• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Nick Fuentes is getting way too popular

I mean indigenous were Asians who crossed. So if he's part Spanish and asian, he can't be a white nationalist unless he's completely retarded. Like actual white nationalist would not allow it. It's like Jewish neo Nazi who thinks he's part of that or hasn't read both hitlers books on race. Unless he's pure Spaniard he's retarded and actual white nationalist will eventually kill him. These guys are crazy.
 
I mean indigenous were Asians who crossed. So if he's part Spanish and asian, he can't be a white nationalist unless he's completely retarded. Like actual white nationalist would not allow it. It's like Jewish neo Nazi who thinks he's part of that or hasn't read both hitlers books on race. Unless he's pure Spaniard he's retarded and actual white nationalist will eventually kill him. These guys are crazy.
Fillipno Michelle Malkin is also white supremacist now. <HanaKimura01>
 
I just started listening or noticing him, so I started the Piers Morgan one.

Hes hilarious. I have to finish the interview, but I loved the beginning, didnt really like the Hitler is cool shit. I mean, I blame Morgan for not asking better questions.

When he said he's racist, there's no dispute, but he didnt come off hateful.

Folks, racist and hateful are different things. Its real bad when they're together, hateful is bad, but everyone is a little racist. You say otherwise, ill show you a liar.

Stereotypes are earned, boys n girls.
 
Congratulations, you have added the clip and now fully join the ranks of Ben Shapiro and Piers Morgan in clip farming.

Political incorrectness is precisely what separates Nick Fuentes from other public figures and is the key to his appeal; Nick Fuentes wouldn't be interesting if he was just like other public figures.

Why should you believe his words? You shouldn't blindly believe anyone, not even follow-the-science-I-am-the-science-Fauci.

I'm not advocating for you to do anything, but clip farming is an indication that you are not seriously engaged in the topic, and it is your credibility that suffers.
He certainly pushes the limits of free speech which rubs so many republicans wrong cause they're actually liberals at heart. Free Speech only constitutes things they want to hear.
 
Folks, racist and hateful are different things. Its real bad when they're together, hateful is bad, but everyone is a little racist.

Nah, but we understand that you know deep down what a huge piece of shit you are, so it's a nice lie to tell yourself.
 
Hes hilarious. I have to finish the interview, but I loved the beginning, didnt really like the Hitler is cool shit. I mean, I blame Morgan for not asking better questions.

When he said he's racist, there's no dispute, but he didnt come off hateful.

Folks, racist and hateful are different things. Its real bad when they're together, hateful is bad, but everyone is a little racist. You say otherwise, ill show you a liar.

Stereotypes are earned, boys n girls.
If anything positive could be taken from that interview, it's that Fuentes showed how absolutely unarmed these MSM tabloid pieces of shit are, when you stray from their narrative.

"Are you admitting that you're racist right now?"

"Yeah, sure. I'm racist"


"<Huh2>"
 
If anything positive could be taken from that interview, it's that Fuentes showed how absolutely unarmed these MSM tabloid pieces of shit are, when you stray from their narrative.

"Are you admitting that you're racist right now?"

"Yeah, sure. I'm racist"


"<Huh2>"
Even losers got to have hero’s
 
If anything positive could be taken from that interview, it's that Fuentes showed how absolutely unarmed these MSM tabloid pieces of shit are, when you stray from their narrative.

Piers isnt MSM. He's the very definition of tabloid journalism. My god, this is someone who got caught hacking celebrity voicemails to publish them.
 
The thing with the mainstream right wing griftoverse
Do you ever just stop and listen to the shite you spout

Imagine being a grown adult and talking like this

Go get a hobby or a girlfriend. Being angry that the whole world doesnt think in your insane way is not a hobby
 
Do you ever just stop and listen to the shite you spout

Imagine being a grown adult and talking like this

Go get a hobby or a girlfriend. Being angry that the whole world doesnt think in your insane way is not a hobby

Holy smokes, major FDS.
 
Holy smokes, major FDS.
You honestly think thats a normal way to speak/type and approach the world

Its an utterly mental world view and way to start an argument

There arent really monsters under your bed. Maybe mummy and daddy didnt tell you.
 
It's crazy how much support he's getting. It doesn't seem natural to me. Maybe he is indeed a fed or CIA.

I went down the alt right rabbit hole recently and boy is it war down there. I found this video and the way Fuentes is rebuking any questions about how Charlie Kirk was assassinated he sure falls in line well with whatever the feds say

 
I have no idea who fuentes is

I'm just in here to see the far left lunatics go mental like Andy Capp

Topic of the thread you are in ... lost and senile. Speaking of going mental have you heard from Candace, Tim and Ben?

GDxRmkkWoAEq1wE
 
In general Fuentes is not brillant, not eloquent, has no depth in his analysis, and with really not much interesting to say. I listened and tried to see if there was something more of substance but no. He's just abrasive and funny. It's like 4chan personified.

The fact he has such a high surge in popularity means he echos to an audience who doesn't feel listened to. He gives offer to a demand. That demand is real. It's not manufactured.

All that stems from the GOP insane "Israel First" stance and MAGA being really MIGA (Make Israel Great Again) but even then they can't admit it and can't separate even partially from it and try to add nuance to that because they're so deeply controlled by AIPAC and other pro Israeli lobbies.

And just that is the proof that Fuentes and his base need to assert dominance. Because it is indeed proof.
 
Last edited:
I went down the alt right rabbit hole recently and boy is it war down there. I found this video and the way Fuentes is rebuking any questions about how Charlie Kirk was assassinated he sure falls in line well with whatever the feds say



You could look at it that way.

Or you could say he has some common sense.

Imo Fuentes makes it very clear that these Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories are low iq clickbait - if his arguments didn't convince you, then I don't think the logical answer is that he's a fed - I think maybe it says something about you.
 
You could look at it that way.

Or you could say he has some common sense.

Imo Fuentes makes it very clear that these Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories are low iq clickbait - if his arguments didn't convince you, then I don't think the logical answer is that he's a fed - I think maybe it says something about you.

First I sense a bit of animosity so just know there is none on my part. It's not personal and a subject I'm looking at from a distance.

So on the topic I posted a video above on that very page that isn't low IQ clickbait. It instead raises very legitimate questions, has a lot of different angles and chapters but the only answer you get from Fuentes types is "it's low IQ". Then please demonstrate I would say to them. If it's low IQ clickbait why flee the discussion instead of crushing it with solid arguments?

The questions about the rifle and the fact that such a weapon should have blown his neck and head off to start. About his change of narrative towards Israel second, and the many things he said that made him seem ready to a 180° on the subject. To be clear I don't think any straight conclusions can be definitely drawn out, but the questions are legitimate and would it be the first time a security agency has lied ? So dismissing it as "low IQ" without answering and avoiding discussion seems like a cope out.

I also don't think he's "a fed" but a lot of political figures have been known to collude with security agencies in one way or another, think Edgar Hoover supplying intel he shouldn't have to senator McCarthy or Chicago machine style politics where they used FBI contacts informally providing intel in exchange for getting early warnings of investigations. It's not a conspiracy you can look those historical facts up.

There is no doubt they already approached him because his popularity raises security concerns. You never know when a political figure changes his tone because he has received a visit or a deal. I think it might be that. But I don't know for sure and it might not. Just staying open minded.
 
Back
Top