- Joined
- Feb 21, 2011
- Messages
- 18,451
- Reaction score
- 4,519
I love Nate but screw him if he's gonna be this way. The sport will move on without him
You must be trolling if you think that..L
Lmao if Robbie is your biggest win it shows how overrated his career is by his fans.
He's only ever been a draw with Conor. If he doesn't want to fight just cut him...see who else wants to deal with his bullshitfired?
lol... the kind of money nate could make on the free market....
plus theres no way the ufc would give that draw to another company
Somebody definitely would want to, that's my point. Plus the UFC isn't in the business of giving competitors big drawsHe's only ever been a draw with Conor. If he doesn't want to fight just cut him...see who else wants to deal with his bullshit
Why wasn’t he eligible to fight until last month and when did he say that?I can see his point here, if he was actually not eligible to fight until last month Dana has been lying this whole time about him ducking Woodley and Ferguson. And finally when they agree to a fight they bring him late to the press conference and steal the show with the Mcgregor/Khabib promo.
At the end of the day I think he will fight on 229, but if he doesnt its ok, the guy doesnt give a damn fuck about the UFC or calling out Dana a lier, few people have the balls to the that.
True, but that's assuming Nate is actually a big draw on his own. He might get bellator good ratings on a Saturday night fight, but i don't see him working to sell a bunch of PPVs with the other LWs out thereSomebody definitely would want to, that's my point. Plus the UFC isn't in the business of giving competitors big draws
He was in a court case with someone from his managment team.Why wasn’t he eligible to fight until last month and when did he say that?
He was in a court case with someone from his managment team.
I think he was ineligible. I mean, he pretty much says that he'd like the fight (for the right price) and if that'd happen he'd just pay the difference in the court to get out of it. I'm clueless about court matters though, so, there's that.And in same interview he said he could have fought woodley. Not that he was ineligible to fight him.
He wasn’t ineligible. He had a dispute that complicated his situation. Did he ever say over the last 2 years he was ineligible?I think he was ineligible. I mean, he pretty much says that he'd like the fight (for the right price) and if that'd happen he'd just pay the difference in the court to get out of it. I'm clueless about court matters though, so, there's that.
The sound of the vid makes it difficult for me but it seems like he says so in the beginning. He says someone claimed management on him and he wasn't able to *can't-hear-it* a fight.He wasn’t ineligible. He had a dispute that complicated his situation. Did he ever say over the last 2 years he was ineligible?
I assume you're suggesting this as a punishment? Much tougher fight for Nate IMO.Let Poirier fight Ferguson at UFC 230 and Nate fight Kevin Lee whenever he feels like fighting again.