• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

***NBA 2018 Finals v2: Rigged/ Friendly Refereeing Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lebron was WIDE OPEN with no defender even looking at him when JR started to move out of the paint and the closest defenders were over 10 feet away. He was expecting JR to pass to him, which would have been a far better look than they would have gotten off an inbound play. The only ones that fucked up were Smith for not knowing the score and Hill for missing the FT. Lue and Bern were right to try to take advantage of the situation, until Smith went full retard. Lebron tried to call a TO, clearly he knew they had one.

Someone should look up Lebrons shooting percentage on 30+ footers this season to have an idea of what exactly JR cost them.

A 20% chance? Hill had an 80% chance to make that free throw... and I’m guessing the odds of an offensive rebound are fairly low in that situation.

It’s a bonehead mistake by a career bonehead but it hardly “cost them the game”.
 
The refs cost them the game more than JR Shit.
 
Someone should look up Lebrons shooting percentage on 30+ footers this season to have an idea of what exactly JR cost them.

A 20% chance? Hill had an 80% chance to make that free throw... and I’m guessing the odds of an offensive rebound are fairly low in that situation.

It’s a bonehead mistake by a career bonehead but it hardly “cost them the game”.
TDzSFho.jpg

It wouldn't have needed to be a 30 footer. He could have stepped into a perfect look, wide open 3 (or even closer since they didn't need a 3). Of course he might have missed, but he was shooting very well that game, including from 3. I think it's greater than a 20% shot. It's certainly a better look than they would have gotten off an inbound play. But yeah, Hill absolutely has to make that FT.
 
Last edited:
Nice picture you got there. I hadn’t seen that angle.

Don’t think Lebron could have stepped into that, players close quickly and the ball is in JRs hands... he would have got that shot off tho, straight away from 26-27ft.

Probably a 30-35% chance.
 
Probably would have been 100% since Lebron has made all his game winning jumpers this post season.
 
Probably would have been 100% since Lebron has made all his game winning jumpers this post season.

When did your love affair with Lebron begin? For some reason I don’t remember this a couple years ago.
 
Nice picture you got there. I hadn’t seen that angle.

Don’t think Lebron could have stepped into that, players close quickly and the ball is in JRs hands... he would have got that shot off tho, straight away from 26-27ft.

Probably a 30-35% chance.
Make it or not, people should understand that's why they didn't call TO immediately. At that point, passing to Bern was their best option. And I still think he could have stepped in if JR passes right there and then. Looney is oblivious and Klay has his momentum going a completely different direction. Both have their backs turned to him. No one else has a prayer of even being in his vision when he shoots.

Edit: shout out to Polish for posting the pic in the last thread, btw.
 
Last edited:
When did your love affair with Lebron begin? For some reason I don’t remember this a couple years ago.

idk he's even hoping Lebron lands with the Lakers. Literally obsessed with Lebron right now.
 
TDzSFho.jpg

It wouldn't have needed to be a 30 footer. He could have stepped into a perfect look, wide open 3 (or even closer since they didn't need a 3). Of course he might have missed, but he was shooting very well that game, including from 3. I think it's greater than a 20% shot. It's certainly a better look than they would have gotten off an inbound play. But yeah, Hill absolutely has to make that FT.
My take on that hypothetical situation is that LBJ steps over the three line and gets fouled.
 
Jordan was mostly marketing man. He was and is one of the GOATs but half of his accolades are worthless. All NBA defensive teams were Jordan, Pippen and Rodman.

Shocker that one of them (the most marketable one) got the award every time.

<SelenaWow>
 
Jr should habe just gone back up strong with it before he even turned around. There is only 1 man near him
 
The real battle in game 3 will be between Gilbert and Lacob. Gonna be a bidding war on buying the refs. My boy Ken Mauer is gonna be limousine riding jet flying after these finals.
 
Curious what your take on this thread is since I know you're a big fan of both:

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/prime-kobe-or-prime-curry.3774377/

I think the answer is Curry.

Obviously, Kobe is the better athlete, and this gives him his two greatest strengths over Curry.

1. The ability to lock someone down one on one defensively, I understand the advanced metrics don't give Kobe much credit on the defensive end, but a Prime Kobe came up big shutting people down late in games all the time.

2. Kobe could get his shot off whenever he wanted, and that had it's drawbacks (because he took tons of shitty shots) but it also allowed his team to always have available buckets when the game got tight. Other teams didn't have that. I also realize Kobe is probably the most inflated "clutch" player of all time because of how much he missed game winning shots. But he did his most deadly work in the last 3 minutes, icing games before that last shot was needed.

You covered a lot of what makes Curry better, far more efficient, far better shooter, better play maker, and no player on the planet has a more chaotic impact on the game, and that's because if you aren't suffocating him all game he fucking kills you in 3 minutes.

But imagine this, imagine Curry on those early 00s Lakers teams. Any doubt at all that they aren't BETTER? I don't think so, Curry being the better shooter and play maker makes that team simply too much to handle. Add in that Curry is likely also a better teammate and you have a guy that probably doesn't clash with Shaq and also doesn't end up blowing up the team with off the court drama.

Obviously you need decent players on your team to win championships... and both have had them. In fact Pau was the better player in the 2010 season run, and had a claim to that finals MVP award as he was the more efficient of the two, Kobe shot 40% for the series and had twice the turnovers. But I feel like Curry is an easier fit in more systems. He just adds too much without taking anything away.

I know it’s not a popular opinion, and that’s no surprise, Kobe is Kobe after all. But you just can’t mess up taking the guy with 68% TS from 25ft from the hoop.
 
Last edited:
It's funny to think the Cavs could be getting finals minutes out of Dwayne Wade but they gave him away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top