Social Nick Fuentes is getting way too popular

[Possum Jenkins]

Help us defeat the boomer paleoconservatives, then together we can dethrone the Jews and free Palestine.

Freeing Palestine is the only thing here that I agree with. Not falling for it tho.

You old school WNs only care about Palestine as a way to shit on Jews. We all know what you think about Muslims in general...

 

[gatchaman]

I just listened to the first half that I missed.

Damn, Piers was really flubbing it by deliberately refusing to talk about per capita numbers and he played dumb. Stuff like that will give Fuentes ammunition.

Still funny though good Christian Piers mocking Fuentes for not fornicating enough.

Also, the bit where Fuentes says at least 6 million died in the holocaust, maybe 100 times more than that --> that's some peak Norm MacDonald trolling

Piers Morgan fell for the hype that he needed to challenge Nick Fuentes in a debate instead of understand Nick Fuentes in an interview.

Piers Morgan would only acknowledge that 1/100 black males have committed murder to contrast it to Fuentes's number of 5/100 (Both estimates seem high to me). Morgan went on to state that white mass school shooters outnumber black mass school shooters as if this is all the information you need to have when choosing where to sit on a bus. When pressed about proportions Morgan would only acknowledge that the same proportion of whites and blacks are mass school shooters, but any astute person knows that the chance of the person on the bus or even at your school being a mass school shooter is 1/millions. A more relevant comparison is 1/100 black-males-are-murderers compared to ?/100 white-males-are-murderers.

Piers Morgan would not provide any statistics when pressed by Fuentes because Morgan was focused on winning a debate instead understanding the interviewee, and so Morgan would not provide any ammo to Fuentes. Somewhat related, I think this is why Candace Owens would prefer a video call to a live appearance with TPUSA, so that her team can feed her information offscreen, a strategy that Fuentes did not seem to employ.


On the Holocaust, Nick Fuentes made the point that the number is less important than whether it is legal to debate the number.

Piers Morgan countered the legality of the debate is irrelevant because any number below 6 million is just wrong. Before discussing the Holocaust, Nick Fuentes and Piers Morgan discussed the concept of world Jewry. Nick Fuentes argued that there is transnational Jewish political organization (such as the World Jewish Congress), and the astute viewer can figure out that the illegality of Holocaust debate in multiple countries stems from the political advocacy of world Jewry.

I think that this is a win for Fuentes because it highlights the effectiveness of world Jewry political activity as something to be noticed as more than just a conspiracy theory. In addition, there is the slippery slope argument. Morgan has conceded that it is better to debate Fuentes than to attempt to cancel him, so the same rules should apply to Holocaust debate. On the slippery slope, people are cancelled for citing inconvenient but accurate racial crime statistics.

 

[gatchaman]

Thanks for posting this. I didn't know when the debate would be, so I was unable to watch it live. Apparently, 20 minutes are edited out of the replay. Would anyone post the missing 20 minutes? Thanks in advance.

 

[Spam On Rye]

Easy win for the gay zoomer. The feigned moral outrage from the neocon boomers and liberals don't work anymore.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Easy win for the gay zoomer. The feigned moral outrage from the neocon boomers and liberals don't work anymore.

It will against anyone like Fuentes. It is electoral poison.

 

[MDoza]

Damn, Piers pivoted so hard when Fuentes pointed out that Israel shares his views on maintaining their demographics, and how in the UK and US whites will soon be a minority.

Despite trying to label him as everything bad, he made Fuentes seem entertaining, funny, and good spirited.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Damn, Piers pivoted so hard when Fuentes pointed out that Israel shares his views on maintaining their demographics, and how in the UK and US whites will soon be a minority.

Despite trying to label him as everything bad, he made Fuentes seem entertaining, funny, and good spirited.

Asians and hispanics might start identifying as white. White devil magic.

 

[ShadowRun]

Obvious he pays for botnet services

 

[KaNesDeath]

Damn, Piers pivoted so hard when Fuentes pointed out that Israel shares his views on maintaining their demographics, and how in the UK and US whites will soon be a minority.

Despite trying to label him as everything bad, he made Fuentes seem entertaining, funny, and good spirited.

