- Joined
- Aug 20, 2016
- Messages
- 3,315
- Reaction score
- 5,639
Did they talk about how they love gay dudes buying children?
Newsome rolled over so hardly better though can't blame Kirk for that I guess.Kudos to Kirk for finally going after something that isn't low hanging fruit like retarded liberal students at universities
Everything I've heard the last year or so suggested that Newsome was some smooth talking debater. I wonder if Charlie expected more.Newsome rolled over so hardly better though can't blame Kirk for that I guess.
He reserves the smooth talking for his affairs.Everything I've heard the last year or so suggested that Newsome was some smooth talking debater. I wonder if Charlie expected more.
You can just say liberal students at universities. The other part is implied.Kudos to Kirk for finally going after something that isn't low hanging fruit like retarded liberal students at universities
Charlie Kirk is a conservative speaker and leads Turning point, a conservative platform. He has some influence.Sorry, I'm not understanding
Pretty crazy that Newsom thinks this is an actual strategy to give someone like Charlie Kirk a platform to basically talk over him, where Newsom basically just casually agrees with him throughout with his raspy voice. Like his horribly designed set, agreeing with republicans, is going to somehow rebrand him, while creepily saying “stress test this” multiple times. Newsom legit sounds like a lizard person
Like just because trump gained momentum because of “podcasts”. He thinks he can just create a podcast, and that is it, we win people Back.
What a huge misstep lol
This is Charlie Kirk’s post of it with his own commentary at certain points, but damn, newsom is awful
I give Newsom credit for jumping right into the lion's den. Maybe that's what America needs to see from Democrats in order to swing enough people back to them to win elections. They don't want to see people like Kamala Harris get all the media love despite her having no platform and unable to take one difficult question throughout the entirety of her Presidential campaigns. Like it or not, people see Charlie Kirk winning debates easily with facts and that has a big impact. Why don't you ever see a Charlie Kirk or a Ben Shapiro from the Left regularly debating other intellectuals? It's because their arguments are based off of emotion and they use guilt tripping as a winning strategy. America is clearly done with that.Appreciate the honesty. But yea, this is a huge political blunder IMO. Kirk isn’t a politician, he is a podcast/radio talker that has these talking points memorized to a tee, where as an active politician more so does hit pieces/prepared events, rather than just consistent, day in and day out arguing these points.
Makes the democrats look awful that some “no name” is able to complete destroy Newsom for a hour non stop lol
You do. His name is destiny , he loves off of Adderall and is an absolute cuck.I give Newsom credit for jumping right into the lion's den. Maybe that's what America needs to see from Democrats in order to swing enough people back to them to win elections. They don't want to see people like Kamala Harris get all the media love despite her having no platform and unable to take one difficult question throughout the entirety of her Presidential campaigns. Like it or not, people see Charlie Kirk winning debates easily with facts and that has a big impact. Why don't you ever see a Charlie Kirk or a Ben Shapiro from the Left regularly debating other intellectuals? It's because their arguments are based off of emotion and they use guilt tripping as a winning strategy. America is clearly done with that.