I don't want Newsom ether he would get lit up with his COVID restaurant trips his asinine podcast nonsense. He looks more like someone you see on Abercrombie & Fitch catalog then a President. Democrats need someone who is a moderate democrat and I hate saying that and a military veteran and is a combat veteran not someone who was in Italy during the war "Walz":Michelle Obama prob would smoke Trump too just based on her last name. Now watch the dems run some can like Newsom in 2028 and fumble a layup election.
It has to be a male, too. America is obviously not ready for a female Prez.
FTFY.Houston Cougars style
Possibly, but that would be because of her last name. If her last name was "Brown", she wouldn't stand a chance.Not true. Michelle Obama would smoke anyone in an election and she's a black woman. The problem is Kamala wasn't it at all.
WNBA style
Possibly, but that would be because of her last name. If her last name was "Brown", she wouldn't stand a chance.
I'm just in disagreement here. I don't think America is ready to elect a female President. I'm taking a "I'll believe it when I see it" stance. Just my $0.02. And there is no way in holy hell Kamala will run on the ticket again.Being husband to a GOAT in popularity obviously helps, but she is also very likeable and charismatic, very open when discussing topics, can handle aggression very well on the fly, pretty much many of the traits that Kamala isn't lol. Michelle is just an example, but I think she easily clears in a race. If they start getting the right female candidate ready now I definitely think they'd have a legit shot at winning, but if they go back to the Kamala well then it'll just be more JD Vance maga or something.
I'm just in disagreement here. I don't think America is ready to elect a female President. I'm taking a "I'll believe it when I see it" stance. Just my $0.02. And there is no way in holy hell Kamala will run on the ticket again.
Very good point. Kamala was not charismatic also. Hard to find a woman like an Obama or Clinton.
Why do people who don't understand polls try to talk about polls?It was a poll of of 1100 people, going 53-47 in Obama's direction with nearly a 3% margin of error.
And this!
Why do people who don't understand polls try to talk about polls?