Social Nick Fuentes is getting way too popular

[Unknown Pleasures]

Fuentes isn't meant to be taken serious; he is theatre.

Just like the president, he is not meant to be taken serious, he is theatre too. Fuentes is just a Trump on a bit of steroids - he is even more unapologetic, even more rude and cruel to out-groups. Neither of them can or have much in the way of political ideology outside of self-promotion. They both say so many ridiculous things news cycles can't keep up.

They are mirrors with just a teeny tiny touch of a narcissism of small differences. That is the whole point of the absurdity. To watch one griftoverse look at a steamy mirror, wipe the condensation off, and see pretty much themselves, and be so confused and hate it. The cognitive dissonance required to look at one clown and say "what an idiot" then look at damn near identical clown and be "I will defend and contort to every stupid idea and whim of this person no matter how idiotic". To complain about "how stupid" a layman sounds, while also then defending and contorting to someone that sounds even stupider and deeming them fit for highest office in the land.

As one astute observer notes "imagine being a grown man and talking like this" but not having the wherewithal to see how "grown men" in the highest positions of politics are talking in a much more pathetic manner and being completely rabidly supported, defended, and contorted to.

 

[Last Samurai]

First I sense a bit of animosity so just know there is none on my part. It's not personal and a subject I'm looking at from a distance.

So on the topic I posted a video above on that very page that isn't low IQ clickbait. It instead raises very legitimate questions, has a lot of different angles and chapters but the only answer you get from Fuentes types is "it's low IQ". Then please demonstrate I would say to them. If it's low IQ clickbait why flee the discussion instead of crushing it with solid arguments?

The questions about the rifle and the fact that such a weapon should have blown his neck and head off to start. About his change of narrative towards Israel second, and the many things he said that made him seem ready to a 180° on the subject. To be clear I don't think any straight conclusions can be definitely drawn out, but the questions are legitimate and would it be the first time a security agency has lied ? So dismissing it as "low IQ" without answering and avoiding discussion seems like a cope out.

I also don't think he's "a fed" but a lot of political figures have been known to collude with security agencies in one way or another, think Edgar Hoover supplying intel he shouldn't have to senator McCarthy or Chicago machine style politics where they used FBI contacts informally providing intel in exchange for getting early warnings of investigations. It's not a conspiracy you can look those historical facts up.

There is no doubt they already approached him because his popularity raises security concerns. You never know when a political figure changes his tone because he has received a visit or a deal. I think it might be that. But I don't know for sure and it might not. Just staying open minded.

You sense animosity... are you new to the internet?

Look, I'm not going to get into a debate over some random video you posted. You seem genuinely lost when it comes to Nick Fuentes' take on the murder of Charlie Kirk, so let me help. Instead of watching others discuss his clips, why not hear it from him directly? On rumble, he has a video 2 months ago titled low iq antisemitism. Watch it - and if you still don't get it, then I really don't know what to say - maybe don't go jumping head first into every rabbit hole you see.

 

[Koya]

Mistake posted the same message twice

 

[Last Samurai]

Did you just copy/paste the same response from before?


It wasn't such a good message that it warranted being posted twice.

 

[Spam On Rye]

Everything, really....

Like...

Of course you could not come up with examples.

Your response had nothing to do with my comment. Engage directly with it and I'll gladly respond. Until then, I'm gonna have fun with it.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Your response had nothing to do with my comment. Engage directly with it and I'll gladly respond. Until then, I'm gonna have fun with it.

Your comment has nothing to do with reality.

 

[Spam On Rye]

Your comment has nothing to do with reality.

Then why comment on my comment without actually engaging with the comment and then asking for a genuine response? Yr either bad faith or ignorant here.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Then why comment on my comment without actually engaging with the comment and then asking for a genuine response? Yr either bad faith or ignorant here.

Because the comment was not really engaging with me was it?

 

[Spam On Rye]

Because the comment was not really engaging with me was it?

What are you talking about? You commented on my take of the segment without engaging with anything I said. What did you expect in response?

 

[Kassitus]

Fuentes isn't meant to be taken serious; he is theatre.

