girl that deserves all the social consequences that fall onto their doorstep. Just because they are being pushed online or by the algorithms.

The crazy arc that I dont understand is the one the progressive left is playing with trying to make people like Fuentes or MTG sanitized because they are calling out Trump now. WTF. Like these morons help put this tard in power again, they only are turning on him because hes not antisemitic enough for their liking and that hes a schill for Israel too. Rats fleeing from a sinking ship. But you see a lot of the left propping these 2 out on social media trying to make it seem like they are the voices of reason on anything. Its disgusting.