News Mysterious drones over New Jersey




On the night of March 24, 1967, Robert Salas was a 26-year-old U.S. Air Force lieutenant cocooned 20 metres below the Montana prairie overseeing weaponry that could obliterate millions.
Instead, without any warning, Salas said his menacing cluster of 10 Minutemen 1 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) burrowed beneath the Malmstrom Air Force base a five-hour drive southeast of Calgary seemed to be prey.

But the assailants, he said, weren’t any Cold War foes.
Soviet technology couldn’t have abruptly disabled the missiles’ guidance and control systems, which is what happened that night.
“You would have to have sent individual signals to each missile and within seconds, we had (no power),” said Salas, 82.
“This had never happened before and we have nothing that could do that now.”

Just moments before the systems failure, a non-commissioned security officer on the surface made a series of increasingly frenzied phone calls to Salas, describing an oval-shaped form within pulsating, glowing orange-red lights hovering over the installation.
The NCO had also described the approach of the silent object which “was making unusual, controlled maneuvers, such as flying very fast, coming to a dead stop, then reversing course and making ninety-degree turns,” said Salas, who was locked into the subterranean capsule for security reasons.
“He was screaming in the phone, terrified . . . I told him to secure the facility at all costs.”
Responding to his orders, other security guards scrambled to other launch sites in the complex, only to see glowing objects hovering over them, said Salas.
“It was reported they lost radio contact with the flight security controller and were very shaken by the experience,” he said.
Less than a minute after the pulsating object had arrived over his launch control centre, it had quickly departed, said the U.S. Air Force veteran.
The dumbfounded officer soon found himself in a meeting with his squadron commander and a special investigations officer and was told the incident didn’t involve any kind of air force exercise.

Salas said he was also told to never speak of the incident as it was now classified.
“I signed a non-disclosure agreement . . . I didn’t start talking about it until 1996.”

He also learned 10 ICBMs had been disabled under identical circumstances in September 1966 at the Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota.

“Within a span of six months, we lost 30 nuclear missiles to UFOs,” said Salas, who provided an air force document declassified in 1996 regarding the March 16 incident at Malmstrom, east of Great Falls.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing how easy it is to kick off a mass hysteria event.
<cruzshake>

The sightings have been claimed by several police precincts in NJ, and even the local news helicopters and coast guard at this point.

The logical conclusion is that some goverment department is running these drones.

I used to work with drones in the military, there were strict rules as to when and where we could launch them. We used to have to go 50 miles east to a Marine training location on the coastline called "Cherry Point" to fully train with them over a large area.

Something has changed, and they need to be honest
 
The logical conclusion is that some goverment department is running these drones.

That logic does not hold up to scrutiny in my opinion.
No one has presented a viable theory from what I see. No one can refute the gaps in that logic.

There is no way you can decisively conclude that in a rigorous manner, it is only a “safe assumption” to those who lack the information to make a more educated and nuanced assessment. And you have to come up with more and more assumptions to support it, instead of corroborating it with evidence.

There’s no evidence to prove these are even drones.
They’re car sized and fly continuously for 7 hours at high speeds yet they don’t emit a heat signature? What the hell is powering them?

“It is theoretically impossible with current or foreseeable technology for a car-sized drone to fly for 7 hours at 60 mph while emitting no heat signature. Advanced masking techniques may reduce detectability but cannot entirely negate the fundamental heat generated by propulsion and onboard systems.”
 
That logic does not hold up to scrutiny in my opinion.
No one has presented a viable theory from what I see. No one can refute the gaps in that logic.

There is no way you can decisively conclude that in a rigorous manner, it is only a “safe assumption” to those who lack the information to make a more educated and nuanced assessment. And you have to come up with more and more assumptions to support it, instead of corroborating it with evidence.

There’s no evidence to prove these are even drones.
They’re car sized and fly continuously for 7 hours at high speeds yet they don’t emit a heat signature? What the hell is powering them?

“It is theoretically impossible with current or foreseeable technology for a car-sized drone to fly for 7 hours at 60 mph while emitting no heat signature. Advanced masking techniques may reduce detectability but cannot entirely negate the fundamental heat generated by propulsion and onboard systems.”
I’m not buying those specs. Take it all with a grain of salt. A lot of false reports are going to come in.
 
That logic does not hold up to scrutiny in my opinion.
No one has presented a viable theory from what I see. No one can refute the gaps in that logic.

There is no way you can decisively conclude that in a rigorous manner, it is only a “safe assumption” to those who lack the information to make a more educated and nuanced assessment. And you have to come up with more and more assumptions to support it, instead of corroborating it with evidence.

There’s no evidence to prove these are even drones.
They’re car sized and fly continuously for 7 hours at high speeds yet they don’t emit a heat signature? What the hell is powering them?

“It is theoretically impossible with current or foreseeable technology for a car-sized drone to fly for 7 hours at 60 mph while emitting no heat signature. Advanced masking techniques may reduce detectability but cannot entirely negate the fundamental heat generated by propulsion and onboard systems.”
Are they really car sized though? In most of the videos I've seen, they aren't necessarily car sized. And in the accounts of the police helicopter, and coast guard, I don't believe they mentioned car sized either
 
Are they really car sized though? In most of the videos I've seen, they aren't necessarily car sized. And in the accounts of the police helicopter, and coast guard, I don't believe they mentioned car sized either

The sizes and shapes vary.

But even if the size estimations are exaggerated, when you scale down the dimensions, a drone with the circumference of 6-ft to 10-ft that flies fast enough to evade police drones and helicopters and is up in the air for several hours is expected to give off a heat signature by the known laws of thermodynamics and physics.

I’m sure some are but size and speed to the naked eye are very difficult to determine.
To the naked eye yes, but there is data by the police helicopter and drone encounters.
 
The logical conclusion is that some goverment department is running these drones.
It would be more logical if it was isolated to the rest coast, or even just the US. In Suffolk and Norfolk counties in UK there were reports in late November of scores of drones hovering around the different US military bases. Same thing happened, no news reports, no one cared about it, no explanation given. These bases are more secluded though, out in the sticks and not a mass populated area like NJ/NY.
Ramstein, Germany, as well
 


Why is he saying they’re “not coming off the ocean because multicopter drones don’t have the battery life to travel for miles back and forth?”
All of these drones seem to be fixed wing types, not multicopters, and the reports do state their range to be several miles-wide and the Ocean County sheriff called 9-11 when he saw them come off the ocean.
 
Back
Top