International New Finnish Study Finds No Evidence For Man-Made Climate Change

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Tropodan, Jul 11, 2019.

  1. Tropodan

    Tropodan Silver Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    10,955
    Location:
    Canada eh!
    The paper, titled ‘No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change’ was published by Jyrki Kauppinen and Pekka Malmi.

    The study found that, “During the last hundred years the temperature is increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”

    https://summit.news/2019/07/11/new-finnish-study-finds-no-evidence-for-man-made-climate-change/

    We need to develop green technologies and take care of our environment but man made global warming is an insidious hoax perpetrated by radical environmentalists and opportunistic politicians and investors.
     
  2. zebby23

    zebby23 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    10,049
    Likes Received:
    14,495
    Published by Paul Joseph Watson

    Paul Joseph Watson is an English YouTube personality, radio host, writer and conspiracy theorist. He has been described as 'alt-right' by multiple sources. Although as late as July 2016 he called himself alt-right, he no longer accepts that label and considers himself part of the "New Right."

    Sounds legit
     
  3. Sycho Sid

    Sycho Sid Master of the world and the universe Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,785
    Likes Received:
    24,389
    Man made climate change is real. Gravity exists. The earth is round. Soylent green is people
     
  4. The Merchant

    The Merchant Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    3,363
    Likes Received:
    4,261
    Read the paper it's only basically a page of text and some graphs. Doesn't seem that definitive.
     
  5. 2DUM2TAP

    2DUM2TAP Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    11,150
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Location:
    On top of a Mountain punch dancing my rage away
    So this is the correct study and all the other studies are bunk eh?
     
    mon, BEER, no fat chicks and 14 others like this.
  6. zebby23

    zebby23 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    10,049
    Likes Received:
    14,495
    TS is going to look really bad in this thread... Maybe ask a mod to delete it and save yourself the embarrassment
     
  7. zebby23

    zebby23 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    10,049
    Likes Received:
    14,495
    Certainly... Just like the bible is the only correct religious book. The rest? All nonsense and completely made up
     
  8. Cole train

    Cole train Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,418
    Likes Received:
    6,419
    Location:
    Finland
    aaahhh turku university....western finland .

    "pukes"
     
  9. Trotsky

    Trotsky Gold Belt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2016
    Messages:
    20,559
    Likes Received:
    51,657
    Hmmm, the study is six pages long and almost exclusively cites to previous work by the authors. I do not believe that it "illustrates how there is no overwhelming consensus on man-made global warming as the media often claims," as stated in the article.
     
  10. Tropodan

    Tropodan Silver Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    10,955
    Location:
    Canada eh!
    Paul Watson posting it is irrelevant and being referred to as "alt right" means nothing other than leftists have labelled him to slander his reputation ad hominem.
     
    TONY-T, Crim, raty tat tat and 3 others like this.
  11. Tropodan

    Tropodan Silver Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    10,955
    Location:
    Canada eh!
    Posters here are conflating studies that show temperature rises with studies that definitively prove humans are warming the planet.
     
    MichiganMMA1978 likes this.
  12. sloppypie

    sloppypie Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2016
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    4,529
    lol, you don't get to play the "source isn't relevant" card. you alt right lunatics go around bashing every article / source that are perfectly valid like the new york times (even calling them fake news you fucking psychos) but the second an alt right personality posts a bunk study, you suddenly don't want the source questioned.

    either you are retarded or you are a deliberate fraud. either way this thread is shit and should get dumped.
     
  13. MMAisGod

    MMAisGod Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    2,683
    Location:
    Tampa Bay, Florida
    If this is true, this is what you need to be proving. Your OP does not adequately prove this, at all.
     
    Higus and Sycho Sid like this.
  14. Hit-N-Run

    Hit-N-Run Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    2,257
    Location:
    Naked, in front of computer
    Sources "Summit News".......

    Paul Watson written article....

    Former InfoWars editor....

    This thread.....

    [​IMG]
     
  15. zebby23

    zebby23 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    10,049
    Likes Received:
    14,495
    Conspiracy theorist... I'm sure you would give complete credibility to an article posted by some extreme left winger
     
  16. zebby23

    zebby23 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2017
    Messages:
    10,049
    Likes Received:
    14,495
    Just saw these alt right goons posting in another thread, they were like, omg yahoo news... totally legit.
     
  17. BJ@LW&WW

    [email protected]&WW Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Location:
    LA
    paul watson is not the source. Kauppinen and Malmi of the physics department at the university of turku are.

    it should be noted that this is posted on a scientific arxiv site. there is no peer review.
     
    Tropodan likes this.
  18. 44nutman

    44nutman The Original Nut of Sherdog Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    10,193
    Likes Received:
    24,005
    Location:
    Space Mountain
    the authors take a sensitivity value from their own papers and then use this to show CO2 has no effect. This is a bit strange since it means they take a value they came up with and use it in an equation to get a result that conforms to the expectation they had based on their previous papers! It's a bit like me writing a paper proving my perpetual motion machine works by using an equation I came up with to show that perpetual motion works …
    Found the above quote online. They are using their own formula to prove something they have already pre determined. AKA cooking the data.

    TS, Listen Dude, you might want to read the fucking report you quoted. The same report has stated the CO2 has increased in the atmosphere since 1975.

    Also this paper has not been peer reviewed. The paper has 6 references and 4 are by the author.
     
  19. SmilinDesperado

    SmilinDesperado Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Messages:
    13,197
    Likes Received:
    26,335
    I wish TS had the ability to feel shame.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2019
  20. TUFNewb

    TUFNewb Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,327
    Likes Received:
    11,688
    Lol climate deniers and antivaxxers sure do love to cherry pick poorly done non peer reviewed papers don't they.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.