Opinion Nick Fuentes

[Cajun]

If that weak dude or pink haired woman is advocating violence then they should be prepared for violence.

I've watched a lot of videos of men crushing women. Not right imo

We can agree then that people’s lives and well being are more important than material things.

It is. But if it puts me and my family under? Youre gonna get some.

That person should be prepared for violence.

Fair but I dont want her teeth knocked out for words imo

I’m not taking about personal actions, I’m talking about expectations.

Sure but in this forum you are somewhat complicit with that idea.

If I walk around with water balloons and threaten to throw them at people then I should be ok with getting wet. If I tell millions of people to turn on their hose and to spray folks walking by then I should be prepared to get wet.

Ok

 

[DoctorTaco]

I've watched a lot of videos of men crushing women. Not right imo

I didn’t bring gender into it.

Fair but I dont want her teeth knocked out for words imo

You said you’d physically assault someone for their words if they were making credible threats to your family. What makes someone else’s family less worthy of that same protection?

Sure but in this forum you are somewhat complicit with that idea.

I don’t follow

 

[Cajun]

I didn’t bring gender into it.

You generalized


You said you’d physically assault someone for their words if they were making credible threats to your family. What makes someone else’s family less worthy of that same protection?
that's my ego

I don’t follow

Ok

 

[DoctorTaco]

You generalized

Sure. If a woman calls for violence then she should expect violence. The math is mathing.

 

[Cajun]

Sure. If a woman calls for violence then she should expect violence. The math is mathing.

So im going to beat up a woman then? You've lost me bud. I grew up not hitting women. I know thats changing and men tend to treat women like other men but nah. Cheers.

 

[Cajun]

I didn’t bring gender into it.


You said you’d physically assault someone for their words if they were making credible threats to your family. What makes someone else’s family less worthy of that same protection?

Not even credible threats. The man in me doesnt like to be challenged by equal or perceived superiority. If somebody is formidable then its more about competition but Id still be wrong. Just being honest. Id never crush someone weaker just for words. Youre thinking eliminates many by force because thats your feeling. Its still not right to beat up others of a bad opinion or wish death. Its the same reason you see this younger generation knock the crap outta women in these clips because they hit first. Most are like fighting a 12 yr old boy. Yet this generation justifies it by saying they should not hit. But its not even comparable levels. You guys that think this way are lost bud.

I don’t follow

 

[bandicoot]

"Well shucks I don't know much of anything about what this thread is about, but I'll go on for 5 pages anyway."
- @Cajun

 

[Cajun]

"Well shucks I don't know much of anything about what this thread is about, but I'll go on for 5 pages anyway."
- @Cajun

Glad I have you to remind me of my purpose around here.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

it feels like i'm one of the few around here that has not watched this guy. i see his face often on X but it's only in mocking posts, so i imagined he's some douche. i think i heard about him on sherdog too, just like i did about tate. very strange people. i'm surprised people pay them attention, but i was also surprised about rogan, so i guess i have a zeitgeist blindspot.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Not even credible threats. The man in me doesnt like to be challenged by equal or perceived superiority. If somebody is formidable then its more about competition but Id still be wrong. Just being honest. Id never crush someone weaker just for words. Youre thinking eliminates many by force because thats your feeling. Its still not right to beat up others of a bad opinion or wish death. Its the same reason you see this younger generation knock the crap outta women in these clips because they hit first. Most are like fighting a 12 yr old boy. Yet this generation justifies it by saying they should not hit. But its not even comparable levels. You guys that think this way are lost bud.

If you call for violence, expect it. It doesn’t get much simpler.

You keep interjecting yourself personally into this philosophical idea. I’m not stating whom to expect the violence from or to what degree, that part is all you. Right or wrong you’re admitted that you’d hit someone for their words if you deemed it a credible threat to someone you care about who’s big enough to give you a good fight.

 

[DoctorTaco]

So im going to beat up a woman then? You've lost me bud. I grew up not hitting women. I know thats changing and men tend to treat women like other men but nah. Cheers.

When did I say you’re going to beat up a woman?

 

[Cajun]

If you call for violence, expect it. It doesn’t get much simpler.

You keep interjecting yourself personally into this philosophical idea. I’m not stating whom to expect the violence from or to what degree, that part is all you. Right or wrong you’re admitted that you’d hit someone for their words if you deemed it a credible threat to someone you care about who’s big enough to give you a good fight.

You asked me personally how Id feel. And yeah I said I might but doesnt make me right. I may do the same in a number of circumstances that dont call for it. Id likely fight for insults haha though Im getting too old for that nonsense... Anyway, we've beaten this dead horse into dust. We can move on. I think that you are of the opinion that words = violence which is a strong left position. I dont. But we're good.

 

[DoctorTaco]

You asked me personally how Id feel. And yeah I said I might but doesnt make me right. I may do the same in a number of circumstances that dont call for it. Id likely fight for insults haha though Im getting too old for that nonsense... Anyway, we've beaten this dead horse into dust. We can move on. I think that you are of the opinion that words = violence which is a strong left position. I dont. But we're good.

I didn’t say either thing. You’re free to stop responding anytime though, no need to announce it bud.

I’m of the opinion that if you call for violence against others, you should be prepared for violence against yourself.

 

[Cajun]

I didn’t say either thing. You’re free to stop responding anytime though, no need to announce it bud.

I’m of the opinion that if you call for violence against others, you should be prepared for violence against yourself.

Cheers

 

[WklySportsMemes]

"Well shucks I don't know much of anything about what this thread is about, but I'll go on for 5 pages anyway."
- @Cajun

Bingo. Nailed it. Never seen somebody always self declaring "i dont follow or know about this issue or person" then take such hardline stances on being right or running defense for literal garbage concepts & garbage people for pages. Its the world according to his limited anecdotal experience or simplistic view, everything else he considers made up.

Then its crazy because you can get educated ITT on exactly who or what somebody is in seconds from credible quotes, links, articles, or hell just a simple Google search. But nah he just always plugs his ears and doubles down hiding behind the uniformed both sides centrist card while clearly advocating or defending shit tier people.

Then the absolute cherry on top Is when people call him out on not answering direct questions, introducing random things to distract from being wrong, or repeating the same debunked talking points he gets super passive aggressive and tries to demand people stop talking to him in a fake nice guy persona.