I actually find him entertaining and charismatic but the guy is clearly insane now from all the stigmatization and conflicts he has to deal with on a daily basis.
The problem is who decides who deserves violence against them. Plenty of anti-jewish Muslims and black nationalist groups. Target them for violence? Maybe the idea that words ARE violence to some on the left gives them justification in their own minds to hurt or kill.The Paradox of Tolerance comes to mind here. Violence should be the last resort to dealing with his ilk, sure, but any opposition I have to violence against fascists is strategic, not moral. Nothing is off the table when it comes to silencing these cretins.
He is growing in influence despite being kicked off most platforms.
How about a “live by the sword, die by the sword” rule? If you advocate for violence against others you should be prepared for violence to be perpetrated against yourself.The problem is who decides who deserves violence against them. Plenty of anti-jewish Muslims and black nationalist groups. Target them for violence? Maybe the idea that words ARE violence to some on the left gives them justification in their own minds to hurt or kill.
Chickens coming home to roost, right?How about a “live by the sword, die by the sword” rule? If you advocate for violence against others you should be prepared for violence to be perpetrated against yourself.
Feels fair.
Fascist swine. I wish that he'd shut the fuck up and follow his leader already
![]()
How about a “live by the sword, die by the sword” rule? If you advocate for violence against others you should be prepared for violence to be perpetrated against yourself.
Feels fair.
The winner has nothing to do with whats fair, imo.Is it still fair if he wins the confrontation? Or is it only fair if the offended party wins?
Feels but isn't. So many would die haha. Live and die by the sword is actual murder.... not racism etc. Again... where does it end? Not that I care about this dude. But to say people should be killed for saying words is a bit much. There are plenty of black nationalists that hate me because of my skin color. I dont wish death on them all or ask peeps to find them and attack them and their families. Again, who gets to decide what speech deserves violence or death.How about a “live by the sword, die by the sword” rule? If you advocate for violence against others you should be prepared for violence to be perpetrated against yourself.
Feels fair.
That’s not what I said-Feels but isn't. So many would die haha. Live and die by the sword is actual murder.... not racism etc. Again... where does it end? Not that I care about this dude. But to say people should be killed for saying words is a bit much. There are plenty of black nationalists that hate me because of my skin color. I dont wish death on them all or ask peeps to find them and attack them and their families. Again, who gets to decide what speech deserves violence or death.
So far, Destiny has been the only significant left-wing social media guy to attempt to debate Fuentes, and Destiny failed to deliver a victory in the arena of ideas.
And now, Fuentes has been doxxed and homicide attempted.
Do you think more could be done, in terms of debate, before resorting to violence? Fuentes is receptive to debate.
I used to have that patch on an old battle jacket. Next to it was the Dead Kennedys logo patchWhat band patch was that closest to on your jacket
I was gonna guess DK or bad religionI used to have that patch on an old battle jacket. Next to it was the Dead Kennedys logo patch
I get the poetic justice side but I dont approve in practice. That stupid kid Kyle Rittenhouse likely had the same opinion as did some of those who supported him. Again I get the sentiment. I dont know a lot about this guy or what hes said but I would rather talk and get to know a black nationalist that calls for revolution and violence to change his mind rather than want him and his family terrorized.That’s not what I said-
If you advocate for physical violence against others, if you advocate for using violence against others to obtain your goals then you should be prepared for the same level of violence to be perpetrated against you.
If I say, “anyone who has their t-shirt bottom hanging out from their sweatshirt should be punched in the teeth until they tuck that shit in” then I should be prepared for someone to punch me in the mouth for my own position and stance on the issue.
If I say, “people who have their shirts hanging out from their hoody’s are loathsome, vile creatures worthy of contempt and nothing more” then I shouldn’t be punched in the mouth for my statement.
Yeah?
And who decides who wins? Debates are many times very subjective. Being a hateful bitch is what it is. Win or lose (whatever that means) is irrelevant.The winner has nothing to do with whats fair, imo.