Confrontational(dickhead) Piers is no longer a thing. He plays moderator now to online political influencers so they can bicker amongst themselves.

Basically bringing the wasted air that is the online influencer debate sphere to TV.

 

[gatchaman]

Obvious he pays for botnet services

Nick Fuentes is bot-supported, because his ratio of retweets to followers is greater than Destiny, Ian Carroll, Hassan Piker, and Elon Musk; because bots are capable of retweeting but incapable of following?

That's how it works according to the NCRI, the same organization which claims that "Christ is King" is antisemitic, has a co-founder named Joel Finkelstein, and is partnered with the ADL and George Soros' Open Society.

I guess this is could be the new strategy now that Piers Morgan got his ass kicked trying to debate Nick Fuentes, but I think that others will follow in the footsteps of Piers Morgan because the audience numbers (for Nick Fuentes related content) are real.

 

[Scott Stapp]

This is what happens after several generations of telling Americans they deserve nothing, but a foreign ethnostate with free healthcare deserves billions every year.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

He’s too popular
They can’t stop him

This appears to be a huge problem

Only a problem for people who he's not popular with.

 

[ShadowRun]

Nick Fuentes is bot-supported, because his ratio of retweets to followers is greater than Destiny, Ian Carroll, Hassan Piker, and Elon Musk; because bots are capable of retweeting but incapable of following?

That's how it works according to the NCRI, the same organization which claims that "Christ is King" is antisemitic, has a co-founder named Joel Finkelstein, and is partnered with the ADL and George Soros' Open Society.

I guess this is could be the new strategy now that Piers Morgan got his ass kicked trying to debate Nick Fuentes, but I think that others will follow in the footsteps of Piers Morgan because the audience numbers (for Nick Fuentes related content) are real.

Yea and men can get pregnant ...... derp

People like to watch slimy people like Nick get put in their place, this is nothing new.

yea the incel virgin ....

Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes admits ‘at least 6 million’ Jews were killed in Nazi Germany​

Fuentes doubled down on his past statement that Adolf Hitler was ‘f—ing cool’​

Fuentes, whose followers are known as groypers, has become popular among white supremacists in recent years, promoting a wide range of antisemitic views and conspiracy theories on his podcast America First. He attended the deadly 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where marchers chanted, “Jews will not replace us”; has denied the Holocaust; and has warned Jews to leave the country. His recent appearance on The Tucker Carlson Show prompted what some are calling a civil war in the Republican Party.

/https://forward.com/news/788512/nick-fuentes-piers-morgan-uncensored-holocaust-hitler/



Morgan confronted Fuentes with a clip from his own podcast where he described his father avoiding restaurants like Applebee's and Red Lobster because they were "associated with African-Americans" (which Fuentes called "Black fare"). Morgan asked if this meant Fuentes was raised in a racist household. Fuentes exploded, calling it a "new low" and an attack on his parents, but later admitted, "I'm racist—everybody is

In a viral moment, Fuentes admitted he's a 27-year-old virgin who's never slept with a woman, while railing against feminism and calling women "annoying" who "grow old." Morgan labeled him a "misogynist dinosaur" and pressed on his advocacy for marriage-only sex despite his own celibacy. Fuentes laughed it off but got defensive when Morgan tied it to his incel-adjacent rhetoric.

 

[gatchaman]

Yea and men can get pregnant ...... derp

People like to watch slimy people like Nick get put in their place, this is nothing new.

yea the incel virgin ....

Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes admits ‘at least 6 million’ Jews were killed in Nazi Germany​

Fuentes doubled down on his past statement that Adolf Hitler was ‘f—ing cool’​

Fuentes, whose followers are known as groypers, has become popular among white supremacists in recent years, promoting a wide range of antisemitic views and conspiracy theories on his podcast America First. He attended the deadly 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where marchers chanted, “Jews will not replace us”; has denied the Holocaust; and has warned Jews to leave the country. His recent appearance on The Tucker Carlson Show prompted what some are calling a civil war in the Republican Party.