Just like the president, he is not meant to be taken serious, he is theatre too. Fuentes is just a Trump on a bit of steroids - he is even more unapologetic, even more rude and cruel to out-groups. Neither of them can or have much in the way of political ideology outside of self-promotion. They both say so many ridiculous things news cycles can't keep up.

They are mirrors with just a teeny tiny touch of a narcissism of small differences. That is the whole point of the absurdity. To watch one griftoverse look at a steamy mirror, wipe the condensation off, and see pretty much themselves, and be so confused and hate it. The cognitive dissonance required to look at one clown and say "what an idiot" then look at damn near identical clown and be "I will defend and contort to every stupid idea and whim of this person no matter how idiotic". To complain about "how stupid" a layman sounds, while also then defending and contorting to someone that sounds even stupider and deeming them fit for highest office in the land.

As one astute observer notes "imagine being a grown man and talking like this" but not having the wherewithal to see how "grown men" in the highest positions of politics are talking in a much more pathetic manner and being completely rabidly supported, defended, and contorted to.

I found it interesting that that was one of Nick's big criticisms of Trump, the needless cruelty in the name of theater.

 

[Unknown Pleasures]

I found it interesting that that was one of Nick's big criticisms of Trump, the needless cruelty in the name of theater.

Again, it's the same playbook, like 95% overlap. Remember Trump's origins in politics -- birtherism, going on "debates" and using silly nicknames for other Republican candidates, the RNC chairman having to tell candidates to act like adults so as not to embarrass themselves.

Then all of a sudden the window shifted and being like juvenile children and grown men trolling like 12 year olds playing Battlefield became the most powerful political strategy. Now this right wing griftoverse goes into shambles because a much wittier (though less ambitious) and eloquent person has gotten hold of the playbook and is shamelessly using it while actually having the balls to call out folks on their bullshit while Democrats sit there twiddling their thumbs like controlled opposition.

 

[TrueBias]

If anything positive could be taken from that interview, it's that Fuentes showed how absolutely unarmed these MSM tabloid pieces of shit are, when you stray from their narrative.

"Are you admitting that you're racist right now?"

"Yeah, sure. I'm racist"

""

Yeah the staring contests that he did were more sad than the Fuentes answers. Then he asks AGAIN, gets the same answer, and stares again. Jesus, he shouldve went into that alone instead of being in visual disbelief.

 

[AmonTobin]

Mostly bots. FELL FOR IT AGAN.

 

[Kassitus]

Yeah the staring contests that he did were more sad than the Fuentes answers. Then he asks AGAIN, gets the same answer, and stares again. Jesus, he shouldve went into that alone instead of being in visual disbelief.

Then in the middle of the stare of shock and horror: "Why? Too soon?" You could almost hear the gears in Piers head grinding to a halt.

 

[Unknown Pleasures]

Holy shit this is just a hilarious video and exposes the bizarre sad state of political affairs in the right wing griftoverse.

it appears Milo Yannopolous, disgraced advocate for underaged sex with priests and successfully converted from homosexuality to going hetero, has receipts on someone I'm hardly familiar with outside of people spamming his low grade propaganda, Benny Johnson, who apparently Yannopolous has complete comfort in exposing as a homosexual who may have preyed on underaged boys in Turning Point young leaders association meetings or something along those lines.

Apparently the right wing (remember all the posters talking about the classness of the left in light of poor Charlie Kirk's murder) are all trying to outdo each other for bizarre stories around Charlie Kirk now that he's no longer available to defend himself, including that Kirk too was a homosexual living a double life, and that Candance Owens cared for him more than his wife. However, they also note that Charlie Kirk has not been buried yet, and may still be alive!

And the video also talks about The Daily Wire's viewership cratering is due to fake accounts in the past being found out.

It's such a sad state of affairs this video of these idiots is legit funnier than some of the best of political satire comedy.

 

[White Whale]

This is true.

 

[Koya]

Did you just copy/paste the same response from before?


It wasn't such a good message that it warranted being posted twice.

