Oh man, I was just gonna watch that. Thanks for spoiling it...Soylent green is people
Published by Paul Joseph Watson
Paul Joseph Watson is an English YouTube personality, radio host, writer and conspiracy theorist. He has been described as 'alt-right' by multiple sources. Although as late as July 2016 he called himself alt-right, he no longer accepts that label and considers himself part of the "New Right."
Sounds legit
Man made climate change is real. Gravity exists. The earth is round. Soylent green is people
Read the paper it's only basically a page of text and some graphs. Doesn't seem that definitive.
So this is the correct study and all the other studies are bunk eh?
^^^^^^^Says team Dunning-Kruger in classic NPC fashion.Hmmm, the study is six pages long and almost exclusively cites to previous work by the authors. I do not believe that it "illustrates how there is no overwhelming consensus on man-made global warming as the media often claims," as stated in the article.
Alt righters are hilarious. Just because Al Gore pushed climate change, they have been rustled.
I live in Central Florida for the last 20 years and let me tell you the last couple years it has been hotter than Satan's Taint in the summer. Heat Indexes over 105 on the regular.
I don't need two Finnish Bozos that are cooking data to tell me climate change is fake, I feel it more and more over the summer. It is getting hotter.
Over 90% scientist agree that the climate is changing. They may disagree on the reasons why but they agree. Now every bullshit science paper that disagrees with climate change has to be posted on Sherdog. Sad part is the posters never even bother to read what they are posting.
If this 6 page earth shattering paper that was not peer reviewed, would have been read by the TS, the TS would have thought twice about posting it.
^^^^^^^Says team Dunning-Kruger in classic NPC fashion.
Damn, with you people it boils down to this. The information must come directly from the climate change division at the Bureau of Imaginary information or it does not exist,
Yeah, yeah... fine, whatever, but had the climate change division at the Bureau of Imaginary information published the exact opposite, it would be promoted on their networks, 24/7.It's 3 pages, and has 6 citations in total.............
Yeah, yeah... fine, whatever, but had the climate change division at the Bureau of Imaginary information published the exact opposite, it would be promoted on their networks, 24/7.
Yeah, yeah... fine, whatever, but had the climate change division at the Bureau of Imaginary information published the exact opposite, it would be promoted on their networks, 24/7.
I'm not well versed on the science behind climate change, but will say I don't support anything that will deter people from being more environmentally conscious. I'm afraid some would use studies such as this as an excuse to abandon stewardship of our planet. Whether we're responsible for global warming is largely irrelevant in the overall necessity of taking better care of the environment. Micro plastics, pollution, destruction of habitat, etc are all things we need to get a better handle on and we don't need people shrugging shoulders while washing hands of their part in damage done because they read about something in the same sphere as being beyond their control. T
is all coming from a guy who enjoys using the great outdoors. From camping, wheeling or plinking in the bush to just chilling by a river I'm a fan of using the great outdoors in a sustainable and responsible way.
Michigan has been much colder. Our spring was like winter this year. Your logic is flawed.Alt righters are hilarious. Just because Al Gore pushed climate change, they have been rustled.
I live in Central Florida for the last 20 years and let me tell you the last couple years it has been hotter than Satan's Taint in the summer. Heat Indexes over 105 on the regular.
I don't need two Finnish Bozos that are cooking data to tell me climate change is fake, I feel it more and more over the summer. It is getting hotter.
Over 90% scientist agree that the climate is changing. They may disagree on the reasons why but they agree. Now every bullshit science paper that disagrees with climate change has to be posted on Sherdog. Sad part is the posters never even bother to read what they are posting.
If this 6 page earth shattering paper that was not peer reviewed, would have been read by the TS, the TS would have thought twice about posting it.
The Bible, Quaran, and Torah are very similar.Certainly... Just like the bible is the only correct religious book. The rest? All nonsense and completely made up
I'm not well versed on the science behind climate change, but will say I don't support anything that will deter people from being more environmentally conscious. I'm afraid some would use studies such as this as an excuse to abandon stewardship of our planet. Whether we're responsible for global warming is largely irrelevant in the overall necessity of taking better care of the environment. Micro plastics, pollution, destruction of habitat, etc are all things we need to get a better handle on and we don't need people shrugging shoulders while washing hands of their part in damage done because they read about something in the same sphere as being beyond their control. T
is all coming from a guy who enjoys using the great outdoors. From camping, wheeling or plinking in the bush to just chilling by a river I'm a fan of using the great outdoors in a sustainable and responsible way.
Thanks for proving my point. I mean you have not even read that stuff, let alone read through the 100 referenced works!What are you talking about? There is quite a gulf between a paper that is 3 pages and includes less than citations, and a real study, done by those who care to employ the scientific method with rigor.
Here is one. 9 pages, It contains 54 referenced works, and has the added benefit of actually reading like a professional paper done with rigor.
https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/full_html/2014/01/swsc130036/swsc130036.html
Here is another. 26 pages, 46 referenced works, and again, reads like something above high school level.
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.594.1424&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Do you see the difference between actual studies and the tripe TS provided? I've seen better papers in English 101.
I seriously doubt this.I don't support anything that will deter people from being more environmentally conscious
Thanks for proving my point. I mean you have not even read that stuff, let alone read through the 100 referenced works!
And you certainly would not understand them had you bothered... be honest!
Look... prove me wrong. In your own words, please explain this:
Using multiple linear regression of several climate forcings, Lean (2010) reports climate sensitivities of ~0.3 C W−1 m2 for solar forcing on decadal time scales...
Don't feel bad, all the other NPCs believe it because of "science" too.
And again, what makes it science to you people is that it came directly from the climate change division at the Bureau of Imaginary information!
Look... prove me wrong. In your own words, please explain this:Don't project your own inability to recall or consume data unto others......
Nobody gives a dusty fuck about the side of the argument that simply throw their hands up and go "I dunno, I don't think that's convincing" absent an argument.
You're not even on thin ice, you're drowning, just like some dipshitted creationist.