/https://forward.com/news/788512/nick-fuentes-piers-morgan-uncensored-holocaust-hitler/



Morgan confronted Fuentes with a clip from his own podcast where he described his father avoiding restaurants like Applebee's and Red Lobster because they were "associated with African-Americans" (which Fuentes called "Black fare"). Morgan asked if this meant Fuentes was raised in a racist household. Fuentes exploded, calling it a "new low" and an attack on his parents, but later admitted, "I'm racist—everybody is

In a viral moment, Fuentes admitted he's a 27-year-old virgin who's never slept with a woman, while railing against feminism and calling women "annoying" who "grow old." Morgan labeled him a "misogynist dinosaur" and pressed on his advocacy for marriage-only sex despite his own celibacy. Fuentes laughed it off but got defensive when Morgan tied it to his incel-adjacent rhetoric.

I'm not letting you change the subject until you admit that the very jewish NCRI is full of shit with its bot research on Nick Fuentes. Reread post #610 if necessary.

Fuck it, I will address your old and new bullshit together.

Of course Fuentes is a racist. He says, "Christ is King.", which according to your own totally-not-a-Jewish-propaganda-front NCRI is antisemitic. Your game is tired old man. Yes, Fuentes is a racist, and so am I by NCRI standards. It's a tired leftist game to label your opponent a bad word. You neocons should go rejoin your liberal allies because you use the same tactics, except that the left can't stand you either. Nick Fuentes is a racist like homosexuals are queer. Queer used to be an epithet until gays embraced it to disarm it. May "racist" suffer the same fate.

What was the racist thing that Nick Fuentes said in the interview?: That the statistic of proportion of black men who have murdered compared to the proportion of white men who have murdered is a more relevant statistic when you choose a bus seat than the absolute number of white compared to black school mass shooters, and this approach also applies to restaurant choice in Chicago. In yours and Piers Morgan's tiny minds, noticing that stereotypes are earned is the same thing as racism.

To people like me, racism would be thinking that other races are like beasts, that my own race is a chosen people, and that associating with the beasts as equals is beneath me. Nick Fuentes does not think this, and he is friends with Jews and Blacks. He even worked for Ye's presidential campaign. You would know all of this if you actually watched the interview instead of googling headlines. You would even know more about the interview if you had just read the youtube comments, which are probably also bot-generated according to the NCRI. Here's the top youtube comment: Piers would never park his car in the hood

hes capping

The attempt by Piers Morgan to attack Fuentes on virginity was also hilarious. Piers Morgan and Nick Fuentes are both Catholic, which forbids extramarital sex. Unsurprisingly, Piers Morgan shows himself to be more of a virtue-signaling Catholic because apparently he is not only in favor of extramarital sex but also female priests.

 

[Koya]

Damn, Piers pivoted so hard when Fuentes pointed out that Israel shares his views on maintaining their demographics, and how in the UK and US whites will soon be a minority.

Despite trying to label him as everything bad, he made Fuentes seem entertaining, funny, and good spirited.

Those boomers don't understand that the meteoric rise of people like Nick Fuentes is exactly because of that particular taboo. Israel wrondoings are mentionned and all of sudden they become the three wise monkeys "See no evil hear no evil". That double standard doesn't work anymore with Zoomers

 

[Unknown Pleasures]

I'm not letting you change the subject until you admit that the very jewish NCRI is full of shit with its bot research on Nick Fuentes. Reread post #610 if necessary.

Fuck it, I will address your old and new bullshit together.

Of course Fuentes is a racist. He says, "Christ is King.", which according to your own totally-not-a-Jewish-propaganda-front NCRI is antisemitic. Your game is tired old man. Yes, Fuentes is a racist, and so am I by NCRI standards. It's a tired leftist game to label your opponent a bad word. You neocons should go rejoin your liberal allies because you use the same tactics, except that the left can't stand you either. Nick Fuentes is a racist like homosexuals are queer. Queer used to be an epithet until gays embraced it to disarm it. May "racist" suffer the same fate.