I did it by mistake my bad

 

[Koya]

You sense animosity... are you new to the internet?

Look, I'm not going to get into a debate over some random video you posted. You seem genuinely lost when it comes to Nick Fuentes' take on the murder of Charlie Kirk, so let me help. Instead of watching others discuss his clips, why not hear it from him directly? On rumble, he has a video 2 months ago titled low iq antisemitism. Watch it - and if you still don't get it, then I really don't know what to say - maybe don't go jumping head first into every rabbit hole you see.

If you don't want to engage in the content I present to you but want to engage in the content you present to me it's not fair. And not a sign of good will in any discussion.

I don't have any goal to persuade you, you're free to disagree or even to refuse the discussion. I am merely sharing my views.

I do like to have contradictory debates but if it's not your thing then no harm done.

On a more general note I don't think Fuentes is that brilliant, I listened to him to see what he's about, I even think he's mediocre. He makes some common sense points that sadly the left has lost (being hard on crime, having controlled immigration), fair enough, and his unapologetic which everyone should be, but in general his analysis lacks 2 points : historical context and self awareness about how to enforce his conclusions. Some which could lead to the partition of the USA quite frankly if enforced like he wants.

Nonetheless he appeals to a very big crowd and that means this crowd feels unheard in the political sphere. I don't think his audience manufactured like other have said in here. So at least some of the concerns of that crowd should be heard and taken seriously.

Oh by the way I agree low IQ antisemitism that "blames everything on the Jews" is stupid, unproductive and racist. I just see that there are a lot of valid questions that are unanswered in Charlie Kirk assassination. And people who disagree don't want to answer them and flee them like a fire, like you just did. Again not an attack, just and assessment.

 

[curryjunkie]

Holy shit this is just a hilarious video and exposes the bizarre sad state of political affairs in the right wing griftoverse.

it appears Milo Yannopolous, disgraced advocate for underaged sex with priests and successfully converted from homosexuality to going hetero, has receipts on someone I'm hardly familiar with outside of people spamming his low grade propaganda, Benny Johnson, who apparently Yannopolous has complete comfort in exposing as a homosexual who may have preyed on underaged boys in Turning Point young leaders association meetings or something along those lines.

Apparently the right wing (remember all the posters talking about the classness of the left in light of poor Charlie Kirk's murder) are all trying to outdo each other for bizarre stories around Charlie Kirk now that he's no longer available to defend himself, including that Kirk too was a homosexual living a double life, and that Candance Owens cared for him more than his wife. However, they also note that Charlie Kirk has not been buried yet, and may still be alive!

And the video also talks about The Daily Wire's viewership cratering is due to fake accounts in the past being found out.

It's such a sad state of affairs this video of these idiots is legit funnier than some of the best of political satire comedy.

saw a movie trailer yesterday for a B movie fantasy about merlin, wasnt really paying attention until the daily wire popped up as a producer, apparently their attempts so far to enter the non woke entertainment space hasnt been going well.

 

[fedoriswar37]

Holy shit this is just a hilarious video and exposes the bizarre sad state of political affairs in the right wing griftoverse.

it appears Milo Yannopolous, disgraced advocate for underaged sex with priests and successfully converted from homosexuality to going hetero, has receipts on someone I'm hardly familiar with outside of people spamming his low grade propaganda, Benny Johnson, who apparently Yannopolous has complete comfort in exposing as a homosexual who may have preyed on underaged boys in Turning Point young leaders association meetings or something along those lines.

Apparently the right wing (remember all the posters talking about the classness of the left in light of poor Charlie Kirk's murder) are all trying to outdo each other for bizarre stories around Charlie Kirk now that he's no longer available to defend himself, including that Kirk too was a homosexual living a double life, and that Candance Owens cared for him more than his wife. However, they also note that Charlie Kirk has not been buried yet, and may still be alive!

And the video also talks about The Daily Wire's viewership cratering is due to fake accounts in the past being found out.

It's such a sad state of affairs this video of these idiots is legit funnier than some of the best of political satire comedy.

Don't you have some parent molestation to gleefully fight for somewhere weirdo?