• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Elections Newsom starts a podcast and his first guest is Charlie Kirk

there should be more left vs right debates with these podcasts I don't know what that became taboo all the last few years
 
Good for him. Open discourse should be encouraged and the political system has gotten so far off track in that regard, with nothing but negative effects.
 
Newsom is trying to turn to the center left to appeal to more people. His time is up though.
 
Pretty crazy that Newsom thinks this is an actual strategy to give someone like Charlie Kirk a platform to basically talk over him, where Newsom basically just casually agrees with him throughout with his raspy voice. Like his horribly designed set, agreeing with republicans, is going to somehow rebrand him, while creepily saying “stress test this” multiple times. Newsom legit sounds like a lizard person

Like just because trump gained momentum because of “podcasts”. He thinks he can just create a podcast, and that is it, we win people Back.

What a huge misstep lol

This is Charlie Kirk’s post of it with his own commentary at certain points, but damn, newsom is awful


You know it's a wrong move cause he has the wrong ideas so he ends up losing the debate.
That's the only reason the libs think it's a bad move for him
 
Appreciate the honesty. But yea, this is a huge political blunder IMO. Kirk isn’t a politician, he is a podcast/radio talker that has these talking points memorized to a tee, where as an active politician more so does hit pieces/prepared events, rather than just consistent, day in and day out arguing these points.

Makes the democrats look awful that some “no name” is able to complete destroy Newsom for a hour non stop lol
I give Newsom credit for jumping right into the lion's den. Maybe that's what America needs to see from Democrats in order to swing enough people back to them to win elections. They don't want to see people like Kamala Harris get all the media love despite her having no platform and unable to take one difficult question throughout the entirety of her Presidential campaigns. Like it or not, people see Charlie Kirk winning debates easily with facts and that has a big impact. Why don't you ever see a Charlie Kirk or a Ben Shapiro from the Left regularly debating other intellectuals? It's because their arguments are based off of emotion and they use guilt tripping as a winning strategy. America is clearly done with that.
 
I give Newsom credit for jumping right into the lion's den. Maybe that's what America needs to see from Democrats in order to swing enough people back to them to win elections. They don't want to see people like Kamala Harris get all the media love despite her having no platform and unable to take one difficult question throughout the entirety of her Presidential campaigns. Like it or not, people see Charlie Kirk winning debates easily with facts and that has a big impact. Why don't you ever see a Charlie Kirk or a Ben Shapiro from the Left regularly debating other intellectuals? It's because their arguments are based off of emotion and they use guilt tripping as a winning strategy. America is clearly done with that.
You do. His name is destiny , he loves off of Adderall and is an absolute cuck.
 
Not a fan of Newsom but I listened to it.

Kudos to him for having the balls to have Kirk on there. Kirk definitely made Newsom and the left look foolish. Newsom strikes me as not someone caught up with leftist thinking, just dishonest and willing to say whatever it takes to get a vote.
 
Really never heard of him? Without knowing their voices, which were very influential in the MAGA movement kind of shows you have no idea about current political spectrum. Not an attack or anything, as I think I have talked with you before, playing the part of the die hard trumper, in similar context.

However, the fact newsom is starting his first podcast with Kirk, and Kirk is actively running circles around is also indicative of politics right now, in a complete blunder.

Very entertaining to me at least
I don't really think that being unaware of a specific political figure is the same as having no idea about the political spectrum, but you might be right.

What I'd say you're wrong on is me playing the part- of anything. There are things about Trump that I like and some that I don't. Yes, you and I have spoken on several occasions and seen eye to eye- none of that was insincere
 
I don't really think that being unaware of a specific political figure is the same as having no idea about the political spectrum, but you might be right.

What I'd say you're wrong on is me playing the part- of anything. There are things about Trump that I like and some that I don't. Yes, you and I have spoken on several occasions and seen eye to eye- none of that was insincere

Sorry, I meant that I was/am the die hard trumper, not you. Was basically just saying that I am more in-tune with MAGA world, so I understand you may not know Kirk. But I do feel MAGA has completely usurped the right, and thus changing the political spectrum. Worth knowing who people like Kirk is. His turning point action group really helped get out the vote in swing states, I feel basically winning Trump the election. Musk helped fund them a lot

This is politico about musk’s PAC teaming up with Kirk in WI, but they also teamed up in all the swing states, but especially PA

 
Back
Top