What was the racist thing that Nick Fuentes said in the interview?: That the statistic of proportion of black men who have murdered compared to the proportion of white men who have murdered is a more relevant statistic when you choose a bus seat than the absolute number of white compared to black school mass shooters, and this approach also applies to restaurant choice in Chicago. In yours and Piers Morgan's tiny minds noticing that stereotypes are earned is the same thing as racism.

To people like me, racism would be thinking that other races are like beasts, that my own race is a chosen people, and that associating with the beasts as equals is beneath me. Nick Fuentes does not think this, and he is friends with Jews and Blacks. He even worked for Ye's presidential campaign. You would know all of this if you actually watched the interview instead of googling headlines. You would even know more about the interview if you had just read the youtube comments, which are probably also bot-generated according to the NCRI. Here's the top youtube comment: Piers would never park his car in the hood

hes capping

The attempt by Piers Morgan to attack Fuentes on virginity was also hilarious. Piers Morgan and Nick Fuentes are both Catholic, which forbids extramarital sex. Unsurprisingly, Piers Morgan shows himself to be more of a virtue-signaling Catholic because apparently he is not only in favor of extramarital sex but also female priests.

Well said.

The dinosaur boomer "this is it". You will also notice how that account only calls on Fuentes "Jew hating madness" to fracture Trump support, instead of hating on blacks, women etc. Because that clearly does NOT take away from Trump support, because again, the Venn diagram has like 95% overlap between Fuentes groyper beliefs with Trump and his pretzels' belief.

So the problem with the right wing griftoverse and all its mainstream nonsense is the pretzels have to bend in such a ridiculous way to condemn Democrats while also condemning their near 100% opposite in Fuentes, while also grifting Trump supporters by excusing all his ridiculous corruption, incompetence, and sex pest activity. Like Good Christian Piers Morgan pretzelling by being all friendly to Stormy Daniels who took extramarital cock from a married guy for money that had a pregnant wife at home, while confronting someone for not having sex before marriage.

 

[High Test With da Best]

Well said.

The dinosaur boomer "this is it". You will also notice how that account only calls on Fuentes "Jew hating madness" to fracture Trump support, instead of hating on blacks, women etc. Because that clearly does NOT take away from Trump support, because again, the Venn diagram has like 95% overlap between Fuentes groyper beliefs with Trump and his pretzels' belief.

So the problem with the right wing griftoverse and all its mainstream nonsense is the pretzels have to bend in such a ridiculous way to condemn Democrats while also condemning their near 100% opposite in Fuentes, while also grifting Trump supporters by excusing all his ridiculous corruption, incompetence, and sex pest activity. Like Good Christian Piers Morgan pretzelling by being all friendly to Stormy Daniels who took extramarital cock from a married guy for money that had a pregnant wife at home, while confronting someone for not having sex before marriage.

Have you always found Daniels to be a trustworthy person? How long does that go back before that story and what caused it?

And did you also historically find Mike Avenatti trustworthy? And how long before that story did your trust in him begin and what caused it?

 

[Kassitus]

Freeing Palestine is the only thing here that I agree with. Not falling for it tho.

You old school WNs only care about Palestine as a way to shit on Jews. We all know what you think about Muslims in general...

It's true I don't think highly of Islam, though I do think all peoples deserve sovereignty and autonomy, regardless of whether or not that also repudiates Jewish tyrants.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Well said.

The dinosaur boomer "this is it". You will also notice how that account only calls on Fuentes "Jew hating madness" to fracture Trump support, instead of hating on blacks, women etc. Because that clearly does NOT take away from Trump support, because again, the Venn diagram has like 95% overlap between Fuentes groyper beliefs with Trump and his pretzels' belief.

What are the beliefs of the 4 moth old online slang term? Do tell.

 

[Unknown Pleasures]

Have you always found Daniels to be a trustworthy person? How long does that go back before that story and what caused it?

And did you also historically find Mike Avenatti trustworthy? And how long before that story did your trust in him begin and what caused it?

I don't really have much of an opinion on Daniels outside of a general disregard for sex workers and the industry. I'm perhaps old fashioned and think it's a bit silly to put sex work on an equal plane to the vast majority of other forms of work.

I know even less about Avenatti. The whole scenario they were all involved in seems of the "not a lot of brain cells by any party" variety.