Net Neutrality is dead, FCC voted to kill it.

Why would they do that? Internet is not an elastic good. Its closer to a utility. They can all just charge more for zhit packages and agree not to compete so no one has a choice for an ethical company. Then they will carve out regional niches like mafia cabals and everyone will pay more for zhit internet and theyll all make more money, despite the fairy-tale the business community and @Greoric tries to sell about corporations all being rational actors and whatnot.

There's no assumption that all businesses are rational actors in my arguments. The provable premise, however, is that they're more informed actors than government could ever possibly be, even while assuming that all bureaucrats and politicians are angels.
 
Hopefully one day Murkans will wake up and stop letting corporations act like tyrants.

I wonder if your head will explode the day you realize government created the umbrella of protections corporations currently preside under.
 
I see lots of out-of-touch liberal elitists ITT. Rust Belt coalminers know that Comcast deserves better from our society, and they went out there and made it happen. God Bless America.
 
Who else has really come to appreciate small content providers over the last 5 years? Whatever niche interest you have, there's almost guaranteed to be some channel somewhere devoted to it, with a very talented and very undercompensated person doing it for the love and whatever little money they can get to make up for sharing a passion with an audience. I really love that, and I'm afraid this will make that basically go away. It's like an internet version of losing mom & pop stores, but much worse because content is not a good you can find anywhere.
 
I wonder if your head will explode the day you realize government created the umbrella of protections corporations currently preside under.

Ofc they have, because the oligarchy controls the government. Its up to the peasants to take it back, and electing Trump is clearly not the way to do it unless youre a cuck who likes taking it in the arse from corporations.
 
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

STOP STREAMING PORN

DOWNLOAD IT IN CASE OF APOCALYPSE
 
what is this 2006

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Ofc they have, because the oligarchy controls the government. Its up to the peasants to take it back, and electing Trump is clearly not the way to do it unless youre a cuck who likes taking it in the arse from corporations.

Sure. However you want to apply the blame that's fine. I just don't know how you're going to be able to come to the epiphany that there isn't any other way for that rule to exist... least of which as democracy.
 
Last edited:
A sad day for Americans. Unfortunately it's not unique that politicians throw the free Internet, and by extension, the people, under the bus in favor of corporate interests.

You're right, we should have voted for Hillary and got TPP instead

I probably didn't follow the American elections as closely as many Americans, but I do have this vague sense of that there were more people in the running other than Hillary and Trump.
 
The complete ignorance of corporate tyranny by American citizens is astounding.


You're right, we should have voted for Hillary and got TPP instead

Seriously, just accept that you voted for a moron who will further policy that is against your interests. No, "but Hillary!". If you think Clinton's policies would pose even a fraction of the damage of Trump's to middle and lower class people, then you're every bit as dumb as any other Republican.
 
I probably didn't follow the American elections as closely as many Americans, but I do have this vague sense of that there were more people in the running other than Hillary and Trump.

And other than Rand or Bernie they would have all signed onto that deal. Bernie and Rand didn't get the nomination(not that I would have voted for crazy bernie anyway) and that left Trump.

The only other candidate I would take in place of Trump would be Rand Paul.
 
You're right, we should have voted for Hillary and got TPP instead

First post in this thread. Nothing about the topic.

She went back and forth. But anybody who is paying attention knows that's exactly what she was going to do.

Whatever the motive it would have been a disaster for the country

2nd post. More "but Hilary", nothing about the topic.

There is no spin. This is bad policy.

Finally! It's almost like someone had to pry your thoughts on the actual subject from that little peanut. Hmmmm.

Who avoided the topic?

You did. Until you got called out. Weak.
 
The complete ignorance of corporate tyranny by American citizens is astounding.




Seriously, just accept that you voted for a moron who will further policy that is against your interests. No, "but Hillary!". If you think Clinton's policies would pose even a fraction of the damage of Trump's to middle and lower class people, then you're every bit as dumb as any other Republican.

I voted for the best candidate in the race.
 
Back
Top